• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 3
      NFL Week 3
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Falcons-Packers Picks
      • Survivor Picks
      • Week 3 Odds
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Boxing

    Official Marquez-Pacquiao Scorecard

    LetMeSpin
    Smokeythebear
    p8c8p8
    HakAttack1
    LarryParker
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 416
    Posts: 12
     
    LetMeSpin
    LetMeSpin
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2007
    Posts: 1233
    Posted: Mar. 16, 2008 - 8:25 PM ET #1

    Link

    https://www.boxing2006.com/Photos/Scorecards/PacquiaoMarquezII%20003.jpg

    I'll wait for others to chime in before I give my opinion. Manny turned down a rematch when Marquez asked him in the ring. Bob Arum also declined Richard Schaeffer's offer of $6 million to fight again immediately at 135 lbs.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    Link

    https://www.boxing2006.com/Photos/Scorecards/PacquiaoMarquezII%20003.jpg

    I'll wait for others to chime in before I give my opinion. Manny turned down a rematch when Marquez asked him in the ring. Bob Arum also declined Richard Schaeffer's offer of $6 million to fight again immediately at 135 lbs.
     
    Smokeythebear
    Smokeythebear
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 1268
    Posted: Mar. 16, 2008 - 10:22 PM ET #2

    duane ford
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    duane ford
     
    p8c8p8
    p8c8p8
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2008
    Posts: 38
    Posted: Mar. 16, 2008 - 11:52 PM ET #3

    the scorecard says we got a new champ

    lets just move on to the trilogy!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    the scorecard says we got a new champ

    lets just move on to the trilogy!
     
    Smokeythebear
    Smokeythebear
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 1268
    Posted: Mar. 17, 2008 - 12:05 AM ET #4

    they'll be no rematch, top rank lowballed marquez 4 years in order for this fight not to happen and now pac-man has a reason to walk away...wont happen and even if it does marquez will not get a fair judging.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    they'll be no rematch, top rank lowballed marquez 4 years in order for this fight not to happen and now pac-man has a reason to walk away...wont happen and even if it does marquez will not get a fair judging.
     
    Smokeythebear
    Smokeythebear
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 1268
    Posted: Mar. 17, 2008 - 12:36 AM ET #5

    and to add to all the controversy, i was unaware but apparently a judge was changed the week of the fight as tom miller was switched in...interesting.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    and to add to all the controversy, i was unaware but apparently a judge was changed the week of the fight as tom miller was switched in...interesting.
     
    LetMeSpin
    LetMeSpin
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2007
    Posts: 1233
    Posted: Mar. 17, 2008 - 5:03 AM ET #6

    Quote Originally Posted by p8c8p8:

    the scorecard says we got a new champ

    lets just move on to the trilogy!


    Okay right, let's forget about the cheating and wait for the 2nd rematch that will never happen.

    To this guy scoring the fight, Marquez won rounds 1,2,5,6,7,8,11, and 12. That's 115-112. Someone try to convince 115-112 the other way is not a preposterous card.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by p8c8p8:

    the scorecard says we got a new champ

    lets just move on to the trilogy!


    Okay right, let's forget about the cheating and wait for the 2nd rematch that will never happen.

    To this guy scoring the fight, Marquez won rounds 1,2,5,6,7,8,11, and 12. That's 115-112. Someone try to convince 115-112 the other way is not a preposterous card.
     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: Mar. 17, 2008 - 5:15 AM ET #7

    Round 1 was certainly close. I had it for Pacman, but still had it 114-113 for Juan Manuel. It happens though. I had money on him, but I can't complain. He couldn't stay off the canvas and that cost him. It was a great fight and my guy didn't win. Oh well. Congrats to Pac backers
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Round 1 was certainly close. I had it for Pacman, but still had it 114-113 for Juan Manuel. It happens though. I had money on him, but I can't complain. He couldn't stay off the canvas and that cost him. It was a great fight and my guy didn't win. Oh well. Congrats to Pac backers
     
    LarryParker
    LarryParker
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2007
    Posts: 776
    Posted: Mar. 17, 2008 - 2:53 PM ET #8

    The fight at 135 would be more beneficial to Marquez, I'd give him a slightly better chance at winning.  Pac might be a tad slower and a bit more open to the counter punching.  If Marquez can carry his power, he would beat Manny, it's no mystery. 
    It's probably why there will be no third fight at 135. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    The fight at 135 would be more beneficial to Marquez, I'd give him a slightly better chance at winning.  Pac might be a tad slower and a bit more open to the counter punching.  If Marquez can carry his power, he would beat Manny, it's no mystery. 
    It's probably why there will be no third fight at 135. 
     
    G8RB8
    G8RB8
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2005
    Posts: 30086
    Posted: Mar. 17, 2008 - 4:36 PM ET #9

    Quote Originally Posted by HakAttack1:

    Round 1 was certainly close. I had it for Pacman, but still had it 114-113 for Juan Manuel.

    That's how I had it.

    Draw at the very worst.

    Bagel Sandwiches Suck
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by HakAttack1:

    Round 1 was certainly close. I had it for Pacman, but still had it 114-113 for Juan Manuel.

    That's how I had it.

    Draw at the very worst.

