What a week in football! This week has the CFL putting 4 games on the board....Calgary once again shows their regular season dominance, if they don't do it in the Grey Cup playoffs this year we'll have to consider them to be chokers. In the past September games the OVERs have dominated, and pretty much every other month are UNDER months.
Indigo lines
Bombers -7 Alouettes 54
Redblacks -3 Eskimos 54
Argonauts +3' Roughriders 51
Lions -3 Tiger Cats 51
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Season to date 32-23.
What a week in football! This week has the CFL putting 4 games on the board....Calgary once again shows their regular season dominance, if they don't do it in the Grey Cup playoffs this year we'll have to consider them to be chokers. In the past September games the OVERs have dominated, and pretty much every other month are UNDER months.
The general conversation in this forum has definitely depleted over the past few seasons and I know you try your best attempts to get it re-vamped so will chime in when I can to add some more to the conversations in this forum.
We are now at the most important end of the season, last few weeks. East being East as usual, West wide open.
Pipkin showed his vulnerability the other day vs he Lions and Jennings although turned the ball over a bit, looked decent behind a good O line.
Haven't looked at the schedule yet but do the Stamps have a week off?
Feel as though the Eskimos might get a road win against the Redblacks this week. Ottawa looked ok vs the Riders but geez, Collaros was poor. Reilly is a completely different QB and the Redblacks won't get Reilly throwing for less than 50% completion rate.
0
GL this weekend Indigo
The general conversation in this forum has definitely depleted over the past few seasons and I know you try your best attempts to get it re-vamped so will chime in when I can to add some more to the conversations in this forum.
We are now at the most important end of the season, last few weeks. East being East as usual, West wide open.
Pipkin showed his vulnerability the other day vs he Lions and Jennings although turned the ball over a bit, looked decent behind a good O line.
Haven't looked at the schedule yet but do the Stamps have a week off?
Feel as though the Eskimos might get a road win against the Redblacks this week. Ottawa looked ok vs the Riders but geez, Collaros was poor. Reilly is a completely different QB and the Redblacks won't get Reilly throwing for less than 50% completion rate.
Hi Aussie,....the Alouettes will have to make a decision in the off-season about their quarterbacks, which one to keep and which one to release...I wouldn't be surprised to see Saskatchewan get whoever the Alouettes release. Manziel has one of the highest salaries in the league and they paid a couple of number 1s for him, so he'll either be playing or looking for another team next season.
I didn't get to watch the Sasquatch/Redblacks as I was in a seminar in Melbourne, but watching the Alouette game was an experience, that was approximately 3 hours in my life that I'll never get back.
I am posting a game 3 NFL query that has hit around 68% since 1989.
AD and game number=3 and t:wins<2 and t:wins-o:wins<=0 and n:F
Play ON an away dog in game number 3 with either 0 or 1 wins, also with less wins than their game 3 opponent, who will be favored in their 4th game.
Indicated teams.....Raiders, Saints, Cowboys (if Seattle wins on MNF), Chargers
0
Hi Aussie,....the Alouettes will have to make a decision in the off-season about their quarterbacks, which one to keep and which one to release...I wouldn't be surprised to see Saskatchewan get whoever the Alouettes release. Manziel has one of the highest salaries in the league and they paid a couple of number 1s for him, so he'll either be playing or looking for another team next season.
I didn't get to watch the Sasquatch/Redblacks as I was in a seminar in Melbourne, but watching the Alouette game was an experience, that was approximately 3 hours in my life that I'll never get back.
I am posting a game 3 NFL query that has hit around 68% since 1989.
AD and game number=3 and t:wins<2 and t:wins-o:wins<=0 and n:F
Play ON an away dog in game number 3 with either 0 or 1 wins, also with less wins than their game 3 opponent, who will be favored in their 4th game.
Indicated teams.....Raiders, Saints, Cowboys (if Seattle wins on MNF), Chargers
Not exactly burning it up with my picks....the past two seasons my NCAA football picks have hit around 57% on over 200 plays, but it is looking like I don't know what I'm doing this year so far.....maybe I don't.
0
Posted plays this football season...
CFL 33-23
NCAA 8-13 ATS
NFL 8-6
Not exactly burning it up with my picks....the past two seasons my NCAA football picks have hit around 57% on over 200 plays, but it is looking like I don't know what I'm doing this year so far.....maybe I don't.
Wow, senility might be creeping in (is it Mister Bookie or is it me?) as there are three sides that are very much off.
Bombers having lost a few in a row a double digit favorite?
Lions have only had one small blip in their schedule at home and the Redblacks getting three at home? Granted, they play nowhere near as good at home as away, but they are a better team than the Eskimos, that is a 6 point difference, the highest recorded difference in Indigo's history. I'll have to contemplate what it all means.
0
Bookie lines are out.
Mine in parentheses....
Bombers -10 (-7) Alouettes 52 (54)
Redblacks +3 (-3) Eskimos 54 (54)
Argonauts +3 (+3') Roughriders 51 (51)
Lions +2' (-3) Tiger Cats 50' (51)
Wow, senility might be creeping in (is it Mister Bookie or is it me?) as there are three sides that are very much off.
Bombers having lost a few in a row a double digit favorite?
Lions have only had one small blip in their schedule at home and the Redblacks getting three at home? Granted, they play nowhere near as good at home as away, but they are a better team than the Eskimos, that is a 6 point difference, the highest recorded difference in Indigo's history. I'll have to contemplate what it all means.
