Imagine the uproar if Joe would have said he would never lose to a black guy! 
Calzaghe might not be Echols or Vanderpool but Hopkins damn sure isn't Manfraudo or Kessler. Hopkins has been in against the much better competition it's not even debatable.
Calzaghe might not be Echols or Vanderpool but Hopkins damn sure isn't Manfraudo or Kessler. Hopkins has been in against the much better competition it's not even debatable.
I'd probably pick Kessler also, but I'm disturbed by the thought that what he did to a still very raw Andrade has any bearing at all on how he would match up against Bernard.
And as for part two, Tarver. Whose style was made to order for him, granted.
Calzaghe might not be Echols or Vanderpool but Hopkins damn sure isn't Manfraudo or Kessler. Hopkins has been in against the much better competition it's not even debatable.
Padding Stats ? 
Who the fuck has Calzaghe fought? He's honed his skills on a bunch a soft Euro-fighters. Like I've said before, my head is with Calzahge, but my heart is with B-Hop, and I'm going with my heart.
I think the comment B-Hop said about he would never lose to a white boy was wrong also. But when asked about it on a radio station the other day he didn't back down from it. He basically said so what I said it, and what of it. Then he went on some sort of tiraid to justify it. Bernard by a very close decision. But I would'nt be surprised in the least bit if the "white boy" beat him. 
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
