I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
The hits just keep on coming, countless ripoffs. Add injury to insult, always at least one judge with a super lop sided decision.
It's why I said you can have the WINNER and NOT have the WINNER.
Good call on the fight Mack, sad thing is many many Americans won't even hear of this.
I always say to myself now, look at the two fighters, if one is a veteran who is on his way out, and the other is going to be a star, unless he does SERIOUS damage, the Up and Comer will always get the nod.
Another black eye on boxing, with no end is sight!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
The hits just keep on coming, countless ripoffs. Add injury to insult, always at least one judge with a super lop sided decision.
It's why I said you can have the WINNER and NOT have the WINNER.
Good call on the fight Mack, sad thing is many many Americans won't even hear of this.
I always say to myself now, look at the two fighters, if one is a veteran who is on his way out, and the other is going to be a star, unless he does SERIOUS damage, the Up and Comer will always get the nod.
Another black eye on boxing, with no end is sight!
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
Just say not to crack Cee Money- geez. Ignore this tard Mack, nice pick and post, and no doubt how do this corrupt folks sleep at night.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Cee_MoNeY:
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
Just say not to crack Cee Money- geez. Ignore this tard Mack, nice pick and post, and no doubt how do this corrupt folks sleep at night.
Cee Money you are a total *&^%**. He was -600 with EVERY British bookmaker. I never mentioned anything about the amount of money I had on the fight....Give it up will you
0
Cee Money you are a total *&^%**. He was -600 with EVERY British bookmaker. I never mentioned anything about the amount of money I had on the fight....Give it up will you
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
