I am curious how many past handicappers that were regulars don't post and possibly read rarely. MIXED_NUTS asked about names that he hasn't seen which apparently they provided accurate information and analysis with best wagers. I am aware where most have gone, and many Boxing/MMA sites specialize in the boxing field, but it is a shame that Covers with so many handicapping viewers can't somehow moderate and keep a much more strict criteria.
From my other post "Someone noted that many past boxing handicappers don't post here anymore and I can see why now with a few very discouraging members, and a few others making false claims. It really hurts a forums credibility and I just would like a shout out (reply), from those interested in returning if changes can be made to moderate unrelated and fictitious statements. I'm sure they tried, but it seems the support was not provided. I will post this on a new thread so any previous members that read but don't post might be willing to give it another attempt. I welcome and appreciate any response, even those who disagree (Devil's Advocate is a great debating way to learn and also create new theories when the mind is challenged.)
PAST MEMEBERS WHO SEE THIS THREAD, PLEASE REPLY (AND ADD IF SO WHAT HAS OR HAS NOT BEEN DONE & WHY IF IT IS LITOSING VALUE MEMBERS. I UNDERSTAND THE FRUSTRATION DEALING WITH TROUBLING MEMBERS (BAD APPLES) THAT HAVE SEEMED TO RUIN A PREVIOUS VALUE MEMBER SITE, NOW A SHADOW WITH A GLIMPSE HERE AND THERE OF PREVIOUS ACTIVE MEMBERS THAT BRING VALUE.
Anyone what can fill me in on the key issues regarding forum moderation and what was done (and the why not reasons). One would assume that one of the most popular handicapping sites would take interest in improving a forum topic. Thanks!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I am curious how many past handicappers that were regulars don't post and possibly read rarely. MIXED_NUTS asked about names that he hasn't seen which apparently they provided accurate information and analysis with best wagers. I am aware where most have gone, and many Boxing/MMA sites specialize in the boxing field, but it is a shame that Covers with so many handicapping viewers can't somehow moderate and keep a much more strict criteria.
From my other post "Someone noted that many past boxing handicappers don't post here anymore and I can see why now with a few very discouraging members, and a few others making false claims. It really hurts a forums credibility and I just would like a shout out (reply), from those interested in returning if changes can be made to moderate unrelated and fictitious statements. I'm sure they tried, but it seems the support was not provided. I will post this on a new thread so any previous members that read but don't post might be willing to give it another attempt. I welcome and appreciate any response, even those who disagree (Devil's Advocate is a great debating way to learn and also create new theories when the mind is challenged.)
PAST MEMEBERS WHO SEE THIS THREAD, PLEASE REPLY (AND ADD IF SO WHAT HAS OR HAS NOT BEEN DONE & WHY IF IT IS LITOSING VALUE MEMBERS. I UNDERSTAND THE FRUSTRATION DEALING WITH TROUBLING MEMBERS (BAD APPLES) THAT HAVE SEEMED TO RUIN A PREVIOUS VALUE MEMBER SITE, NOW A SHADOW WITH A GLIMPSE HERE AND THERE OF PREVIOUS ACTIVE MEMBERS THAT BRING VALUE.
Anyone what can fill me in on the key issues regarding forum moderation and what was done (and the why not reasons). One would assume that one of the most popular handicapping sites would take interest in improving a forum topic. Thanks!
There have been some good ones come and go in this forum. At one point, this was the best sub-forum on this site. NuttyRich was good during his time. A name most probably won't remember, but Fullbrights was real good, too. That was a long time ago, though.
Back then, it was the only reason I even visited this site. Still is, really, but now it's just more for the comedy.
0
There have been some good ones come and go in this forum. At one point, this was the best sub-forum on this site. NuttyRich was good during his time. A name most probably won't remember, but Fullbrights was real good, too. That was a long time ago, though.
Back then, it was the only reason I even visited this site. Still is, really, but now it's just more for the comedy.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
