EDMONTON -7 ( 3 units ) Who would of thought a month ago that I'd be backing the Eskimos laying a touchdown. Under these circumstances I think it's a good bet. Both these teams are heading in opposite directions. The Bluebombers have been eliminated from post season play and the Esky's are still in the hunt. Winnipeg will start Purdue product Joey Elliot. The report out of Edmonton is that Zabransky will get the start for Edmonton. I don't mind that one bit. I was a big fan of him at Boise st and he will develop into a very good CFL QB.
CALGARY -4 ( 2 units ) This line looks like an underlay to me. In reality this line probably would of been closer to -8 had the Stampeders not clinched the west . I don't think the Stamps will fold in front of their fans. If anything they dump next weeks game at Winnipeg.
BC - 4 ( 1 unit ) I've been on the wrong side of BC four times this year. I hope they don't let me down when it counts.
GL EVERYONE
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
CFL 2010 YTD 28-18 ( +19.5 units )
EDMONTON -7 ( 3 units ) Who would of thought a month ago that I'd be backing the Eskimos laying a touchdown. Under these circumstances I think it's a good bet. Both these teams are heading in opposite directions. The Bluebombers have been eliminated from post season play and the Esky's are still in the hunt. Winnipeg will start Purdue product Joey Elliot. The report out of Edmonton is that Zabransky will get the start for Edmonton. I don't mind that one bit. I was a big fan of him at Boise st and he will develop into a very good CFL QB.
CALGARY -4 ( 2 units ) This line looks like an underlay to me. In reality this line probably would of been closer to -8 had the Stampeders not clinched the west . I don't think the Stamps will fold in front of their fans. If anything they dump next weeks game at Winnipeg.
BC - 4 ( 1 unit ) I've been on the wrong side of BC four times this year. I hope they don't let me down when it counts.
I'm going to pass on the card this week but I was looking at Edmonton for the same reasons you were. Unfortunately the line has ballooned to 8.5 for me.
GL 44.
0
I'm going to pass on the card this week but I was looking at Edmonton for the same reasons you were. Unfortunately the line has ballooned to 8.5 for me.
I'm going to pass on the card this week but I was looking at Edmonton for the same reasons you were. Unfortunately the line has ballooned to 8.5 for me.
GL 44.
I noticed you didn't play anything. I had to buy half a point and bring it down to 7. I could of got 6.5 early in the week but like you i waited too long.Sometimes i think i can outsmart the move and it backfires on me.
gl next week.
0
Quote Originally Posted by andarmac99:
I'm going to pass on the card this week but I was looking at Edmonton for the same reasons you were. Unfortunately the line has ballooned to 8.5 for me.
GL 44.
I noticed you didn't play anything. I had to buy half a point and bring it down to 7. I could of got 6.5 early in the week but like you i waited too long.Sometimes i think i can outsmart the move and it backfires on me.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.