I call this the game of the year because you take what's given to you at the beginning of the year, performance throughout the year and then what's given to you at the end of the year.
Of course I won't be stupid to bet all of my winnings from this year on this game but more than the usual bet since it's the house's money.
If it wins I'll reveal my reasoning, if not, there's no point right?
Toronto Argonauts -2.5 1st half and -3.0 for the game
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I call this the game of the year because you take what's given to you at the beginning of the year, performance throughout the year and then what's given to you at the end of the year.
Of course I won't be stupid to bet all of my winnings from this year on this game but more than the usual bet since it's the house's money.
If it wins I'll reveal my reasoning, if not, there's no point right?
Toronto Argonauts -2.5 1st half and -3.0 for the game
It's quite simple. Here's the reasoning. Last year Edmonton's season win total was at 6.5. This year at the beginning of the year it came out as 7.5 yet they traded away Ricky Ray. How could this be? This was a trap. If you do some further analysis, Edmonton ended up winning 7 games so it truly did prove to be a trap. Now at the end of the season, in a playoff match, it just so happens that Ricky Ray goes against his former team. Obviously from the beginning oddsmakers (aka Randall) had no confidence that they would go over 7.5. Yes, this was just the regular season and it has nothing to do with the playoffs but you know Edmonton was not going to win this game putting them over the 7.5 total. Then the line comes out as +3.5. Another trap. There was never a doubt that Toronto would win this thing.
Now this is how it's done folks. You can question my thinking all you want but if you did and went against me you would be poor now while I just used house money and took Randall for a ride.
0
It's quite simple. Here's the reasoning. Last year Edmonton's season win total was at 6.5. This year at the beginning of the year it came out as 7.5 yet they traded away Ricky Ray. How could this be? This was a trap. If you do some further analysis, Edmonton ended up winning 7 games so it truly did prove to be a trap. Now at the end of the season, in a playoff match, it just so happens that Ricky Ray goes against his former team. Obviously from the beginning oddsmakers (aka Randall) had no confidence that they would go over 7.5. Yes, this was just the regular season and it has nothing to do with the playoffs but you know Edmonton was not going to win this game putting them over the 7.5 total. Then the line comes out as +3.5. Another trap. There was never a doubt that Toronto would win this thing.
Now this is how it's done folks. You can question my thinking all you want but if you did and went against me you would be poor now while I just used house money and took Randall for a ride.
It's quite simple. Here's the reasoning. Last year Edmonton's season win total was at 6.5. This year at the beginning of the year it came out as 7.5 yet they traded away Ricky Ray. How could this be? This was a trap. If you do some further analysis, Edmonton ended up winning 7 games so it truly did prove to be a trap. Now at the end of the season, in a playoff match, it just so happens that Ricky Ray goes against his former team. Obviously from the beginning oddsmakers (aka Randall) had no confidence that they would go over 7.5. Yes, this was just the regular season and it has nothing to do with the playoffs but you know Edmonton was not going to win this game putting them over the 7.5 total. Then the line comes out as +3.5. Another trap. There was never a doubt that Toronto would win this thing.
Now this is how it's done folks. You can question my thinking all you want but if you did and went against me you would be poor now while I just used house money and took Randall for a ride.
Ugh, I seriously had to read this like 3 times to make sense of it. Are you saying that a Edmonton win yesterday would have put them over the 7.5 season win total? I don't think that's true.
0
Quote Originally Posted by RedFlagCapper:
It's quite simple. Here's the reasoning. Last year Edmonton's season win total was at 6.5. This year at the beginning of the year it came out as 7.5 yet they traded away Ricky Ray. How could this be? This was a trap. If you do some further analysis, Edmonton ended up winning 7 games so it truly did prove to be a trap. Now at the end of the season, in a playoff match, it just so happens that Ricky Ray goes against his former team. Obviously from the beginning oddsmakers (aka Randall) had no confidence that they would go over 7.5. Yes, this was just the regular season and it has nothing to do with the playoffs but you know Edmonton was not going to win this game putting them over the 7.5 total. Then the line comes out as +3.5. Another trap. There was never a doubt that Toronto would win this thing.
Now this is how it's done folks. You can question my thinking all you want but if you did and went against me you would be poor now while I just used house money and took Randall for a ride.
