Kendall Holt vs. Ricardo Torres Holt By Decision (+150) (Bodog) 1.5 units Torres Gets Knocked Down or Out (+140) (Bodog) 0.5 unit
Yesterday, I studied the youtube footage of the first fight, and it was glaringly obvious that Holt is a much better boxer than Torres. Moreover, Holt has superior handspeed, as he was able to rock Torres several times when the Colombian brawler tried to force his way inside. In the first round, I thought Holt hurt Torres to the body when Torres went down, but the ref ruled it a slip. Given that I was watching an Internet stream, I'm willing to give the ref a pass on that one. But bias seemed evident at the end of round 2 when Holt delivered a pretty three punch combo to the body, and the ref paused the action to warn Holt for hitting low. After looking at it again, I'm sure that Holt's punches were above the belt line. Holt displayed some nice footwork in round 3, making Torres miss, and then sending him reeling with a left hook to the body followed by a clean overhand right to the head. Torres began to apply some good pressure on Holt in the middle rounds, but slow motion replays of the inside action showed that Torres was mostly missing while Holt connected with his fast counter combos. Holt knocked Torres down in round 6 when Torres became over-aggressive in an attempt to pin Holt against the ropes. This was pretty much the same punch that hurt Torres in round 3, the overhand right to the head. Overall, Holt has better boxing instincts, superior footwork, faster hands, and better ring generalship. Torres is quite mechanical in his movement, and that allows Holt to pretty much box rings around the plodding Colombian. Of course, I would be remiss if I didn't address the 11th round "KO" by Torres. I believe Holt when he says that the ring had become very slippery due to beer being spilled by the raucous ringside crowd, as there were some noticeable slippages. When Holt gets knocked down the first time, that was a pretty clean hit by Torres, but it was more of a flash knockdown, as Holt seemed fine afterwards. When the fight gets stopped with about a minute left, Holt appeared to be slipping, and he looks down at his feet (which indicates that there was something wrong with his footing). Of course, Torres is punching in a flurry, but he had delivered innocuous flurries all match, as he's just too slow for the quick reflexes of Holt. The ref's stoppage was completely immature, and Holt immediately protests. This was not a hurt fighter. I expect more of the same on Saturday night, except there won't be the Colombian hijinks ringside, and the ref should be more neutral. The reason why I include the prop on Torres being knocked down is that he's such a reckless fighter that I think there's a good chance that Holt again catches him with some clean counters when Torres tries to come in (I'm predicting the overhand right). However, it's in Holt's best interest to box rather than bang, so I don't see him being tempted to "go for the kill." Also, Torres has experience getting up from knockdowns. One final note: I was wavering between the Bodog decision prop at +150 and the 5dimes decision prop at +168. The difference between the two is that the Bodog prop allows bettors to win on a technical decision when the fight doesn't go the full 12 rounds, while the fight must go the full 12 rounds with the 5dimes prop. I'm willing to give up a little extra juice in order to receive the possible benefit of the technical decision.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
2007: +12.45 units 2008: +9.01 units
Kendall Holt vs. Ricardo Torres Holt By Decision (+150) (Bodog) 1.5 units Torres Gets Knocked Down or Out (+140) (Bodog) 0.5 unit
Yesterday, I studied the youtube footage of the first fight, and it was glaringly obvious that Holt is a much better boxer than Torres. Moreover, Holt has superior handspeed, as he was able to rock Torres several times when the Colombian brawler tried to force his way inside. In the first round, I thought Holt hurt Torres to the body when Torres went down, but the ref ruled it a slip. Given that I was watching an Internet stream, I'm willing to give the ref a pass on that one. But bias seemed evident at the end of round 2 when Holt delivered a pretty three punch combo to the body, and the ref paused the action to warn Holt for hitting low. After looking at it again, I'm sure that Holt's punches were above the belt line. Holt displayed some nice footwork in round 3, making Torres miss, and then sending him reeling with a left hook to the body followed by a clean overhand right to the head. Torres began to apply some good pressure on Holt in the middle rounds, but slow motion replays of the inside action showed that Torres was mostly missing while Holt connected with his fast counter combos. Holt knocked Torres down in round 6 when Torres became over-aggressive in an attempt to pin Holt against the ropes. This was pretty much the same punch that hurt Torres in round 3, the overhand right to the head. Overall, Holt has better boxing instincts, superior footwork, faster hands, and better ring generalship. Torres is quite mechanical in his movement, and that allows Holt to pretty much box rings around the plodding Colombian. Of course, I would be remiss if I didn't address the 11th round "KO" by Torres. I believe Holt when he says that the ring had become very slippery due to beer being spilled by the raucous ringside crowd, as there were some noticeable slippages. When Holt gets knocked down the first time, that was a pretty clean hit by Torres, but it was more of a flash knockdown, as Holt seemed fine afterwards. When the fight gets stopped with about a minute left, Holt appeared to be slipping, and he looks down at his feet (which indicates that there was something wrong with his footing). Of course, Torres is punching in a flurry, but he had delivered innocuous flurries all match, as he's just too slow for the quick reflexes of Holt. The ref's stoppage was completely immature, and Holt immediately protests. This was not a hurt fighter. I expect more of the same on Saturday night, except there won't be the Colombian hijinks ringside, and the ref should be more neutral. The reason why I include the prop on Torres being knocked down is that he's such a reckless fighter that I think there's a good chance that Holt again catches him with some clean counters when Torres tries to come in (I'm predicting the overhand right). However, it's in Holt's best interest to box rather than bang, so I don't see him being tempted to "go for the kill." Also, Torres has experience getting up from knockdowns. One final note: I was wavering between the Bodog decision prop at +150 and the 5dimes decision prop at +168. The difference between the two is that the Bodog prop allows bettors to win on a technical decision when the fight doesn't go the full 12 rounds, while the fight must go the full 12 rounds with the 5dimes prop. I'm willing to give up a little extra juice in order to receive the possible benefit of the technical decision.
