ok since you asked brother I will post those for you as well! I just try to pick the games I believe Vegas made in the middle of the night 1/2 asleep:)
OK ATS
Central Michigan give me the 14.5
Central Michigan and George Mason both played Marquette in Marquette
Central Michigan lost by 8 as a 26.5 point dog and Mason lost by 19 as a 14 point dog
Possible consideration for the pen! At +625 but definitely take the 14.5
Presbyterian +3.5
I don’t know exactly what is wrong with Wofford but they lost both SU and ATS
against Lipscomb in their 1st game if you followed my Puppy peeing all over the
furniture in Lipscomb last night obviously Belmont you would see they are overvalued at home! Now Wofford goes to Presbyterian who just lost by 8 to NC St as a 21.5
point dog!! Another consideration for the pen! But take the points!
Troy +12.5
I really don’t get this number it could go either way but Troy I believe is more than 7
points better than Lipscomb and Arky only beat Lipscomb who I will play against
Saturday again:)
Farleigh Dickinson +28
Nebraska isn’t covering these big numbers favored by 24 against Rio Grand won
by 20; Bethune Cookman by 23.5 won by 5!! Don’t trust Farleigh but think they are
better then those 2
California +7.5
Be the toughest challenge to date for Vandy who only beat Southeast Missouri by 9
last out
Houston Christian +35.5
My logic here is Creighton isn’t even in the discussion with Texas and Texas beat HCU by
31! So I am thinking this number is about 10 points too fat
Texas Arlington +16.5
I am able to forgive the 1st game for Arlington! I believe they are better than
Chattanooga
0
ok since you asked brother I will post those for you as well! I just try to pick the games I believe Vegas made in the middle of the night 1/2 asleep:)
OK ATS
Central Michigan give me the 14.5
Central Michigan and George Mason both played Marquette in Marquette
Central Michigan lost by 8 as a 26.5 point dog and Mason lost by 19 as a 14 point dog
Possible consideration for the pen! At +625 but definitely take the 14.5
Presbyterian +3.5
I don’t know exactly what is wrong with Wofford but they lost both SU and ATS
against Lipscomb in their 1st game if you followed my Puppy peeing all over the
furniture in Lipscomb last night obviously Belmont you would see they are overvalued at home! Now Wofford goes to Presbyterian who just lost by 8 to NC St as a 21.5
point dog!! Another consideration for the pen! But take the points!
Troy +12.5
I really don’t get this number it could go either way but Troy I believe is more than 7
points better than Lipscomb and Arky only beat Lipscomb who I will play against
Saturday again:)
Farleigh Dickinson +28
Nebraska isn’t covering these big numbers favored by 24 against Rio Grand won
by 20; Bethune Cookman by 23.5 won by 5!! Don’t trust Farleigh but think they are
better then those 2
California +7.5
Be the toughest challenge to date for Vandy who only beat Southeast Missouri by 9
last out
Houston Christian +35.5
My logic here is Creighton isn’t even in the discussion with Texas and Texas beat HCU by
31! So I am thinking this number is about 10 points too fat
Texas Arlington +16.5
I am able to forgive the 1st game for Arlington! I believe they are better than
Ok get this your boy lost his 2 dogs he put in the kennel for adoption!! But called Central Michigan a 14.5 SU winner as well as a Presbyterian +3.5 SU winner
0
Ok get this your boy lost his 2 dogs he put in the kennel for adoption!! But called Central Michigan a 14.5 SU winner as well as a Presbyterian +3.5 SU winner
When you say SU winner to me that means “straight up” as you bet the moneyline but you never listed that out. You said “possibly straight up.” In future posts, could you list each pick and whether we should actually take them ML please? You were doing that in your NCAAB posts earlier this year.
0
@AceGambler332
When you say SU winner to me that means “straight up” as you bet the moneyline but you never listed that out. You said “possibly straight up.” In future posts, could you list each pick and whether we should actually take them ML please? You were doing that in your NCAAB posts earlier this year.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.