Last 3 years posted at Covers: +61.53 units (+$6,153) 2009:-9.09 units (-$909) Last week: +1.5 units (+$150)
Well I disappeared last week and for good reason, my laptop may have been able to connect to the internet, but I couldn't see a dang thing. Screen went bad, but I guess that is expected with a three year old laptop. Just got it back today with a new monitor so I am once again up and running. Rough week last week overall, but the one play that really needed to come through did to give me a winning week, but even it was much closer then I ever expected. Right now I'm just on one play, but I really haven't had time to look at much seeing as how I am just now back in touch with technology.
2 units on Miguel Vazquez (+250) vs Prescott
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Last 3 years posted at Covers: +61.53 units (+$6,153) 2009:-9.09 units (-$909) Last week: +1.5 units (+$150)
Well I disappeared last week and for good reason, my laptop may have been able to connect to the internet, but I couldn't see a dang thing. Screen went bad, but I guess that is expected with a three year old laptop. Just got it back today with a new monitor so I am once again up and running. Rough week last week overall, but the one play that really needed to come through did to give me a winning week, but even it was much closer then I ever expected. Right now I'm just on one play, but I really haven't had time to look at much seeing as how I am just now back in touch with technology.
Yeah close fucking play man....but a solis killed the sweet victory for me again...I am swearing of f all solis's like i swore of screwing big women cause they have big tits......
goodluck on this play man....seems like a good one...when your only losses is two competitive losses to saul alvarez and a loss to a techincally superior skilled tim bradley, those losses look better then a khan lucky win
0
Yeah close fucking play man....but a solis killed the sweet victory for me again...I am swearing of f all solis's like i swore of screwing big women cause they have big tits......
goodluck on this play man....seems like a good one...when your only losses is two competitive losses to saul alvarez and a loss to a techincally superior skilled tim bradley, those losses look better then a khan lucky win
Yeah close fucking play man....but a solis killed the sweet victory for me again...I am swearing of f all solis's like i swore of screwing big women cause they have big tits......
goodluck on this play man....seems like a good one...when your only losses is two competitive losses to saul alvarez and a loss to a techincally superior skilled tim bradley, those losses look better then a khan lucky win
Classic, lol.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Cee_MoNeY:
Yeah close fucking play man....but a solis killed the sweet victory for me again...I am swearing of f all solis's like i swore of screwing big women cause they have big tits......
goodluck on this play man....seems like a good one...when your only losses is two competitive losses to saul alvarez and a loss to a techincally superior skilled tim bradley, those losses look better then a khan lucky win
Think this is the final slate for the weekend, lot more action then I thought I would have with the smaller slate....
.75 of a unit on Vazquez Jr. by 12rd decision (+299) .75 of a unit on McIntosh (+400) vs Cleverly 2.4 units on under 7.5 rounds (-120) in Enzo-Lebedev 1.5 units on Small (+130) vs Hall 1 unit on Kotelnik ITD (+289) 2.5 units on under 9.5 rounds (-125) in Rojas-Morales
0
Think this is the final slate for the weekend, lot more action then I thought I would have with the smaller slate....
.75 of a unit on Vazquez Jr. by 12rd decision (+299) .75 of a unit on McIntosh (+400) vs Cleverly 2.4 units on under 7.5 rounds (-120) in Enzo-Lebedev 1.5 units on Small (+130) vs Hall 1 unit on Kotelnik ITD (+289) 2.5 units on under 9.5 rounds (-125) in Rojas-Morales
2 units on Miguel Vazquez (+250) vs Prescott .30 of a unit on the DRAW (+1900) in Vazquez-Prescott .75 of a unit on Vazquez Jr. by 12rd decision (+299)
Great start to the weekend. That's the real Prescott ladies and gentlemen, the same one who struggled and looked lost at time getting a SD against Abril last year on FNF.
Reads like Vazquez Jr. dominated and hopefully convinced Santos to hang them. I thought he would be game tonight in a loss, but apparently the gameness in him is long gone.
0
2 units on Miguel Vazquez (+250) vs Prescott .30 of a unit on the DRAW (+1900) in Vazquez-Prescott .75 of a unit on Vazquez Jr. by 12rd decision (+299)
Great start to the weekend. That's the real Prescott ladies and gentlemen, the same one who struggled and looked lost at time getting a SD against Abril last year on FNF.
Reads like Vazquez Jr. dominated and hopefully convinced Santos to hang them. I thought he would be game tonight in a loss, but apparently the gameness in him is long gone.
Think this is the final slate for the weekend, lot more action then I thought I would have with the smaller slate....
.75 of a unit on Vazquez Jr. by 12rd decision (+299) .75 of a unit on McIntosh (+400) vs Cleverly 2.4 units on under 7.5 rounds (-120) in Enzo-Lebedev 1.5 units on Small (+130) vs Hall 1 unit on Kotelnik ITD (+289) 2.5 units on under 9.5 rounds (-125) in Rojas-Morales
not a big fan of clevery myself but i gotta check that one out more, rojas and morales o/u is a toss up....i gotta agree if you bet that enzo fight its better to take the under then any side....i didnt see that desicion bet for vasquez and i wish i would have played on it...
goodluck and i like your line up
0
Quote Originally Posted by Fullbrights:
Think this is the final slate for the weekend, lot more action then I thought I would have with the smaller slate....