My English bookie is offering Holt by dec @ 1.85. A huge difference. On reflection, If I were the bookie, I'd think be offering the dec at less than even as Torres has a proven record of getting up to win. Anyways, consider this: Holt may have the reach, speed and power; Torres fights Holt with a modified style, bobing on the way in that nulifies much of Holt's first strike edge. Holt uses an upright waltzing sort of stance that saves energy but makes it hard to intercept Torres low on the entry. Holt may have bigger guns, but is chinless so ultimately both boxers go down in a good hit. Most importantly, I feel Holt's concentration somehow erodes as a fight goes on, while Torres is rock solid in this regard. It's a very tense affair, betting on "Glass cannon" Holt.
0
My English bookie is offering Holt by dec @ 1.85. A huge difference. On reflection, If I were the bookie, I'd think be offering the dec at less than even as Torres has a proven record of getting up to win. Anyways, consider this: Holt may have the reach, speed and power; Torres fights Holt with a modified style, bobing on the way in that nulifies much of Holt's first strike edge. Holt uses an upright waltzing sort of stance that saves energy but makes it hard to intercept Torres low on the entry. Holt may have bigger guns, but is chinless so ultimately both boxers go down in a good hit. Most importantly, I feel Holt's concentration somehow erodes as a fight goes on, while Torres is rock solid in this regard. It's a very tense affair, betting on "Glass cannon" Holt.
I agree about the stylistic clash, Coweringbeef, but that's the main
reason for my play. Torres' bobbing is part of that mechanical style
I'm referring to in my writeup. It almost seems as if he's been
choreographed to bob at regular intervals during his forward movement,
which keeps Torres away from Holt's long arms, resulting in little
action from the outside. For this reason, Torres won't get worn down
over the course of the fight, and you can throw out the possibility of
an attrition-type KO.
Even though I also question Holt's chin, I just don't see Torres as
being able to hit Holt enough to make that an issue. Torres' relative
lack of hand speed allows Holt to dodge almost all of his power
punches, and it's Torres who usually ends up the victim during the inside exchanges. As a result, Torres ends up having to respect Holt, who can put on a bit of a boxing clinic as Torres recovers on the outside. For action fans, these rounds
really aren't very entertaining as Holt probably ends up
throwing less than 30 punches. But he's always outlanding Torres, and
that should suit Holt, as minimizing exchanges means minimizing danger. If
Holt can win the rounds while doing so, why should he change his
gameplan? I don't see why he wouldn't want the fight continuing along the
same path as last time, and that should result in a wide decision win.
0
I agree about the stylistic clash, Coweringbeef, but that's the main
reason for my play. Torres' bobbing is part of that mechanical style
I'm referring to in my writeup. It almost seems as if he's been
choreographed to bob at regular intervals during his forward movement,
which keeps Torres away from Holt's long arms, resulting in little
action from the outside. For this reason, Torres won't get worn down
over the course of the fight, and you can throw out the possibility of
an attrition-type KO.