     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: Mar. 19, 2008 - 1:46 PM ET #10

    It was a close fight and Manny got the benefit of the doubt in the from the two judges who scored the fight for him.

    I had it 114-113 JMM, but with that said all it took was a judge seeing one round differently then I did to score the fight for Manny.

    Do I think JMM won?  Yes.  Is this one of the worst decisions that has gone against me?  No, this doesn't even make the top 10.

    This fight was an even fight from the get go, that's why it was hilarious that people were taking Manny at numbers around -200 and calling it a value at those odds.  It's people like that who make profits possible betting boxing.  I will take +160-+180 every time in a fight I feel is a true pick-em or I favor slightly to my man; it didn't work out this time, but it will over time.

    Seriously, why is Duane Ford still judging major fights?  This guy needs a pink slip.


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    It was a close fight and Manny got the benefit of the doubt in the from the two judges who scored the fight for him.

    I had it 114-113 JMM, but with that said all it took was a judge seeing one round differently then I did to score the fight for Manny.

    Do I think JMM won?  Yes.  Is this one of the worst decisions that has gone against me?  No, this doesn't even make the top 10.

    This fight was an even fight from the get go, that's why it was hilarious that people were taking Manny at numbers around -200 and calling it a value at those odds.  It's people like that who make profits possible betting boxing.  I will take +160-+180 every time in a fight I feel is a true pick-em or I favor slightly to my man; it didn't work out this time, but it will over time.

    Seriously, why is Duane Ford still judging major fights?  This guy needs a pink slip.


     
    LetMeSpin
    LetMeSpin
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2007
    Posts: 1233
    Posted: Mar. 19, 2008 - 7:06 PM ET #11

    I've stated many times that a close fight is not necessarily a difficult fight to score. If they had alternated scoring knockdowns in 10-8 rounds all the way through, the only credible card would be a draw. I know this isn't what happened, but I feel strongly that Marquez carried rounds 1,2,5,6,7,8,11, and 12. That's 8-4, and the only round I might give Pacquiao in that set is 7. There simply aren't 3 rounds in there that can go the other way. This was certainly a bad decision. There have absolutely been worse, but I don't see how anyone can argue that this was a close fight that could have gone either way. The mere fact that both guys were in the fight to the end doesn't make it close enough that Marquez should have needed to sweep the last 3 rounds to win.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I've stated many times that a close fight is not necessarily a difficult fight to score. If they had alternated scoring knockdowns in 10-8 rounds all the way through, the only credible card would be a draw. I know this isn't what happened, but I feel strongly that Marquez carried rounds 1,2,5,6,7,8,11, and 12. That's 8-4, and the only round I might give Pacquiao in that set is 7. There simply aren't 3 rounds in there that can go the other way. This was certainly a bad decision. There have absolutely been worse, but I don't see how anyone can argue that this was a close fight that could have gone either way. The mere fact that both guys were in the fight to the end doesn't make it close enough that Marquez should have needed to sweep the last 3 rounds to win.
     
     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: Mar. 20, 2008 - 5:59 PM ET #12

    Quote Originally Posted by LetMeSpin:

    I've stated many times that a close fight is not necessarily a difficult fight to score. If they had alternated scoring knockdowns in 10-8 rounds all the way through, the only credible card would be a draw. I know this isn't what happened, but I feel strongly that Marquez carried rounds 1,2,5,6,7,8,11, and 12. That's 8-4, and the only round I might give Pacquiao in that set is 7. There simply aren't 3 rounds in there that can go the other way. This was certainly a bad decision. There have absolutely been worse, but I don't see how anyone can argue that this was a close fight that could have gone either way. The mere fact that both guys were in the fight to the end doesn't make it close enough that Marquez should have needed to sweep the last 3 rounds to win.


    Completely agree with that statement in bold.

    Why all three judges scored the first for Manny is beyond me, they must have been still trying to get to their seats after hitting the concession stands.

    Watching it live I scored rounds 1,2,5,7,8,11,12 for JMM.


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by LetMeSpin:

    I've stated many times that a close fight is not necessarily a difficult fight to score. If they had alternated scoring knockdowns in 10-8 rounds all the way through, the only credible card would be a draw. I know this isn't what happened, but I feel strongly that Marquez carried rounds 1,2,5,6,7,8,11, and 12. That's 8-4, and the only round I might give Pacquiao in that set is 7. There simply aren't 3 rounds in there that can go the other way. This was certainly a bad decision. There have absolutely been worse, but I don't see how anyone can argue that this was a close fight that could have gone either way. The mere fact that both guys were in the fight to the end doesn't make it close enough that Marquez should have needed to sweep the last 3 rounds to win.


    Completely agree with that statement in bold.

    Why all three judges scored the first for Manny is beyond me, they must have been still trying to get to their seats after hitting the concession stands.

    Watching it live I scored rounds 1,2,5,7,8,11,12 for JMM.


    All Forums | Boxing

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 449,814 Covers arrow
    • Tuesday 09/22/2026 471 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 259,748 Covers arrow
    • Couple thoughts 4,038 Covers arrow
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 58,359 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 99,611 Covers arrow
    • Trump's legacy? 25,551 Covers arrow
    • Tuesday 2,691 Covers arrow
    • Something to think about Tuesday 2,289 Covers arrow
    • ?? KBO Plays 🥎 15,053 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.