I don't know. Betting against either guy usually loses you money. Mayweather's advantage is always speed, in every fight he's ever had. That won't be the case now. If Pacquiao remains the dog, I'll probably take him. I was firmly on Mayweather before the Cotto fight, but seeing Pacquiao's chin hold up to Cotto in the early rounds has made me waver significantly. Do you have a strong opinion?
I've never been to a fight in Vegas before. I've been to a ton of fights in AC, NY, and CT, but I never went to Vegas for one. I'm actually more inclined to go to Dallas if the fight is there. I think that would be an amazing spectacle. I read on maxboxing that they plan on selling closed circuit tickets for $100. That's kind of crazy. And they better give us a great undercard for this fight. This will be the most watched fight in years, and a great opportunity to showcase how great boxing can be.
Also, in a total change of topic, check out this other news bit from Rafael's chat today:
On Jan. 16 Top Rank's new series will kick off live on Fox Sports en Espanol. They will have 36 shows in 2010. Three per month. Saturday nights from 10 pm ET to midnight (maybe a few 11 pm starts). Two cards will come from US sites, one from a Mexico site. All three will air live on Fox Sports en Espanol. Fox Sports Net in English will carry at least one of them live on 100 percent of its affiliates. Fox Sports Net will also have access to the other two and affiliates that don't have conflicts with other programming (like a local hometown college hoops game) can also air it. First show likely will open with Josh Clottey vs. Michel Rosales. One of the early shows will feature Jorge Arce in a world title fight.
That's awesome.
I don't know. Betting against either guy usually loses you money. Mayweather's advantage is always speed, in every fight he's ever had. That won't be the case now. If Pacquiao remains the dog, I'll probably take him. I was firmly on Mayweather before the Cotto fight, but seeing Pacquiao's chin hold up to Cotto in the early rounds has made me waver significantly. Do you have a strong opinion?
I've never been to a fight in Vegas before. I've been to a ton of fights in AC, NY, and CT, but I never went to Vegas for one. I'm actually more inclined to go to Dallas if the fight is there. I think that would be an amazing spectacle. I read on maxboxing that they plan on selling closed circuit tickets for $100. That's kind of crazy. And they better give us a great undercard for this fight. This will be the most watched fight in years, and a great opportunity to showcase how great boxing can be.
Also, in a total change of topic, check out this other news bit from Rafael's chat today:
On Jan. 16 Top Rank's new series will kick off live on Fox Sports en Espanol. They will have 36 shows in 2010. Three per month. Saturday nights from 10 pm ET to midnight (maybe a few 11 pm starts). Two cards will come from US sites, one from a Mexico site. All three will air live on Fox Sports en Espanol. Fox Sports Net in English will carry at least one of them live on 100 percent of its affiliates. Fox Sports Net will also have access to the other two and affiliates that don't have conflicts with other programming (like a local hometown college hoops game) can also air it. First show likely will open with Josh Clottey vs. Michel Rosales. One of the early shows will feature Jorge Arce in a world title fight.
That's awesome.
In response to the release sent out Tuesday by Mayweather Promotions and Golden Boy Promotions which stated that Mayweather vs. Pacquiao was “in jeopardy,” Bob Arum, chairman of Top Rank, the promoter of seven-division world champion Manny Pacquiao, had the following to say: “Let’s be very clear on the real issues we differ on. It’s not about being tested. Manny is onboard with that since it’s such a major concern of Floyd Mayweather, Jr. It’s about who does the testing and the scheduling of the procedures. Manny will submit to as many random urine tests requested. Regarding the blood tests, he will subject himself to three tests; one given in January during the week the fight is formally announced, one thirty days from the fight, no later than February 13, and the final one immediately following the fight, in Manny’s locker room. The major issue related to the testing rests with which independent agency will administer these tests. The United States Anti Doping Agency (USADA) cannot do it because they will not amend its procedures to accommodate the blood testing schedule we have outlined. USADA, under its guidelines, would have the right to administer random blood tests as many times as they want up to weigh-in day and that is ludicrous.
“Our suggestion is to utilize any of the independent agencies that work with the National Football League, the National Basketball Association or Major League Baseball, since they administer drug testing for their professional athletes.”
New York-based athletic physician, Dr. Keith Pyne, a private injury
consultant for NFL athletes and those who participate in running and
combat sports, told AOL Fanhouse,
“I have more than 800 guys who are special athletes who are all
drug-tested. And the urine testing is sufficient that you won’t miss
anything, especially with performance-enhancing drugs. So, yes, I
believe that the urine testing is more than sufficient for boxing. If
you’re using steroids, it’s going to come up for sure in urine. There’s
no way it’s going to get through the liver and the kidney without being
detected.”
“If Mayweather Promotions and Golden Boy Promotions are sincere in creating ‘a level playing field,’ as they stated in their release, our recommendations should put their minds at ease,” said Arum. “If not, one has to wonder if their motives are more about leveling the fight.”
In response to the release sent out Tuesday by Mayweather Promotions and Golden Boy Promotions which stated that Mayweather vs. Pacquiao was “in jeopardy,” Bob Arum, chairman of Top Rank, the promoter of seven-division world champion Manny Pacquiao, had the following to say: “Let’s be very clear on the real issues we differ on. It’s not about being tested. Manny is onboard with that since it’s such a major concern of Floyd Mayweather, Jr. It’s about who does the testing and the scheduling of the procedures. Manny will submit to as many random urine tests requested. Regarding the blood tests, he will subject himself to three tests; one given in January during the week the fight is formally announced, one thirty days from the fight, no later than February 13, and the final one immediately following the fight, in Manny’s locker room. The major issue related to the testing rests with which independent agency will administer these tests. The United States Anti Doping Agency (USADA) cannot do it because they will not amend its procedures to accommodate the blood testing schedule we have outlined. USADA, under its guidelines, would have the right to administer random blood tests as many times as they want up to weigh-in day and that is ludicrous.
“Our suggestion is to utilize any of the independent agencies that work with the National Football League, the National Basketball Association or Major League Baseball, since they administer drug testing for their professional athletes.”
New York-based athletic physician, Dr. Keith Pyne, a private injury
consultant for NFL athletes and those who participate in running and
combat sports, told AOL Fanhouse,
“I have more than 800 guys who are special athletes who are all
drug-tested. And the urine testing is sufficient that you won’t miss
anything, especially with performance-enhancing drugs. So, yes, I
believe that the urine testing is more than sufficient for boxing. If
you’re using steroids, it’s going to come up for sure in urine. There’s
no way it’s going to get through the liver and the kidney without being
detected.”
“If Mayweather Promotions and Golden Boy Promotions are sincere in creating ‘a level playing field,’ as they stated in their release, our recommendations should put their minds at ease,” said Arum. “If not, one has to wonder if their motives are more about leveling the fight.”
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.