Oliver McCall vs Lance Whitaker
Whitaker +325
Fonseca wins 10 round decision +100
I know that McCall vs Whitaker isn't on the Showtime card, should read "Showtime pick." It won't be on TV either.
Adding: Moore vs Rhodes under 9.5, -135. Should be a war - both guys have pop and very iffy chins.
I know that McCall vs Whitaker isn't on the Showtime card, should read "Showtime pick." It won't be on TV either.
Adding: Moore vs Rhodes under 9.5, -135. Should be a war - both guys have pop and very iffy chins.
didnt watch the fight but that sounds way too close........if fonseca barely pulled it out the he aint worth of ish either
didnt watch the fight but that sounds way too close........if fonseca barely pulled it out the he aint worth of ish either
these prospect are hyped up and never earn there heart......thats why it is so hard to bet these prospect even though they are deemed locks....
the fact showtime brought on seeger was a shock to me.......seeger has never been a legit prospect and his ranking is bullshit......just glad this ended and didnt go to the cards.....
hopefully for both of us green mccall loses by decison..like nutty said he aint getting ko'd
these prospect are hyped up and never earn there heart......thats why it is so hard to bet these prospect even though they are deemed locks....
the fact showtime brought on seeger was a shock to me.......seeger has never been a legit prospect and his ranking is bullshit......just glad this ended and didnt go to the cards.....
hopefully for both of us green mccall loses by decison..like nutty said he aint getting ko'd
from what i hear mcall won a very very close as in one point close ud on 2 or 3 of the judges scorecards....mccall was gases after round 2 after he had whitaker hurt and down but not finished..apparanently it was a close fight with whitaker should have been the winner in a close descion but not enough of a robbery to make a difference......
dam should of played the over at least he had the right idea
from what i hear mcall won a very very close as in one point close ud on 2 or 3 of the judges scorecards....mccall was gases after round 2 after he had whitaker hurt and down but not finished..apparanently it was a close fight with whitaker should have been the winner in a close descion but not enough of a robbery to make a difference......
dam should of played the over at least he had the right idea
Fonseca was clearly winning the fight, the cards were silly. I'll agree with Nutty he didn't look much better than the shot Seeger. Tough break on Whitaker.
I'm adding 3 units to the over 8.5 in the Tomasz/Golota fight.
Fonseca was clearly winning the fight, the cards were silly. I'll agree with Nutty he didn't look much better than the shot Seeger. Tough break on Whitaker.
I'm adding 3 units to the over 8.5 in the Tomasz/Golota fight.
from what i hear mcall won a very very close as in one point close ud on 2 or 3 of the judges scorecards....mccall was gases after round 2 after he had whitaker hurt and down but not finished..apparanently it was a close fight with whitaker should have been the winner in a close descion but not enough of a robbery to make a difference......
dam should of played the over at least he had the right idea
from what i hear mcall won a very very close as in one point close ud on 2 or 3 of the judges scorecards....mccall was gases after round 2 after he had whitaker hurt and down but not finished..apparanently it was a close fight with whitaker should have been the winner in a close descion but not enough of a robbery to make a difference......
dam should of played the over at least he had the right idea
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.