Your post Hopkins has no chance at winning - pound dawson appears identical to my previous post B Hop and underdog? Let's get serious I made a comment comparing both and the post is nearly identical but I made it 5 hours prior. Please tell me you agreed with my post and used it as I find it difficult that the post is worded differently but is identical in all the factors. As I stated, I'm not accusing but it's hard to believe 5 hours later someone posts 4 critical points and a new thread is made with the same, no more and no less. Any reply would be appreciated?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Your post Hopkins has no chance at winning - pound dawson appears identical to my previous post B Hop and underdog? Let's get serious I made a comment comparing both and the post is nearly identical but I made it 5 hours prior. Please tell me you agreed with my post and used it as I find it difficult that the post is worded differently but is identical in all the factors. As I stated, I'm not accusing but it's hard to believe 5 hours later someone posts 4 critical points and a new thread is made with the same, no more and no less. Any reply would be appreciated?
Attention Jerseyboy89: Any reply regarding my article and question I've asked in this thread, and B Hop and underdog? Let's get serious thread would be appreciated. I don't mind disagreements or heated arguements per say on this site as it seems to be the nature of most forums. Usually when someone agrees or disagrees with a thread they use the quote option that brings the original person quote from a current or previous thread and then comments are added below. Did you see my post on the analysis of the fight? Did you prefer not to copy and paste exactly what I posted and just re-word a brief post? I'm curious to the fact because if somehow you didn't see my post and posted a new topic thread that was only 2 sentences like mine with all 4 exact same factors included, that would be a first for me in over a decade of posting on all sites that have a subjective opinion. Thanks for any reply. The one difference is your topic thread and states Hopkins has no chance... which is crazy.
I still feel Dawson will win, but a legend that has been known to dismantle opponents systematically and then psychologically break them down. SawLo stated that Dawson is immature still, but I feel that he has consistently fought the best in his division and has a lot of ring experience and seems to work on and improve on his weak areas. I noticed after interview early when he became a champion, he rarely discussed upcoming opponents but areas he needs improvement and he's observant in self-awareness.
0
Attention Jerseyboy89: Any reply regarding my article and question I've asked in this thread, and B Hop and underdog? Let's get serious thread would be appreciated. I don't mind disagreements or heated arguements per say on this site as it seems to be the nature of most forums. Usually when someone agrees or disagrees with a thread they use the quote option that brings the original person quote from a current or previous thread and then comments are added below. Did you see my post on the analysis of the fight? Did you prefer not to copy and paste exactly what I posted and just re-word a brief post? I'm curious to the fact because if somehow you didn't see my post and posted a new topic thread that was only 2 sentences like mine with all 4 exact same factors included, that would be a first for me in over a decade of posting on all sites that have a subjective opinion. Thanks for any reply. The one difference is your topic thread and states Hopkins has no chance... which is crazy.
I still feel Dawson will win, but a legend that has been known to dismantle opponents systematically and then psychologically break them down. SawLo stated that Dawson is immature still, but I feel that he has consistently fought the best in his division and has a lot of ring experience and seems to work on and improve on his weak areas. I noticed after interview early when he became a champion, he rarely discussed upcoming opponents but areas he needs improvement and he's observant in self-awareness.
Your post Hopkins has no chance at winning - pound dawson appears identical to my previous post B Hop and underdog? Let's get serious I made a comment comparing both and the post is nearly identical but I made it 5 hours prior. Please tell me you agreed with my post and used it as I find it difficult that the post is worded differently but is identical in all the factors. As I stated, I'm not accusing but it's hard to believe 5 hours later someone posts 4 critical points and a new thread is made with the same, no more and no less. Any reply would be appreciated?
NO i didn't read your thread. matter of fact I only read about 2 sentes of this thread.
Dawson is the clear play. I can't see how Hopkins can win a decision vs Dawson. He simply does not throw enough punches. This will be an easy fight for Dawson. There's a reason why Hopkins wanted no part of him 2 years ago.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ZOUK:
Your post Hopkins has no chance at winning - pound dawson appears identical to my previous post B Hop and underdog? Let's get serious I made a comment comparing both and the post is nearly identical but I made it 5 hours prior. Please tell me you agreed with my post and used it as I find it difficult that the post is worded differently but is identical in all the factors. As I stated, I'm not accusing but it's hard to believe 5 hours later someone posts 4 critical points and a new thread is made with the same, no more and no less. Any reply would be appreciated?
NO i didn't read your thread. matter of fact I only read about 2 sentes of this thread.
Dawson is the clear play. I can't see how Hopkins can win a decision vs Dawson. He simply does not throw enough punches. This will be an easy fight for Dawson. There's a reason why Hopkins wanted no part of him 2 years ago.
Thanks for the reply. I will take you at your word regardless of the similarity. Consider if you were me, the posts are nearly the same, what would you think?
0
Thanks for the reply. I will take you at your word regardless of the similarity. Consider if you were me, the posts are nearly the same, what would you think?
1. I do sell my picks, but I don not on advertise or sell on Covers. I have a client list I've had for nearly a decade and it's mostly very high bettors that need several sources to lay big money.
2. I put a good deal on work and energy into providing accurate information to other members, so if another person is copying me, I take it as a compliment but also it is disrespectful. I don't care if someone lashes out at me as that is the nature of things, I do expect a slight bit of professionalism among a small but knowledgeable group of members.
0
1. I do sell my picks, but I don not on advertise or sell on Covers. I have a client list I've had for nearly a decade and it's mostly very high bettors that need several sources to lay big money.
2. I put a good deal on work and energy into providing accurate information to other members, so if another person is copying me, I take it as a compliment but also it is disrespectful. I don't care if someone lashes out at me as that is the nature of things, I do expect a slight bit of professionalism among a small but knowledgeable group of members.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.