How is there no coaches challenge on a foul call for college teams with a questionable foul call in last couple minutes of a game?! With millions on the line wagered .. not sure how the referee is not under more scrutiny. They will review .2 seconds for 20 minutes .. but won’t review a foul call that ends the game. Don’t mind me I’m just bitter about foul call on Arizona that cost them the game.
3
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
How is there no coaches challenge on a foul call for college teams with a questionable foul call in last couple minutes of a game?! With millions on the line wagered .. not sure how the referee is not under more scrutiny. They will review .2 seconds for 20 minutes .. but won’t review a foul call that ends the game. Don’t mind me I’m just bitter about foul call on Arizona that cost them the game.
One of worst calls I"ve ever seen in 50 years of watching college basketball......cbb needs to do like the NBA and have a coaches challenge for a foul...at least in final two minutes......something......you can't have a team lose a game on that bad of a call.....thank goodness it wasn't a tourney game.....just brutally bad
0
One of worst calls I"ve ever seen in 50 years of watching college basketball......cbb needs to do like the NBA and have a coaches challenge for a foul...at least in final two minutes......something......you can't have a team lose a game on that bad of a call.....thank goodness it wasn't a tourney game.....just brutally bad
Bc they'd go to the monitor and still get it wrong while now waiting 20mins to do so reviewing it. Just like a few situations last few weeks where a team ( Iona ) clearly shot the ball after time expired and counted it anyway, also where a team ( Indiana ) makes a shot before the buzzer but they waive it off. The craziest apart about is that they called it right on the floor and then changed it when went to review
1
Bc they'd go to the monitor and still get it wrong while now waiting 20mins to do so reviewing it. Just like a few situations last few weeks where a team ( Iona ) clearly shot the ball after time expired and counted it anyway, also where a team ( Indiana ) makes a shot before the buzzer but they waive it off. The craziest apart about is that they called it right on the floor and then changed it when went to review
The new york times did an article a few years back, on who coaches liked and disliked:
Tony Padilla
“Never been a fan. I can’t stand, at a high level, the phantom calls. The calls I don’t agree with are one thing. It’s the out-of-nowhere calls. And this dude has never been wrong about anything, ever.”
“Never feel great when he’s on a game. Never know how the game will be called.”
At least he is consistent.
0
@JohnnyZ1976
This sums it up:
The new york times did an article a few years back, on who coaches liked and disliked:
Tony Padilla
“Never been a fan. I can’t stand, at a high level, the phantom calls. The calls I don’t agree with are one thing. It’s the out-of-nowhere calls. And this dude has never been wrong about anything, ever.”
“Never feel great when he’s on a game. Never know how the game will be called.”
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.