oops, posted in wrong forum:
Anita Marks, Joe Fortenbaugh and Tyler Fulghum, Doug Kezirian, I mean betting against them must be very profitable. Anybody reverse tail or know that record?
Thanks.
oops, posted in wrong forum:
Anita Marks, Joe Fortenbaugh and Tyler Fulghum, Doug Kezirian, I mean betting against them must be very profitable. Anybody reverse tail or know that record?
Thanks.
oops, posted in wrong forum:
Anita Marks, Joe Fortenbaugh and Tyler Fulghum, Doug Kezirian, I mean betting against them must be very profitable. Anybody reverse tail or know that record?
Thanks.
isnt it a bit concerning:
ESPN owns a book
ESPN gives out picks?
That used to be called a "Conflict of Interest" back in the day-
NOw its not even questioned.
and the NFL wants to buy ESPN.
PS> All those you mention are easy fades
Don't Fade Erin Dolan/ She has good consultants
isnt it a bit concerning:
ESPN owns a book
ESPN gives out picks?
That used to be called a "Conflict of Interest" back in the day-
NOw its not even questioned.
and the NFL wants to buy ESPN.
PS> All those you mention are easy fades
Don't Fade Erin Dolan/ She has good consultants
@TJZags598
I agree. These guys are a joke now, picking all of these "Kyle Juszczyk over 8.5 yards" wagers as their Best Bets (!!!) that no one ever makes. I am sure they don't make them themselves. The vig on this crap would kill them. Which is what ESPN Bets (Penn Gaming) wants.
Joe Fort actually bet the Niners and had to suck it up on the show this evening and his radio show this afternoon. At least Anita said he was an absolute moron going against Mahomes who was 10-1 as a dog...
But, that is not my question. My question at the top was, why not bet against them every day?
@TJZags598
I agree. These guys are a joke now, picking all of these "Kyle Juszczyk over 8.5 yards" wagers as their Best Bets (!!!) that no one ever makes. I am sure they don't make them themselves. The vig on this crap would kill them. Which is what ESPN Bets (Penn Gaming) wants.
Joe Fort actually bet the Niners and had to suck it up on the show this evening and his radio show this afternoon. At least Anita said he was an absolute moron going against Mahomes who was 10-1 as a dog...
But, that is not my question. My question at the top was, why not bet against them every day?
@smellybunty
It's a licensing deal - Penn will pay ESPN $1.5 billion in cash over the next ten years, as well as $500 million in warrants to buy shares in return for a revenue split.
@smellybunty
It's a licensing deal - Penn will pay ESPN $1.5 billion in cash over the next ten years, as well as $500 million in warrants to buy shares in return for a revenue split.
@Espn80000
Exactly
Some people do.
You are 100% right, they steer people to these hard to hit player props with huge juice.
ESPN has producers that steer them in the direction...Thats where real money is being made by books...
Joe F has ALWAYS been AWFUL. They even openly call him a mush on air.
@Espn80000
Exactly
Some people do.
You are 100% right, they steer people to these hard to hit player props with huge juice.
ESPN has producers that steer them in the direction...Thats where real money is being made by books...
Joe F has ALWAYS been AWFUL. They even openly call him a mush on air.
@TJZags598
Fox does the same thing 24/7 and they are in the bookie business. I trust them because they are rightoues apple christians and espn is the devil. Kid Rock may be down with the Devil but I am not! They cant fool me.
@TJZags598
Fox does the same thing 24/7 and they are in the bookie business. I trust them because they are rightoues apple christians and espn is the devil. Kid Rock may be down with the Devil but I am not! They cant fool me.
Problem with ESPN is their management thinks they should " Entertain "
the viewers. They do not realize yet that viewers are tuning in not to
be entertained , but to get credible capping information so they can
make sound wagering decisions. Hopefully they will realize that soon.
They will not change however , until another network puts solid , no
nonsense programming on the air that will show ESPN the type of
information that Sports bettors are looking for. They need solid
competition for the Sports wagering viewer before they will wise up
and stop with the Clown show they are currently broadcasting.
Problem with ESPN is their management thinks they should " Entertain "
the viewers. They do not realize yet that viewers are tuning in not to
be entertained , but to get credible capping information so they can
make sound wagering decisions. Hopefully they will realize that soon.
They will not change however , until another network puts solid , no
nonsense programming on the air that will show ESPN the type of
information that Sports bettors are looking for. They need solid
competition for the Sports wagering viewer before they will wise up
and stop with the Clown show they are currently broadcasting.
@WISEGUY36
Clown show is right. They could probably buy VSIN for a couple million. Problem is, they would get pushback for actually trying to beat the books, instead of the clown show feeding the books' high vig, asinine bets.
When they keep extending contracts with screamers like, well you know, they are not really in the real sports business anymore.
@WISEGUY36
Clown show is right. They could probably buy VSIN for a couple million. Problem is, they would get pushback for actually trying to beat the books, instead of the clown show feeding the books' high vig, asinine bets.
When they keep extending contracts with screamers like, well you know, they are not really in the real sports business anymore.
VSIN is a step up for sure. FTM ( Follow the Money ) has some very credible
guests on the show talking about the sport they specialize in wagering on.
They also don't mind sharing info and offer up some solid wagers as well.
And I hope ESPN doesn't buy them because they'll screw VSIN up as well.
VSIN is a step up for sure. FTM ( Follow the Money ) has some very credible
guests on the show talking about the sport they specialize in wagering on.
They also don't mind sharing info and offer up some solid wagers as well.
And I hope ESPN doesn't buy them because they'll screw VSIN up as well.
I remember the " Old Days ' when touts like Jim Fiest and Wayne Root
were on the air with sports betting shows in the early '90's.
Sports betting wasn't a big business back then but they had a following.
They gave out horrible picks, but at least you didn't have to pay for them.
I remember the " Old Days ' when touts like Jim Fiest and Wayne Root
were on the air with sports betting shows in the early '90's.
Sports betting wasn't a big business back then but they had a following.
They gave out horrible picks, but at least you didn't have to pay for them.
hahaha true!
Amazing to me that these talking heads are on national television…. Two blondes, and two twerps.
Can’t make this up. Whoever said the sexy blond Dolan has a winning record is fake news. Bear Steve etc..amateurs.
hahaha true!
Amazing to me that these talking heads are on national television…. Two blondes, and two twerps.
Can’t make this up. Whoever said the sexy blond Dolan has a winning record is fake news. Bear Steve etc..amateurs.
x2
x2
That's why ESPN stopped posting their Betting Record on the program.
It was an total embarrassment to ESPN. Guess they couldn't fire them
because they were under contract , but they could stop showing the
how terrible their track record was so the public wouldn't tune them out.
That's why ESPN stopped posting their Betting Record on the program.
It was an total embarrassment to ESPN. Guess they couldn't fire them
because they were under contract , but they could stop showing the
how terrible their track record was so the public wouldn't tune them out.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.