March.. How are your lines so sharp? A bad day that could've been worse, but also could've been better.
Drake -2 (-110) - L
Michigan St. -2 (-110) - L
NC St +1 (-110) - W
Boise St. pk (-110) - W
Posted Record: 21-13 (61.8%)
Drake won by 1 and missed the front end of a 1-and-1. Wichita St. still had a chance for a shot after the FT so you never know what could've happened if Yesufu hit the FTs. Michigan St. controlled the whole game until the last 4 mins and lost the game when they fouled late for an UCLA and-1. Boise St. held the lead for 3 quarters of the game but only won by a mere point. Every team that was up, by over double digits, lost their lead and fought till the wire. The only safe play yesterday was NC St. CLVs are also hard to play. There's a reason they call this MADNESS.. Was gonna post earlier but I'm always late per usual, only had VT early though and took Arkansas live ML for + odds. Let's get on a roll today
"The lines chico.. they never lie"
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
3/19/21
March.. How are your lines so sharp? A bad day that could've been worse, but also could've been better.
Drake -2 (-110) - L
Michigan St. -2 (-110) - L
NC St +1 (-110) - W
Boise St. pk (-110) - W
Posted Record: 21-13 (61.8%)
Drake won by 1 and missed the front end of a 1-and-1. Wichita St. still had a chance for a shot after the FT so you never know what could've happened if Yesufu hit the FTs. Michigan St. controlled the whole game until the last 4 mins and lost the game when they fouled late for an UCLA and-1. Boise St. held the lead for 3 quarters of the game but only won by a mere point. Every team that was up, by over double digits, lost their lead and fought till the wire. The only safe play yesterday was NC St. CLVs are also hard to play. There's a reason they call this MADNESS.. Was gonna post earlier but I'm always late per usual, only had VT early though and took Arkansas live ML for + odds. Let's get on a roll today
Texas Tech -3.5 (-110) - Line has moved to a closer game. Mac McClung is a March player. Chris Beard has trusted him with the game time and time again this year and I'll trust him in this game too
Oral Roberts +15 (-110) - Seeing all the games yesterday and the early ones today, it seems like the only lines that can even be considered as "safe" pre-game may be the larger lines. Teams are here to compete and underdogs get a lot of love with fans. ORU has the offense to be able to cover
Oregon St. +8.5 (-110) - Coming off a conf. tourney championship and being 8.5 point dogs? I like it. Tennessee is athletic but the Beavers can cover
North Carolina -1.5 (-110) - Wisconsin has one of the toughest/scrappy backcourt in the nation (Trice, Davidson) to pair with some of the softest big man(Reuvers, Potter, Wahl). UNC should dominate interior scoring and neutralize Wisconsin's bigs from making a huge impact on the game. Wisco will need 3 point contributions to win
Purdue -7 (-110) - Purdue landed a #4 seed, and I hope people aren't sleeping on them anymore. In a year, this team will be even better and come back to the dance a higher seed. Purdue can score on all levels, driving, shooting, but most importantly, feeding the post. North Texas will not be stopping Trevion, and much less 7'4 phenom, freshmen Zach Edey
Rutgers -2 (-110) - Clemson was a team that started out the season great and peaked early. Rutgers hasn't been in the dance for 30 years, and Geo Baker and the Scarlet Knights have a pretty complete team minus a sharpshooter
Syracuse +3 (-110) - The Mountain West has lower level comp as SD St. had only one Quadrant 1 win. Syracuse has played against potential Sweet 16 teams with their zone
Staying away from Georgia Tech, losing the conf. POY who avgs 20 points will be a tough hit to recover from. I still love the grittiness of Georgia Tech, they will need outstanding performances from their guard to advance. Two late games, might play one, both, or none Hope everyone has a winning day!
As always, BOL to all!
"The lines chico.. they never lie"
0
Texas Tech -3.5 (-110) - Line has moved to a closer game. Mac McClung is a March player. Chris Beard has trusted him with the game time and time again this year and I'll trust him in this game too
Oral Roberts +15 (-110) - Seeing all the games yesterday and the early ones today, it seems like the only lines that can even be considered as "safe" pre-game may be the larger lines. Teams are here to compete and underdogs get a lot of love with fans. ORU has the offense to be able to cover
Oregon St. +8.5 (-110) - Coming off a conf. tourney championship and being 8.5 point dogs? I like it. Tennessee is athletic but the Beavers can cover
North Carolina -1.5 (-110) - Wisconsin has one of the toughest/scrappy backcourt in the nation (Trice, Davidson) to pair with some of the softest big man(Reuvers, Potter, Wahl). UNC should dominate interior scoring and neutralize Wisconsin's bigs from making a huge impact on the game. Wisco will need 3 point contributions to win
Purdue -7 (-110) - Purdue landed a #4 seed, and I hope people aren't sleeping on them anymore. In a year, this team will be even better and come back to the dance a higher seed. Purdue can score on all levels, driving, shooting, but most importantly, feeding the post. North Texas will not be stopping Trevion, and much less 7'4 phenom, freshmen Zach Edey
Rutgers -2 (-110) - Clemson was a team that started out the season great and peaked early. Rutgers hasn't been in the dance for 30 years, and Geo Baker and the Scarlet Knights have a pretty complete team minus a sharpshooter
Syracuse +3 (-110) - The Mountain West has lower level comp as SD St. had only one Quadrant 1 win. Syracuse has played against potential Sweet 16 teams with their zone
Staying away from Georgia Tech, losing the conf. POY who avgs 20 points will be a tough hit to recover from. I still love the grittiness of Georgia Tech, they will need outstanding performances from their guard to advance. Two late games, might play one, both, or none Hope everyone has a winning day!
Oklahoma St. -7 (-110) - Forgot about one of my favorite players in CBB, Mr. Cade Cunningham. Liberty is good, will need my man to come up big in 2nd half as he has all year
@D-Town Appreciate your luck and support D-Town, BOL!
@LVTruck Appreciate yours as well LVTruck, FH unders seem like fair plays in these first two roundsBOL!
Oklahoma St. -7 (-110) - Forgot about one of my favorite players in CBB, Mr. Cade Cunningham. Liberty is good, will need my man to come up big in 2nd half as he has all year
@D-Town Appreciate your luck and support D-Town, BOL!
@LVTruck Appreciate yours as well LVTruck, FH unders seem like fair plays in these first two roundsBOL!
Winthrop +6.5 (-110) - Don't know if they win outright but should be a game at the wire. Nova lost their PG and Justin Moore might be out again too
Buffalo +2 (-110) - Watched this team all year, they have 4 double digit scorers. Thought they were actually a top 2 team in their conference, second to Ohio, who they lost to in the conf. tourney
Ole Miss -3.5 (-110) - Would be competitive enough in the Big Dance but unfortunately for them, they're in the NIT. Have the best player on the floor in Shuler and played against much better competition throughout the year
"The lines chico.. they never lie"
0
Huge upset by Oral Roberts! Oregon St. also continued to play well. Need the ball to keep rolling..
Winthrop +6.5 (-110) - Don't know if they win outright but should be a game at the wire. Nova lost their PG and Justin Moore might be out again too
Buffalo +2 (-110) - Watched this team all year, they have 4 double digit scorers. Thought they were actually a top 2 team in their conference, second to Ohio, who they lost to in the conf. tourney
Ole Miss -3.5 (-110) - Would be competitive enough in the Big Dance but unfortunately for them, they're in the NIT. Have the best player on the floor in Shuler and played against much better competition throughout the year
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.