The PBF/JMM card just got a lot more entertaining. . . Judah is one of few fighters who's fights are can't miss, just because he's so batshit. On ability and talent alone, Judah should wipe the floor with Hatton, but typically after the 4th rd, Judah turns into a pumpkin, and who knows what is going to happen.
My best guess on the line would be -350 range on Judah? Little light because of the craziness factor, otherwise I'd think it's north of -400
Thoughts?
Bagel Sandwiches Suck
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Per ESB
The PBF/JMM card just got a lot more entertaining. . . Judah is one of few fighters who's fights are can't miss, just because he's so batshit. On ability and talent alone, Judah should wipe the floor with Hatton, but typically after the 4th rd, Judah turns into a pumpkin, and who knows what is going to happen.
My best guess on the line would be -350 range on Judah? Little light because of the craziness factor, otherwise I'd think it's north of -400
Zab is goofy enough and mroe than mentally unstable to lose any fight. I remember a couple years ago, he was a -7000 fave against some journeyman in a tune up fight on ESPN, and they had a clash of heads in the 1st round and went to a no contest. . .
I love the guy because of his "surprise" element, at times he looks brilliant, and I'm pretty sure he will win, but at what price do you take Hatton?
Bagel Sandwiches Suck
0
Really?
Zab is goofy enough and mroe than mentally unstable to lose any fight. I remember a couple years ago, he was a -7000 fave against some journeyman in a tune up fight on ESPN, and they had a clash of heads in the 1st round and went to a no contest. . .
I love the guy because of his "surprise" element, at times he looks brilliant, and I'm pretty sure he will win, but at what price do you take Hatton?
Zab is goofy enough and mroe than mentally unstable to lose any fight. I remember a couple years ago, he was a -7000 fave against some journeyman in a tune up fight on ESPN, and they had a clash of heads in the 1st round and went to a no contest. . .
I love the guy because of his "surprise" element, at times he looks brilliant, and I'm pretty sure he will win, but at what price do you take Hatton?
There is NO price that anyone would take Matthew Hatton, this fight is a complete joke, don't under estimate Zab Juddah he has a very great left and is a great boxer, he had Floyd troubled for 4 rounds, he had Cotto almost OUT before Cotto hit him with a low blow in the 3rd round!! Yes he fades during fights, but Matthew Hatton is NO May Weather or Cotto or Clottey (which he did well in).
Hattons Only name on his resume is a washed up Ben Tackie who really was a 140 pound fighter but has been washed up for a few years now.
Cannot believe they actually have the nerve to put this on the under card, guess we can get rid of both Hatton's in One Month for Good, so all is not lost!
No disrespect to Matthew Hatton, but he's been fighting basically under his brothers guidance and only got fights because of Ricky. He's severely out classed here and has done NOTHING to warrant to be on a PPV under card.
0
Quote Originally Posted by G8RB8:
Really?
Zab is goofy enough and mroe than mentally unstable to lose any fight. I remember a couple years ago, he was a -7000 fave against some journeyman in a tune up fight on ESPN, and they had a clash of heads in the 1st round and went to a no contest. . .
I love the guy because of his "surprise" element, at times he looks brilliant, and I'm pretty sure he will win, but at what price do you take Hatton?
There is NO price that anyone would take Matthew Hatton, this fight is a complete joke, don't under estimate Zab Juddah he has a very great left and is a great boxer, he had Floyd troubled for 4 rounds, he had Cotto almost OUT before Cotto hit him with a low blow in the 3rd round!! Yes he fades during fights, but Matthew Hatton is NO May Weather or Cotto or Clottey (which he did well in).
Hattons Only name on his resume is a washed up Ben Tackie who really was a 140 pound fighter but has been washed up for a few years now.
Cannot believe they actually have the nerve to put this on the under card, guess we can get rid of both Hatton's in One Month for Good, so all is not lost!
No disrespect to Matthew Hatton, but he's been fighting basically under his brothers guidance and only got fights because of Ricky. He's severely out classed here and has done NOTHING to warrant to be on a PPV under card.
No disrespect to Matthew Hatton, but he's been fighting basically under his brothers guidance and only got fights because of Ricky. He's severely out classed here and has done NOTHING to warrant to be on a PPV under card.
Exactly. If his name was Matthew Smith, none of us would've ever seen or heard of him.
0
Quote Originally Posted by nuttyrich:
No disrespect to Matthew Hatton, but he's been fighting basically under his brothers guidance and only got fights because of Ricky. He's severely out classed here and has done NOTHING to warrant to be on a PPV under card.
Exactly. If his name was Matthew Smith, none of us would've ever seen or heard of him.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.