Well, most of the awesome underdog queries dry up in September for whatever reason....I've got one that has performed well in the past, but the sample size is VERY small.
Teams off at least a 3 game losing streak playing as a home non-divisional favorite (Blue Bombers) have been 14-4 ATS (+11.00), 14-4 straight up (+15.39) and 10-7-1 OVER (0.86).
This has been 6-1 ATS in September with the home team winning by an average of 23 points, average score 37.1-14.1
0
Well, most of the awesome underdog queries dry up in September for whatever reason....I've got one that has performed well in the past, but the sample size is VERY small.
Teams off at least a 3 game losing streak playing as a home non-divisional favorite (Blue Bombers) have been 14-4 ATS (+11.00), 14-4 straight up (+15.39) and 10-7-1 OVER (0.86).
This has been 6-1 ATS in September with the home team winning by an average of 23 points, average score 37.1-14.1
Matt Nichols is more than likely playing for his job.....if the Bombers lose this game he more than likely will be benched and will be released in the off-season.
0
Matt Nichols is more than likely playing for his job.....if the Bombers lose this game he more than likely will be benched and will be released in the off-season.
And Johnny will be playing for his job the rest of the season as well. Normally in this situation I would be playing the underdog, but home favorites on a losing streak tend to play well and cover.
Manziel impressed when he played last time putting the ball on the money on numerous deep balls, only to have his receivers butter-finger the ball away. He will be taking his shots down the field, that is for sure and that is what we want to see.
I am going to suppose that both teams are going to score at least 20 points, and games in that situation go OVER about 75% of the time.
Let the air bill filled with footballs Friday night
Play:
1) Alouettes/Bombers OVER 52'
0
And Johnny will be playing for his job the rest of the season as well. Normally in this situation I would be playing the underdog, but home favorites on a losing streak tend to play well and cover.
Manziel impressed when he played last time putting the ball on the money on numerous deep balls, only to have his receivers butter-finger the ball away. He will be taking his shots down the field, that is for sure and that is what we want to see.
I am going to suppose that both teams are going to score at least 20 points, and games in that situation go OVER about 75% of the time.
Let the air bill filled with footballs Friday night
The Greek (only sportsbook to have a posted line) has the Lions as a home dog to the Cats....if Lulay is playing it will hard to resist taking the Lions as a home dog.....I'd assume based on how well the Lions have played at home this year, that if Lulay gets the start they may be home favorites.
If Jennings is playing it is a definite no-play for me.
0
The Greek (only sportsbook to have a posted line) has the Lions as a home dog to the Cats....if Lulay is playing it will hard to resist taking the Lions as a home dog.....I'd assume based on how well the Lions have played at home this year, that if Lulay gets the start they may be home favorites.
If Jennings is playing it is a definite no-play for me.
Makes sense now, the line in the Lions' game,....I would put the difference between Lulay and Jennings at 8 points/game.
Here are my NFL picks for the week....last week was about what I'd expect....this week should be the best of the whole season.
1) Raiders +3
2) Broncos +5
3) Saints +3
4) Texans -6
5) Chargers +7
6) Jaguars -??? I'd take the Jags up to -10, neither quarterback for Tennessee can play average football and quarterbacks are what win for you on the road........the Jags are going to have the best regular season in the league this year, now that Bortles has developed into at least an average quarterback. Jags and the Vikings should be the favorites in the two conferences....if the Vikings can figure out how to convert their kicks. NFC North by far the best division in football, they are going to beat up their opponents in out of division games.
0
Makes sense now, the line in the Lions' game,....I would put the difference between Lulay and Jennings at 8 points/game.
Here are my NFL picks for the week....last week was about what I'd expect....this week should be the best of the whole season.
1) Raiders +3
2) Broncos +5
3) Saints +3
4) Texans -6
5) Chargers +7
6) Jaguars -??? I'd take the Jags up to -10, neither quarterback for Tennessee can play average football and quarterbacks are what win for you on the road........the Jags are going to have the best regular season in the league this year, now that Bortles has developed into at least an average quarterback. Jags and the Vikings should be the favorites in the two conferences....if the Vikings can figure out how to convert their kicks. NFC North by far the best division in football, they are going to beat up their opponents in out of division games.
Manziel and the Alouettes go down....I got a little too cute instead of following what the data said....the CFL is looking less and less interesting every week I watch them. Sherman is looking like a loser as a coach, and the Alouettes will have to find some receivers for next year, as they can't hold onto the ball.
In the NFL, deleting Broncos, adding Packers, here's what I have for Sunday....
1) Raiders +3, +114
2) Panthers -3, +104
3) Texans -6
4) Packers -2'
5) Saints +3
6) Chargers +7
Waiting on a line for the Jaguars, if it stays under -10 I will take them also.
If the Steelers were to become pik or an underdog I'd take them also.
0
Manziel and the Alouettes go down....I got a little too cute instead of following what the data said....the CFL is looking less and less interesting every week I watch them. Sherman is looking like a loser as a coach, and the Alouettes will have to find some receivers for next year, as they can't hold onto the ball.
In the NFL, deleting Broncos, adding Packers, here's what I have for Sunday....
1) Raiders +3, +114
2) Panthers -3, +104
3) Texans -6
4) Packers -2'
5) Saints +3
6) Chargers +7
Waiting on a line for the Jaguars, if it stays under -10 I will take them also.
If the Steelers were to become pik or an underdog I'd take them also.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
