I had no stake in this game and didn't bet on it, but if I did I would have hammered OU ML. -350 against the #11 ranked team. Of course they're gonna win. But the way they're winning this game is highly suspicious.
Iowa State can't grab a defensive rebound and the ESPN commentators haven't mentioned it even once. It's as if the commentators, refs, and Iowa St players were just putting on an act the whole game knowing the script said that OU would come back and win but not cover. How do you not mention the rebounding that let OU win the game? It's just really suspicious that they'd never mention it at all.
And then every time Iowa State took a 4-6 point lead they conveniently threw the ball into the stands or made some kind of stupid behind the back pass. I honestly think Iowa St took money to set up #1 Kansas vs. #2 Oklahoma so ESPN can get more money and TV ratings.
On paper, OU should have won by 20+ and could have just jacked up 3's the whole game, gotten offensive rebounds, and dominated if this is the real case. Such a broadway show.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I had no stake in this game and didn't bet on it, but if I did I would have hammered OU ML. -350 against the #11 ranked team. Of course they're gonna win. But the way they're winning this game is highly suspicious.
Iowa State can't grab a defensive rebound and the ESPN commentators haven't mentioned it even once. It's as if the commentators, refs, and Iowa St players were just putting on an act the whole game knowing the script said that OU would come back and win but not cover. How do you not mention the rebounding that let OU win the game? It's just really suspicious that they'd never mention it at all.
And then every time Iowa State took a 4-6 point lead they conveniently threw the ball into the stands or made some kind of stupid behind the back pass. I honestly think Iowa St took money to set up #1 Kansas vs. #2 Oklahoma so ESPN can get more money and TV ratings.
On paper, OU should have won by 20+ and could have just jacked up 3's the whole game, gotten offensive rebounds, and dominated if this is the real case. Such a broadway show.
That is why whenever I played the ML in basketball, both college and pro, I never played any price -130 or more. Basketball just has too many variables. Like a few days ago, Lakers +975 and Celtics -1750 and Lakers won straight up. Who would've thought that?
0
That is why whenever I played the ML in basketball, both college and pro, I never played any price -130 or more. Basketball just has too many variables. Like a few days ago, Lakers +975 and Celtics -1750 and Lakers won straight up. Who would've thought that?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.