SASKATCHEWAN +2 ( 3 units ) pod Just the thought of getting points at Mosiac stadium is enough for me to make this my best bet of the week. The Roughriders are 20-7 SU at home in the last 3 years. It's a tough place for any road team to come in here and win. Just ask Montreal ? I'm gonna dismiss last weeks performance by the Roughies and blame it on defensive coordinator Ritchie Hall. Other than the 3 picks by Durant i think he played OK. Haven't played it yet because i think this total might fall . I'm also leaning OVER in this game. We might see a combined 80 pass attempts.
TORONTO + 1.5 ( 1 unit ) Both teams coming off straight up road wins as dogs so I'm all about fading the home favorite in the next game. I was probably more impressed by Toronto's defense more than anything else. Buck Pierce didn't look too sharp . He overthrew a lot of his receivers and at one point got blind sided. It wouldn't surprise me if his bells are still ringing. This might make him more hesitant this week. The last thing I'd want on my team an unstable QB. As long as Chet Lemon doesn't go down field too often. We'll be OK.
CONGRATS TO "BADLANDS" on going 6-0 He did a great job of pumping up the CFL forum in WEEK 1.
I'm posting all my plays for WEEK 2 on this thread including Half time wager. If i add anything, i will post it here.
GOOD LUCK
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
YTD 3-1 ( +1.95 units )
5u 0-0 4u 0-0 3u 0-0 2u 0-0 1u 3-1
SASKATCHEWAN +2 ( 3 units ) pod Just the thought of getting points at Mosiac stadium is enough for me to make this my best bet of the week. The Roughriders are 20-7 SU at home in the last 3 years. It's a tough place for any road team to come in here and win. Just ask Montreal ? I'm gonna dismiss last weeks performance by the Roughies and blame it on defensive coordinator Ritchie Hall. Other than the 3 picks by Durant i think he played OK. Haven't played it yet because i think this total might fall . I'm also leaning OVER in this game. We might see a combined 80 pass attempts.
TORONTO + 1.5 ( 1 unit ) Both teams coming off straight up road wins as dogs so I'm all about fading the home favorite in the next game. I was probably more impressed by Toronto's defense more than anything else. Buck Pierce didn't look too sharp . He overthrew a lot of his receivers and at one point got blind sided. It wouldn't surprise me if his bells are still ringing. This might make him more hesitant this week. The last thing I'd want on my team an unstable QB. As long as Chet Lemon doesn't go down field too often. We'll be OK.
CONGRATS TO "BADLANDS" on going 6-0 He did a great job of pumping up the CFL forum in WEEK 1.
I'm posting all my plays for WEEK 2 on this thread including Half time wager. If i add anything, i will post it here.
thaks bud, gl this week ill definitely be on toronto im really liking them this year. boring but effective. i love the over in skatch. surprised to see that dropping. not sold on skatch getting pressure on the qb though . i m just gonna hope they both get to 27.
0
thaks bud, gl this week ill definitely be on toronto im really liking them this year. boring but effective. i love the over in skatch. surprised to see that dropping. not sold on skatch getting pressure on the qb though . i m just gonna hope they both get to 27.
One thought about Sask - Durant threw 3 picks to the team that had the lowest interception ttl of any team last year, and on several occasions he overthrew open receivers.
Maybe he will be better this week, but Montreal is similar to Ed, Accurate QB with big tall receivers who can out jump Sask.
Maybe Sask was looking ahead to this game and over looked Ed, who knows.
GL with your pick of the week.
I think that Toronto play is pretty good idea
0
One thought about Sask - Durant threw 3 picks to the team that had the lowest interception ttl of any team last year, and on several occasions he overthrew open receivers.
Maybe he will be better this week, but Montreal is similar to Ed, Accurate QB with big tall receivers who can out jump Sask.
Maybe Sask was looking ahead to this game and over looked Ed, who knows.
One thought about Sask - Durant threw 3 picks to the team that had the lowest interception ttl of any team last year, and on several occasions he overthrew open receivers.
Maybe he will be better this week, but Montreal is similar to Ed, Accurate QB with big tall receivers who can out jump Sask.
Maybe Sask was looking ahead to this game and over looked Ed, who knows.
GL with your pick of the week.
I think that Toronto play is pretty good idea
He threw for 339 and that was 2nd best to Lulay in WEEK 1 with 8 less attempts. He doesn't lack confidence. He seems to step up in big games but the defense has to put some pressure on AC. Good teams with bad games usually bounce back the next week. Coaching staff probably not too happy giving up 42 points in WEEK 1
0
Quote Originally Posted by Powerz:
One thought about Sask - Durant threw 3 picks to the team that had the lowest interception ttl of any team last year, and on several occasions he overthrew open receivers.
