Last week was great going 12-19
for +5.688 units. And I know the plays like the double result ties
aren't for everyone but I'm sticking with them. In week 3 if BC had hit
the FG at the half instead of blowing the hold I woulda hit a play of
BC/EDM FH tie to BC (game) ML at +2500 risking 0.05 units. I was pissed
that it lost on a goofy play like that. But the football powers shined
on me in week two as the LIONS and ESKS tied 10-10 at the half and with
BC eventually winning I pulled in +1.25 units on the same tiny lil 0.05
unit risk.
Alright
enough about last week...well kinda. Lsat week I said this weeks card
looks tricky and I still believe that,especially tonights game. But
after what I've seen through the first month I believe the play today is
the under,with some plays on the ESKIES mixed in. The AL's look like
they have completely given up on their head coach. They aren't playing
with heart or passion and they continue to take foolish penalties over
and over with zero discipline or fear of reprisal from their staff.
Now
they have more than enough talent with AC behind centre and at least 3
top shelf receivers in Richardson,Green Bruce and London. As well as a
few good backs. But I just can't back this team right now especially
with the worst pro coach I can remember in years,Dan "I love to eat CA"
HAWKINS. He is a complete fool and it seems the AL's players tend to
agree with me. I have never put a coaches futility into my capping as
much as I have the past couple weeks,but I will again with this goof cuz
it seems to be working. And I'm not big on conspiracies in sports but
reading between the lines and the tone of voice in some players voices
in interviews. I would not be at all surprised to see this team lay
another sideways dump on the field again just to make sure this clown
gets the hoof tomorrow.
On
the other side of the ball is an ESKS team thats pretty much what I
expected when I said pre-season and several times since that they'd
finish last in the league. However at this point at least they're
playing with heart. And have stayed in the game two weeks in a row to a
very solid all around BC team that plays well in every aspect of the
game.
So
for tonight I'm not gonna overthink things too much and go with the
UNDER as the anchor and mix in some money on the ESKS too.
Calling it ESKIES 24 to MON 21............and for a bonus 1,000,00 points....in o.t
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Last week was great going 12-19
for +5.688 units. And I know the plays like the double result ties
aren't for everyone but I'm sticking with them. In week 3 if BC had hit
the FG at the half instead of blowing the hold I woulda hit a play of
BC/EDM FH tie to BC (game) ML at +2500 risking 0.05 units. I was pissed
that it lost on a goofy play like that. But the football powers shined
on me in week two as the LIONS and ESKS tied 10-10 at the half and with
BC eventually winning I pulled in +1.25 units on the same tiny lil 0.05
unit risk.
Alright
enough about last week...well kinda. Lsat week I said this weeks card
looks tricky and I still believe that,especially tonights game. But
after what I've seen through the first month I believe the play today is
the under,with some plays on the ESKIES mixed in. The AL's look like
they have completely given up on their head coach. They aren't playing
with heart or passion and they continue to take foolish penalties over
and over with zero discipline or fear of reprisal from their staff.
Now
they have more than enough talent with AC behind centre and at least 3
top shelf receivers in Richardson,Green Bruce and London. As well as a
few good backs. But I just can't back this team right now especially
with the worst pro coach I can remember in years,Dan "I love to eat CA"
HAWKINS. He is a complete fool and it seems the AL's players tend to
agree with me. I have never put a coaches futility into my capping as
much as I have the past couple weeks,but I will again with this goof cuz
it seems to be working. And I'm not big on conspiracies in sports but
reading between the lines and the tone of voice in some players voices
in interviews. I would not be at all surprised to see this team lay
another sideways dump on the field again just to make sure this clown
gets the hoof tomorrow.
On
the other side of the ball is an ESKS team thats pretty much what I
expected when I said pre-season and several times since that they'd
finish last in the league. However at this point at least they're
playing with heart. And have stayed in the game two weeks in a row to a
very solid all around BC team that plays well in every aspect of the
game.
So
for tonight I'm not gonna overthink things too much and go with the
UNDER as the anchor and mix in some money on the ESKS too.
Calling it ESKIES 24 to MON 21............and for a bonus 1,000,00 points....in o.t
Lost about -0.75 units for the day.....woulda been a huge rake had EDM not garbage the bed on the final few plays of the game and punded that ball in there.....and if Kavis hadn't wasted his timeouts........but I digress.
Still up a nickel on the year and have my fave 3 plays of the week on the cue.......see ya'll tomorry
0
Lost about -0.75 units for the day.....woulda been a huge rake had EDM not garbage the bed on the final few plays of the game and punded that ball in there.....and if Kavis hadn't wasted his timeouts........but I digress.
Still up a nickel on the year and have my fave 3 plays of the week on the cue.......see ya'll tomorry
Can someone please explain to me how the BlowBummers win tomorrow ?? Even at home agaist CAL's 3rd stringer how does WINNY's backup get it done............ 'll take BLM over Goltz all day.
Not locked in so let me know why WIN takes the W on Friday night.....thanx
0
Can someone please explain to me how the BlowBummers win tomorrow ?? Even at home agaist CAL's 3rd stringer how does WINNY's backup get it done............ 'll take BLM over Goltz all day.
Not locked in so let me know why WIN takes the W on Friday night.....thanx
The line seems to be spiking on the STAMPS. I have been leaning hard towards them all week but I'm getting a lil scurred off with the current line movement.
I woulda been hammering them if Tate"r" starts,a lil less if Glenn-Abbey goes but I'm somewhat on the fence if/when Boo Levis "red tab" Bitchell gets the nod.
Still as I said earlier in the week I believe that all 3 of the CAL q.b's are better than Goltz so I'm locking in now.
Taking CAL -5.5 -110 to win 1 unit.....also looking at 1st Q and FH but they're currently OTB
0
The line seems to be spiking on the STAMPS. I have been leaning hard towards them all week but I'm getting a lil scurred off with the current line movement.
I woulda been hammering them if Tate"r" starts,a lil less if Glenn-Abbey goes but I'm somewhat on the fence if/when Boo Levis "red tab" Bitchell gets the nod.
Still as I said earlier in the week I believe that all 3 of the CAL q.b's are better than Goltz so I'm locking in now.
Taking CAL -5.5 -110 to win 1 unit.....also looking at 1st Q and FH but they're currently OTB
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.