Not over thinking this one too much. MON is gonna roll over the Bombers. WINNY was getting a huge boost
from being at home in their new digs and they won't have that this
week. Add that to Buck "Handle with care" Pierce always only about 50/50
to finish the game. And now MON hosts their home opener and I think the WINNY defense gets exposed badly here. I really expect to see MON winning this game by double digits. Calling it
35-24 AL's
CFL:
(1)Double result MON FH ML to GAME ML -260 to Double result HAM FH ML to GAME ML -225 = +100 risking 1 unit
(2)Double result WIN/MON FH tie to MON GAME ML +2500 risking 0.05 units
(3)MON FH -4 -105 to win 0.25 units
(4)WIN/MON FH OVER 25.5 -110 to win 0.25 units
(5)MON (game) -7 -110 to win a half unit
(6)MON (game) ML -300 to WIN/MON OVER 52 -110 = +155 risking a half unit
(7)MON (game) ML -300 to HAM (game) ML -320 = -135 to win 2 units
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
CFL YTD: 18-11 = +6.305 UNITS
MIX-SPORT-PARLAYS W/CFL: 0-1 = -0.1 UNITS
/////////////////////
Not over thinking this one too much. MON is gonna roll over the Bombers. WINNY was getting a huge boost
from being at home in their new digs and they won't have that this
week. Add that to Buck "Handle with care" Pierce always only about 50/50
to finish the game. And now MON hosts their home opener and I think the WINNY defense gets exposed badly here. I really expect to see MON winning this game by double digits. Calling it
35-24 AL's
CFL:
(1)Double result MON FH ML to GAME ML -260 to Double result HAM FH ML to GAME ML -225 = +100 risking 1 unit
(2)Double result WIN/MON FH tie to MON GAME ML +2500 risking 0.05 units
(3)MON FH -4 -105 to win 0.25 units
(4)WIN/MON FH OVER 25.5 -110 to win 0.25 units
(5)MON (game) -7 -110 to win a half unit
(6)MON (game) ML -300 to WIN/MON OVER 52 -110 = +155 risking a half unit
(7)MON (game) ML -300 to HAM (game) ML -320 = -135 to win 2 units
I already have a few units on the AL's ML but down only 5 at the half in their home opener to a mediocre BOMBERS team I have to take a poke at them on the SH -4 -115....they technically don't even have to win. They were -300 before the game and now down one possession I get nearly 200 cents reduction on the line. I think thats an overreaction by the books.
CFL:
(1)MON SH -4 -110 to win a half unit
(2)MON SH ML -235 to WIN/MON O 25 -110 = +170 risking 0.25 units
0
Posted: 7/4/2013 8:31:37 PM
I already have a few units on the AL's ML but down only 5 at the half in their home opener to a mediocre BOMBERS team I have to take a poke at them on the SH -4 -115....they technically don't even have to win. They were -300 before the game and now down one possession I get nearly 200 cents reduction on the line. I think thats an overreaction by the books.
CFL:
(1)MON SH -4 -110 to win a half unit
(2)MON SH ML -235 to WIN/MON O 25 -110 = +170 risking 0.25 units
Whoa momma I got shitkicked in that AL's game. But I'm more in shock than pissed. They force 3 1st Q turnovers and then a few more but only manage 3 points off them AND probably should have taken the lead on the strip/fumble/6 but it was called back.
Enough of that wanking.
For the late game I gotta go with BC who is a different team at home and looked much better in the SH of their first game. And TO was putting up points and came back to win but I put more of that on the TiCats shitty D than Argonauts having a juggernaut offense. And the kicking game could be an issue. Vet backup or not Swayze has a rocket for a leg and they use it well. I don't expect a blowout but a double digit win in this league isn't a blowout so BS it is.
CFL:
(1)BC FH -4 -110 to win 0.25 units
(2)TOR/BC FH O 27 -105 to win 0.25 units
(3)Double result TOR/BC FH tie to BC GAME ML +2500 risking 0.05 units
(4)BC (game) -7 -110 to win a half unit
(5)BC (game) ML -310 to TOR/BC OVER 53.5 -110 = +150 risking a half unit
(6)Double result BC FH ML to GAME ML -225 to Double result HAM FH ML to GAME ML -260 = +100 risking a half unit
(7)BC (game) ML -310 to HAM (game) ML -320 = -135 to win 2 units
0
Whoa momma I got shitkicked in that AL's game. But I'm more in shock than pissed. They force 3 1st Q turnovers and then a few more but only manage 3 points off them AND probably should have taken the lead on the strip/fumble/6 but it was called back.
Enough of that wanking.
For the late game I gotta go with BC who is a different team at home and looked much better in the SH of their first game. And TO was putting up points and came back to win but I put more of that on the TiCats shitty D than Argonauts having a juggernaut offense. And the kicking game could be an issue. Vet backup or not Swayze has a rocket for a leg and they use it well. I don't expect a blowout but a double digit win in this league isn't a blowout so BS it is.
CFL:
(1)BC FH -4 -110 to win 0.25 units
(2)TOR/BC FH O 27 -105 to win 0.25 units
(3)Double result TOR/BC FH tie to BC GAME ML +2500 risking 0.05 units
(4)BC (game) -7 -110 to win a half unit
(5)BC (game) ML -310 to TOR/BC OVER 53.5 -110 = +150 risking a half unit
(6)Double result BC FH ML to GAME ML -225 to Double result HAM FH ML to GAME ML -260 = +100 risking a half unit
(7)BC (game) ML -310 to HAM (game) ML -320 = -135 to win 2 units
MON had a shot at the fumble recovery off the kickoff which might have been game. And then the near pick 6 by Parker who only catches the ball when he knows he's taking it to the house.
WIN played much better than I thought but the AL's lost this game more than WIN won.......thats my story and I'm sticking to it
0
MON had a shot at the fumble recovery off the kickoff which might have been game. And then the near pick 6 by Parker who only catches the ball when he knows he's taking it to the house.
WIN played much better than I thought but the AL's lost this game more than WIN won.......thats my story and I'm sticking to it
I like the LEOS to win but it seems like people love to jump on the halftime leader and the books know that and let them overreact. And I did think BC would win by DD's (still do) but with the game as it is I'm looking at TO to make a game of this.
BC wins but TO makes it a bit more of a game.
CFL:
(1)TOR SH ML +100 to TOR/BC SH OVER 26 -110 = +280 risking 0.25 units
0
Posted: 7/4/2013 11:43:06 PM
I like the LEOS to win but it seems like people love to jump on the halftime leader and the books know that and let them overreact. And I did think BC would win by DD's (still do) but with the game as it is I'm looking at TO to make a game of this.
BC wins but TO makes it a bit more of a game.
CFL:
(1)TOR SH ML +100 to TOR/BC SH OVER 26 -110 = +280 risking 0.25 units
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
