I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
The hits just keep on coming, countless ripoffs. Add injury to insult, always at least one judge with a super lop sided decision.
It's why I said you can have the WINNER and NOT have the WINNER.
Good call on the fight Mack, sad thing is many many Americans won't even hear of this.
I always say to myself now, look at the two fighters, if one is a veteran who is on his way out, and the other is going to be a star, unless he does SERIOUS damage, the Up and Comer will always get the nod.
Another black eye on boxing, with no end is sight!
Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
The hits just keep on coming, countless ripoffs. Add injury to insult, always at least one judge with a super lop sided decision.
It's why I said you can have the WINNER and NOT have the WINNER.
Good call on the fight Mack, sad thing is many many Americans won't even hear of this.
I always say to myself now, look at the two fighters, if one is a veteran who is on his way out, and the other is going to be a star, unless he does SERIOUS damage, the Up and Comer will always get the nod.
Another black eye on boxing, with no end is sight!
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:
I just watched a boxing match (English Heavyweight Championship) with an up and coming unbeaten heavyweight Tyson Fury against a seasoned vetern John McDermott. Fury was a -600 fav and I didn't see any value in that so I bet small on McDermott.
The fight was a great fight. Real tough fight. I had McDermott winning by 3 rounds. The guys on Sky had it by 2 to McDermott and the journalists 4 McDermott. Fury somehow wins is by 8 rounds to 2!!!
Worst boxing decision I have ever seen. These dodgy decisions are ruining the sport we love..Surely some sort of investigation needs to be done into the corruption of boxing..
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
Just say not to crack Cee Money- geez. Ignore this tard Mack, nice pick and post, and no doubt how do this corrupt folks sleep at night.
Quote Originally Posted by Cee_MoNeY:
where was fury -600 and which book was that cause that wasnt posted anywhere near that total....Try -425...secondly of course u had Mcdermott small at around 2k after the fight ended...is that small for u??????
where was the vaule in betting Mcdermott to being with when infact there was only one judge to bribe......
yes the referee, the same one fury's team picked and the same one who was in there to protect him gave him the winning score...
mack u are so full of shit.....
i forgot to tell you all i 100 k on the winner of marquez and mayweather
Just say not to crack Cee Money- geez. Ignore this tard Mack, nice pick and post, and no doubt how do this corrupt folks sleep at night.
Cee Money you are a total *&^%**. He was -600 with EVERY British bookmaker. I never mentioned anything about the amount of money I had on the fight....Give it up will you
Cee Money you are a total *&^%**. He was -600 with EVERY British bookmaker. I never mentioned anything about the amount of money I had on the fight....Give it up will you
Hot Forum Topics
