All Forums | Boxing

Jermain Taylor vs Carl Froch (3.5 Units)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 449
Posts: 14
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 39
Posted: #1
 Jermain Taylor -130 (3.5 Units) {Risked Units 4.55}
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 16348
Posted: #2
double, you watching,,need updates once things get rolling please
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 39
Posted: #3
It's over. Froch won. I posted late and didn't double up my bet. Taylor was winning 106-102 on all 3 cards when the fight was stopped. Taylor lost with 14 seconds left in the fight, I'm glad I posted late and no one bet seeing that I wagered on it.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 708
Posted: #4
[Quote: Originally Posted by Double-Barrel]
It's over. Froch won. I posted late and didn't double up my bet. Taylor was winning 106-102 on all 3 cards when the fight was stopped. Taylor lost with 14 seconds left in the fight, I'm glad I posted late and no one bet seeing that I wagered on it.

[/Quo

oh man that was brutal. i had 5 unit exposure to JT. that just fucked up my whole weekend. congrats froch backers

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 403
Posted: #5
taylor was up 106-102 on two cards
froch was 106-102 on the other.
good fight!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 17
Posted: #6
thats what u get for posting in the middle of the 9th round when Taylor was up big
 
 
trying to trick the covers cummunity
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 39
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by Double-Barrel:

 I feel Jermain has the speed, power and experience over Froch, but his stamina is a big question here along with Froch's real first test. At first glance this fight looks like great value for Taylor bettors, but Taylor's stamina issues and Froch's fast paced but yet to be really put to the test are two very big question marks. Can Froch bring 12 rounds of pressure against a real opponent? Will Jermain attempt a KO knowing he might burn some late round energy (he didn't against Lacy)?
Question 1: Yes, Froch can bring 12 rounds of pressure (btw- some major newspaper covering the fight had it listed as a 10 round bout, in that case I guess Taylor won the fight in their morning write-up)
Question 2: Jermain through heavy, but not enough to close the deal. Apparently, he should have either attempted a KO with using more energy, or he should have back of some during a few rounds.
To lose with 14 seconds left has to be heart wrenching for Jermain, and glorious for Froch. I didn't catch every momonent of the entire fight, but I saw enough, and finally the ending.
The questions were answered, Jermain doesn't have the stamina, Froch can handle a real fighter (as I said, everyone is a nobody till they fight a somebody). I'll chalk this up as my first wagering loss of the year in the boxing ring. In the analysis of the fight many objective and subjective views are taken to come to a conclusion, but when it comes time to collect, the better you are at breaking it down, the more often you succeed.
As far as lasting 2,146 seconds (and winning up until that point), and losing with only 14 seconds... he needed just another .64% of the time left to win. I won by 2.58 seconds with Chavez before, and that bet was slightly larger.
In boxing, it's not like most sports, a big lead for you (and/or your team) and for your opponent, the biggest enemy is the clock. Every second counts in winning or losing... I'll end this with a movie quote.
"It doesn’t matter if you win by an inch or a mile; winning’s winning."
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 39
Posted: #8
Wake up. I wasn't trying to trick the community. If you read my earlier posts it stated I was going with Taylor if I was betting. Also, as I stated, I didn't get back in time from traveling to post, that's why I missed much of the fight. Learn to read previous posts and write-ups before accusing someone of trying to trick the community when Taylor was up BIG. If you did read them, you would have seen that my concern was not Taylor being ahead early, but lasting (lol). I'm sure everyone can check the times of posts, but we do apprecaite your detective work. Unfortunately, we don't need CSI on this forum,... just boxing fans, enthusiasts and handicappers. Thanks anyways for your intention of defending the Boxing Forums integrity.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 39
Posted: #9
As for movie quotes:
"You talkin' to me? You talkin' to me? You talkin' to me? Then who the hell else are you talking... you talking to me? Well I'm the only one here. Who the fu$$ do you think you're talking to? Oh yeah? OK."
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 17
Posted: #10
 u wanted credit after taylor was up big and u thought he would win
 
 
 
low class
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 39
Posted: #11
Calling someone out when you never checked all the facts,.. shame on you. Trying to make a name as a sheriff. I'm sure all the posters that have actually READ my posts, and knew I was going with Taylor, would maybe disagree (or laugh at you, or with you).
DID YOU JUST START YOUR ACCOUNT TONIGHT? lol... oops, didn't mean to do a 3rd round KO on you. GL in your future posts, but I don't think you'll recover. After making 8 posts with a combined total words of maybe 100, your input will be sorely missed. Take care in your next alias account or new forum account site, I'm sure you'll get the credit as the CSI Froch man!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 1709
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by TruthIs:

 u wanted credit after taylor was up big and u thought he would win
 
 
 
low class


Actually Double  always does amazing write ups and clearly stated he was taking Jermaine.

Double I don't know who this guy is as he just made an account and seems to be bashing anyone who backed Jermaine.

We all look forward to your write ups and we all knew who you had.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 39
Posted: #13
TruthIs: All posts.
(after the fight)
Quote Originally Posted by TruthIs:

NEVER Underestimate the heart of a champion
 
 
 
 
Carl Froch
 
 
Hey Jermaine who is Carl Froch.......
 
Quote Originally Posted by TruthIs:

nutty rich doesnt want to lose his covers posting priviledges
 
Quote Originally Posted by TruthIs:

nutty rich is a biatch
 
 
 
says he wont post anymore then takes it back
 
 
this is nuttyrich
 
Quote Originally Posted by TruthIs:

haha on top of it it was him who offered it now he wants to back out haha what a joke u are nuttyrich
 
 
 
Quote Originally Posted by TruthIs:

 

ur a idiot

 

it was obvious froch would get to jermaine in the later rounds and thats how i had it also as i had froch by ko between rounds 10-12 for +1080.Its called the heart of a champion bro!

 
Quote Originally Posted by TruthIs:

rich u should never post again coward
 
 
not a man oif your word embarasment
 
Quote Originally Posted by TruthIs:

thats what u get for posting in the middle of the 9th round when Taylor was up big
 
 
trying to trick the covers cummunity
Did he mean Community? lol
 
Quote Originally Posted by TruthIs:

 u wanted credit after taylor was up big and u thought he would win
 
 
 
low class
 
I'll be posting and reading on next weeks bouts, and definitely on the Hatton vs PacMan. I'll be reading most of posters, but I feels a few might depart after tonite... maybe the daily I want to kick the dog style poster!
 
 
 
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 39
Posted: #14
Gotta say, after the in-depth the posts "TruthIs" did, he's wanted for the analysis he does.
 
GL everyone, hope everyone did good this evening, and learned a thing or two. Let's keep learning and sharing, and the rest will come.
 
 Till next time
All Forums | Boxing
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.