Maybe he will be better this week, but Montreal is similar to Ed, Accurate QB with big tall receivers who can out jump Sask.
Maybe Sask was looking ahead to this game and over looked Ed, who knows.
GL with your pick of the week.
I think that Toronto play is pretty good idea
He threw for 339 and that was 2nd best to Lulay in WEEK 1 with 8 less attempts. He doesn't lack confidence. He seems to step up in big games but the defense has to put some pressure on AC. Good teams with bad games usually bounce back the next week. Coaching staff probably not too happy giving up 42 points in WEEK 1
I agree with your picks. Also like EDM at home but up in the air about CAL and BC? Should be really tight, could go either way. Laying off that one. BOL!!!
0
I agree with your picks. Also like EDM at home but up in the air about CAL and BC? Should be really tight, could go either way. Laying off that one. BOL!!!
Tor.-1 on mine now, Sask.is getting 3 with o/u 54.5,these games are friday and saturday night right?
No wnba tonight?
Got a great number with the Argos ( smaller play ) and a bad number with the Roughriders ( could of gotten 3 if i waited ) Hindsight is 20/20 i normally play my games on Tuesday for the CFL and don't worry too much about getting the short end of the the number. I'd say most times I'll get the better of it.
GL JEG
0
Quote Originally Posted by JEG53:
Tor.-1 on mine now, Sask.is getting 3 with o/u 54.5,these games are friday and saturday night right?
No wnba tonight?
Got a great number with the Argos ( smaller play ) and a bad number with the Roughriders ( could of gotten 3 if i waited ) Hindsight is 20/20 i normally play my games on Tuesday for the CFL and don't worry too much about getting the short end of the the number. I'd say most times I'll get the better of it.
no ones mentioned the total in the argos bombers game, under has covered 8 out of the last 10 meetings. When these two teams matchup it's always a defensive battle. Both teams have solid run Defences and arn't exactly capable of airing it out, although Lemon had some nice touch passes last game.
Like the argos to win a close low scoring game.
0
no ones mentioned the total in the argos bombers game, under has covered 8 out of the last 10 meetings. When these two teams matchup it's always a defensive battle. Both teams have solid run Defences and arn't exactly capable of airing it out, although Lemon had some nice touch passes last game.
no ones mentioned the total in the argos bombers game, under has covered 8 out of the last 10 meetings. When these two teams matchup it's always a defensive battle. Both teams have solid run Defences and arn't exactly capable of airing it out, although Lemon had some nice touch passes last game.
Like the argos to win a close low scoring game.
You are absolutely correct. Boyd's gonna get a lot of touches and you know them CFL clocks hardly take a break.
0
Quote Originally Posted by gabemorency:
no ones mentioned the total in the argos bombers game, under has covered 8 out of the last 10 meetings. When these two teams matchup it's always a defensive battle. Both teams have solid run Defences and arn't exactly capable of airing it out, although Lemon had some nice touch passes last game.
Like the argos to win a close low scoring game.
You are absolutely correct. Boyd's gonna get a lot of touches and you know them CFL clocks hardly take a break.
The BC WRs have dropped atleast 5 easy big play catches, I can't see them dropping another 5. Plus Calgary has only moved the ball off screens and burris bootlegs, easy halftime adjustment for Buono.
0
I like BC -2 for the 2nd half.
The BC WRs have dropped atleast 5 easy big play catches, I can't see them dropping another 5. Plus Calgary has only moved the ball off screens and burris bootlegs, easy halftime adjustment for Buono.
The BC WRs have dropped atleast 5 easy big play catches, I can't see them dropping another 5. Plus Calgary has only moved the ball off screens and burris bootlegs, easy halftime adjustment for Buono.
ON THE OTHER SIDE. BUONO IS THE SECOND WORST COACH IN THE LEAGUE AFTER BARKER .
0
Quote Originally Posted by gabemorency:
I like BC -2 for the 2nd half.
The BC WRs have dropped atleast 5 easy big play catches, I can't see them dropping another 5. Plus Calgary has only moved the ball off screens and burris bootlegs, easy halftime adjustment for Buono.
ON THE OTHER SIDE. BUONO IS THE SECOND WORST COACH IN THE LEAGUE AFTER BARKER .
BC 2ND half. Lulay hasn't had much help. I understand that his WRs are young.........but they still should be able to grab the damn ball.........no? Calgary has done nothing. BC has done less.
BC Defense dominates the 2nd half. Good Luck.
0
BC 2ND half. Lulay hasn't had much help. I understand that his WRs are young.........but they still should be able to grab the damn ball.........no? Calgary has done nothing. BC has done less.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.