First play is Montreal Alouttes +2.5. I considered ML but only the play ATS. They fit the same point spread differential that Winnipeg fit on 8/3.
The next game has so many strong angles that make me feel great about the plays. We are taking SAS Roughriders +11.5 (i just bet this line at 5Dimes) and UNDER 57.5 (just bet this line at CRIS).
THREE angles support backing SAS Roughriders -
- Dogs on a losing streak and a total of 49+ are 181-120 ATS since 2005 and 6-2 this year!
- Total of 54-58, and the opponent is 60%+ win %, team is 0-59% win %, teams are a crazy 76-36 ATS and 2-0 this year.
-Due to the 57.5-11.5 spread differential of 46, this game also falls int he spread dif angle.
I feel great about the Roughrider play wether it cashes or not.
UNDER 57.5 is supported with a great High Total angle I have found - since 2005 if the total is between 50.5 and 62 and the visiting team has a 54% or less win %, the UNDER is 168-82 and 4-2 this year.
BOL.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
We have 3 plays for 8/4.
First play is Montreal Alouttes +2.5. I considered ML but only the play ATS. They fit the same point spread differential that Winnipeg fit on 8/3.
The next game has so many strong angles that make me feel great about the plays. We are taking SAS Roughriders +11.5 (i just bet this line at 5Dimes) and UNDER 57.5 (just bet this line at CRIS).
THREE angles support backing SAS Roughriders -
- Dogs on a losing streak and a total of 49+ are 181-120 ATS since 2005 and 6-2 this year!
- Total of 54-58, and the opponent is 60%+ win %, team is 0-59% win %, teams are a crazy 76-36 ATS and 2-0 this year.
-Due to the 57.5-11.5 spread differential of 46, this game also falls int he spread dif angle.
I feel great about the Roughrider play wether it cashes or not.
UNDER 57.5 is supported with a great High Total angle I have found - since 2005 if the total is between 50.5 and 62 and the visiting team has a 54% or less win %, the UNDER is 168-82 and 4-2 this year.
Hi gomel..... SAS to UNDER is still a play under your lines. But play at your own risk. My official lines that I bet were 11.5 and 57.5 so that is the only line that I will endorse on here.
My criteria and work ups still have SAS to UNDER as a play with your lines.
BOL.
0
Hi gomel..... SAS to UNDER is still a play under your lines. But play at your own risk. My official lines that I bet were 11.5 and 57.5 so that is the only line that I will endorse on here.
My criteria and work ups still have SAS to UNDER as a play with your lines.
Hi gomel..... SAS to UNDER is still a play under your lines. But play at your own risk. My official lines that I bet were 11.5 and 57.5 so that is the only line that I will endorse on here.
My criteria and work ups still have SAS to UNDER as a play with your lines.
BOL.
Tailing ALL 3 I bought the lines to match yours...Lets gooo
0
Quote Originally Posted by DannerB7:
Hi gomel..... SAS to UNDER is still a play under your lines. But play at your own risk. My official lines that I bet were 11.5 and 57.5 so that is the only line that I will endorse on here.
My criteria and work ups still have SAS to UNDER as a play with your lines.
BOL.
Tailing ALL 3 I bought the lines to match yours...Lets gooo
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.