An example of great handicappers...
Jerseyboy89 - A 22 year old kid from Jersey
who never laced up and watches re-runs on HBO 24/7 and is in love with Mexican
fighters (Even Margarito who can't win without Plaster, but even better is his
denial throughout. What a man he is... there is dirty fighting, then pure
cheating endangering opponents lives and has no integrity to admit anything.
Any fighter knows if his hands were wrapped using a different method or even
His first starting thread of the year:
Montiel
is going to destory that fraud Donaire:
DOnaire has no chin and no heart. Montiel has a mexicans heart and
will die in the ring to win. Montiel will wear out Donaire. Put the
house on Montiel.
Not a good start losing a house...lol. He returned strong!
That
one knee coward will get smashed by Mexican fighters
the one kneed coward loooked like shit against a terrible Mayorga.
Saul Alvarez and even a shot Margarito will KO this HBO fraud.
Cotto is famous for getting his ass kicked and nothing else.
Since he wasn't so sharp...he copied others. Or coincidentally, did his first
analysis without just saying coward.
Dawson/B-Hop Post by Jerseyboy89 (COPY??)
#1 Posted: 9/30/2011 12:46:39 AM
Your post Hopkins
has no chance at winning - pound dawson
appears identical to my previous post B
Hop and underdog? Let's get serious
I made a comment comparing both and the post is nearly identical but I made it
5 hours prior. Please tell me you agreed with my post and used it as I find it
difficult that the post is worded differently but is identical in all the
factors. As I stated, I'm not accusing but it's hard to believe 5 hours later
someone posts 4 critical points and a new thread is made with the same, no more
and no less.
Any reply would be appreciated?
A few days later....
I made a previous post, but no offense it's almost a carbon copy. I have to
ask you, did you use my post and agree? or was it just a rare co-incidence that
4 basic points were the same?
Posted: 9/26/2011 5:55:32 PM
I think Dawson is to young and athletic
(and fundamentally good) and will be to busy for B-Hop. Similar to B-hop vs
Taylor except that Dawson is a much better fighter and has good stamina,
Hopkins is a pound-for-pound great and already a legend, but this fight I say
Dawson wins around 8 or 9 rounds to win a decision.
my link: https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=39&sub=101102420&page=2
1.last time he face someone as fast and athletic was taylor
(mine:Similar to B-hop vs Taylor except that Dawson is a much better
fighter)
2.dawson is twice the fighter taylor was
(mine: Similar to B-hop vs Taylor except that Dawson is a much better
fighter)
3.dawson has a high punch output
(mine:I think Dawson is to young and athletic (and fundamentally good) and
will be to busy for B-Hop)
4.i see this an easy 8-4 for dawson
(mine: Dawson wins around 8 or 9 rounds to win a decision)
I'm glad you did say in the subject that Hopkins has no chance, because that is
crazy. What if you get an accidental headbutt on Dawson
and he gets cut, etc... many things can go wrong. People under-estimating Hopkins
is usually the downfall. Strange you didn't mention Calzaghe because I was
going to but kept it brief and to the point. Calzaghe was a fast, smart and
somewhat un-orthodoxed fighter that gave fighters trouble. Although it was a
split-decision (early knockdown for Hopkins),
I felt that although it was close that Calzaghe clearly won.
Overall: I find it very hard to believe you had the same exact points as
me, no more or even different. I don't mind if someone says they agree or
disagree, but copying another person's post and pawning it as your own is not
cool.
Hot Forum Topics