Ugh, I seriously had to read this like 3 times to make sense of it. Are you saying that a Edmonton win yesterday would have put them over the 7.5 season win total? I don't think that's true.
It's quite simple. Here's the reasoning. Last year Edmonton's season win total was at 6.5. This year at the beginning of the year it came out as 7.5 yet they traded away Ricky Ray. How could this be? This was a trap. If you do some further analysis, Edmonton ended up winning 7 games so it truly did prove to be a trap. Now at the end of the season, in a playoff match, it just so happens that Ricky Ray goes against his former team. Obviously from the beginning oddsmakers (aka Randall) had no confidence that they would go over 7.5. Yes, this was just the regular season and it has nothing to do with the playoffs but you know Edmonton was not going to win this game putting them over the 7.5 total. Then the line comes out as +3.5. Another trap. There was never a doubt that Toronto would win this thing.
Now this is how it's done folks. You can question my thinking all you want but if you did and went against me you would be poor now while I just used house money and took Randall for a ride.
Yeah that was great watching our grey cup champ quarterback pick Edmonton apart.
0
Quote Originally Posted by RedFlagCapper:
It's quite simple. Here's the reasoning. Last year Edmonton's season win total was at 6.5. This year at the beginning of the year it came out as 7.5 yet they traded away Ricky Ray. How could this be? This was a trap. If you do some further analysis, Edmonton ended up winning 7 games so it truly did prove to be a trap. Now at the end of the season, in a playoff match, it just so happens that Ricky Ray goes against his former team. Obviously from the beginning oddsmakers (aka Randall) had no confidence that they would go over 7.5. Yes, this was just the regular season and it has nothing to do with the playoffs but you know Edmonton was not going to win this game putting them over the 7.5 total. Then the line comes out as +3.5. Another trap. There was never a doubt that Toronto would win this thing.
Now this is how it's done folks. You can question my thinking all you want but if you did and went against me you would be poor now while I just used house money and took Randall for a ride.
Yeah that was great watching our grey cup champ quarterback pick Edmonton apart.
It's quite simple. Here's the reasoning. Last year Edmonton's season win total was at 6.5. This year at the beginning of the year it came out as 7.5 yet they traded away Ricky Ray. How could this be? This was a trap. If you do some further analysis, Edmonton ended up winning 7 games so it truly did prove to be a trap. Now at the end of the season, in a playoff match, it just so happens that Ricky Ray goes against his former team. Obviously from the beginning oddsmakers (aka Randall) had no confidence that they would go over 7.5. Yes, this was just the regular season and it has nothing to do with the playoffs but you know Edmonton was not going to win this game putting them over the 7.5 total. Then the line comes out as +3.5. Another trap. There was never a doubt that Toronto would win this thing.
Now this is how it's done folks. You can question my thinking all you want but if you did and went against me you would be poor now while I just used house money and took Randall for a ride.
you
0
Quote Originally Posted by RedFlagCapper:
It's quite simple. Here's the reasoning. Last year Edmonton's season win total was at 6.5. This year at the beginning of the year it came out as 7.5 yet they traded away Ricky Ray. How could this be? This was a trap. If you do some further analysis, Edmonton ended up winning 7 games so it truly did prove to be a trap. Now at the end of the season, in a playoff match, it just so happens that Ricky Ray goes against his former team. Obviously from the beginning oddsmakers (aka Randall) had no confidence that they would go over 7.5. Yes, this was just the regular season and it has nothing to do with the playoffs but you know Edmonton was not going to win this game putting them over the 7.5 total. Then the line comes out as +3.5. Another trap. There was never a doubt that Toronto would win this thing.
Now this is how it's done folks. You can question my thinking all you want but if you did and went against me you would be poor now while I just used house money and took Randall for a ride.
Ugh, I seriously had to read this like 3 times to make sense of it. Are you saying that a Edmonton win yesterday would have put them over the 7.5 season win total? I don't think that's true.
Don't worry about it. I have my madness.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JooseBoxx:
Ugh, I seriously had to read this like 3 times to make sense of it. Are you saying that a Edmonton win yesterday would have put them over the 7.5 season win total? I don't think that's true.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
you 
Hot Forum Topics