Even though I also question Holt's chin, I just don't see Torres as
being able to hit Holt enough to make that an issue. Torres' relative
lack of hand speed allows Holt to dodge almost all of his power
punches, and it's Torres who usually ends up the victim during the inside exchanges. As a result, Torres ends up having to respect Holt, who can put on a bit of a boxing clinic as Torres recovers on the outside. For action fans, these rounds
really aren't very entertaining as Holt probably ends up
throwing less than 30 punches. But he's always outlanding Torres, and
that should suit Holt, as minimizing exchanges means minimizing danger. If
Holt can win the rounds while doing so, why should he change his
gameplan? I don't see why he wouldn't want the fight continuing along the
same path as last time, and that should result in a wide decision win.
When he decked Torres in round 6 of the first fight, Torres dropped like he had been shot, then during the count you could see holt getting hit on the dome by a flying beer can LOL.
If he hurts Torres this time, I expect him to finish.
I will go with round 6 again.
Good luck all.
0
I am going with Holt by stoppage.
When he decked Torres in round 6 of the first fight, Torres dropped like he had been shot, then during the count you could see holt getting hit on the dome by a flying beer can LOL.
If he hurts Torres this time, I expect him to finish.
Vidoz is older and has come in about 10lbs heavier than his usual and optimal weight suggesting he has not trained. Sure, Sam is an old fattie too but he weighed about 250lbs, which is what he weighed in his last few fights. These two know each other, and Sam is one who is smiling so I hope they have come to an agreement about who will win. I hope so anyway.
0
Sinan Samil Sam to win @ 1.67
Med bet
Vidoz is older and has come in about 10lbs heavier than his usual and optimal weight suggesting he has not trained. Sure, Sam is an old fattie too but he weighed about 250lbs, which is what he weighed in his last few fights. These two know each other, and Sam is one who is smiling so I hope they have come to an agreement about who will win. I hope so anyway.
When he decked Torres in round 6 of the first fight, Torres dropped like he had been shot, then during the count you could see holt getting hit on the dome by a flying beer can LOL.
If he hurts Torres this time, I expect him to finish.
I will go with round 6 again.
Good luck all.
Great call, Weepaul. Torres came out so fast and aggressive that he ran right into that headbutt. Holt then caught him clean, and it was over.
0
Quote Originally Posted by weepaul:
I am going with Holt by stoppage.
When he decked Torres in round 6 of the first fight, Torres dropped like he had been shot, then during the count you could see holt getting hit on the dome by a flying beer can LOL.
If he hurts Torres this time, I expect him to finish.
I will go with round 6 again.
Good luck all.
Great call, Weepaul. Torres came out so fast and aggressive that he ran right into that headbutt. Holt then caught him clean, and it was over.
Great call, Weepaul. Torres came out so fast and aggressive that he ran right into that headbutt. Holt then caught him clean, and it was over.
Thanks bud. There is no doubt the headbutt was the deciding factor in this fight but I do believe turnaround is fair play after Torres whacked Holt with that cheapshot after the second knockdown.
I'm glad you took Torres to get knocked down or out. It takes some of the sting away.
0
Quote Originally Posted by A2C:
Great call, Weepaul. Torres came out so fast and aggressive that he ran right into that headbutt. Holt then caught him clean, and it was over.
Thanks bud. There is no doubt the headbutt was the deciding factor in this fight but I do believe turnaround is fair play after Torres whacked Holt with that cheapshot after the second knockdown.
I'm glad you took Torres to get knocked down or out. It takes some of the sting away.
That certainly was a head butt from hell that set up the savage KO. I can't believe the shobox announcers were still saying the glancing body punch Holt landed might have broken his ribs after the first few replays. You really have to wonder though, after being put to sleep like that, if Torres will ever be the same. He could end up with the Jaidon Codrington syndrome.
0
That certainly was a head butt from hell that set up the savage KO. I can't believe the shobox announcers were still saying the glancing body punch Holt landed might have broken his ribs after the first few replays. You really have to wonder though, after being put to sleep like that, if Torres will ever be the same. He could end up with the Jaidon Codrington syndrome.
Thanks bud. There is no doubt the headbutt was the deciding factor in this fight but I do believe turnaround is fair play after Torres whacked Holt with that cheapshot after the second knockdown.
I'm glad you took Torres to get knocked down or out. It takes some of the sting away.
Oh, yeah, Torres totally got what he deserved, and the butt wasn't Holt's fault. Torres was fighting reckless, and that's what happens when you eschew all semblance of defense.
0
Quote Originally Posted by weepaul:
Thanks bud. There is no doubt the headbutt was the deciding factor in this fight but I do believe turnaround is fair play after Torres whacked Holt with that cheapshot after the second knockdown.
I'm glad you took Torres to get knocked down or out. It takes some of the sting away.
Oh, yeah, Torres totally got what he deserved, and the butt wasn't Holt's fault. Torres was fighting reckless, and that's what happens when you eschew all semblance of defense.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.