.75 of a unit on Vazquez Jr. by 12rd decision (+299) .75 of a unit on McIntosh (+400) vs Cleverly 2.4 units on under 7.5 rounds (-120) in Enzo-Lebedev 1.5 units on Small (+130) vs Hall 1 unit on Kotelnik ITD (+289) 2.5 units on under 9.5 rounds (-125) in Rojas-Morales
not a big fan of clevery myself but i gotta check that one out more, rojas and morales o/u is a toss up....i gotta agree if you bet that enzo fight its better to take the under then any side....i didnt see that desicion bet for vasquez and i wish i would have played on it...
not a big fan of clevery myself but i gotta check that one out more, rojas and morales o/u is a toss up....i gotta agree if you bet that enzo fight its better to take the under then any side....i didnt see that desicion bet for vasquez and i wish i would have played on it...
goodluck and i like your line up
I watched some footage of Cleverly and Mcintosh earlier tonight. It's a value play for me, I think the odds are a bit wide. Cleverly is likely to outbox him, but McIntosh seems awfully awkward and rugged. I think he hurts Cleverly at some point and it's worth a small play to see what happens from there.
As for the Rojas-Morales under, I think the fact that Rojas is the naturally bigger guy and Morales is on his last leg will spell an early ending in a fight where I think plenty of leather will be thrown.
In terms of the winner of the Enzo-Lebedev fight, your guess is as good as mine. If Lebedev was a bigger dog I would definitely be tempted to throw some down. Both guys can punch and I think the pace should be pretty good from the onset; plus, I don't think Enzo wants to go into deep waters after what happened last time out.
Actually that decision bet was for Vazquez Jr., who won by 2nd round KO, so no you wouldn't have wanted to play that.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Cee_MoNeY:
not a big fan of clevery myself but i gotta check that one out more, rojas and morales o/u is a toss up....i gotta agree if you bet that enzo fight its better to take the under then any side....i didnt see that desicion bet for vasquez and i wish i would have played on it...
goodluck and i like your line up
I watched some footage of Cleverly and Mcintosh earlier tonight. It's a value play for me, I think the odds are a bit wide. Cleverly is likely to outbox him, but McIntosh seems awfully awkward and rugged. I think he hurts Cleverly at some point and it's worth a small play to see what happens from there.
As for the Rojas-Morales under, I think the fact that Rojas is the naturally bigger guy and Morales is on his last leg will spell an early ending in a fight where I think plenty of leather will be thrown.
In terms of the winner of the Enzo-Lebedev fight, your guess is as good as mine. If Lebedev was a bigger dog I would definitely be tempted to throw some down. Both guys can punch and I think the pace should be pretty good from the onset; plus, I don't think Enzo wants to go into deep waters after what happened last time out.
Actually that decision bet was for Vazquez Jr., who won by 2nd round KO, so no you wouldn't have wanted to play that.
Congrats Brights Enzo got starched in 3 rounds the UNDER hits with ease !
yeah congrats man....i was being a box all day to bet that fight...i was gonna take the under and parlay it but then i was gonna go against enzo....when i decided to bet it before the previous betting time the fight was pulled off 5dimes.....wasnt gonna bet to much but it would have been a $300 win......
0
Quote Originally Posted by ghostkid:
Congrats Brights Enzo got starched in 3 rounds the UNDER hits with ease !
yeah congrats man....i was being a box all day to bet that fight...i was gonna take the under and parlay it but then i was gonna go against enzo....when i decided to bet it before the previous betting time the fight was pulled off 5dimes.....wasnt gonna bet to much but it would have been a $300 win......
1 unit on Kotelnik ITD (+289) 1 unit on Kotelnik (+300)
Congrats Khan backers. The kid executed his plan well.
Up just over 5 hundo for the week. Now time to wait on a result from Mexico tonight.
nice week...i definately understand why you bet kotenlik small.....if i didnt have gotten khan early i would have to or just taken khan by desicion....
0
Quote Originally Posted by Fullbrights:
1 unit on Kotelnik ITD (+289) 1 unit on Kotelnik (+300)
Congrats Khan backers. The kid executed his plan well.
Up just over 5 hundo for the week. Now time to wait on a result from Mexico tonight.
nice week...i definately understand why you bet kotenlik small.....if i didnt have gotten khan early i would have to or just taken khan by desicion....
nice week...i definately understand why you bet kotenlik small.....if i didnt have gotten khan early i would have to or just taken khan by desicion....
Yeah, I had to at the odds with some of the people that Khan had been down against. Way to stick with your gut man, Khan did what he had to do. I think the best bet against Khan will always be an unconventional guy with a punch, Kotelnik wasn't that guy, but there will be some down the road. I'm not sold on his power at 140 either.
Rojas got it done for me just in time for the under to round out a great week. It's going to be a slow week for boxing this weekend.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Cee_MoNeY:
nice week...i definately understand why you bet kotenlik small.....if i didnt have gotten khan early i would have to or just taken khan by desicion....
Yeah, I had to at the odds with some of the people that Khan had been down against. Way to stick with your gut man, Khan did what he had to do. I think the best bet against Khan will always be an unconventional guy with a punch, Kotelnik wasn't that guy, but there will be some down the road. I'm not sold on his power at 140 either.
Rojas got it done for me just in time for the under to round out a great week. It's going to be a slow week for boxing this weekend.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.