As far as I know he is not playing today. Rutgers is my best play of the day. Vegas always give out lines that might be freebees well today I think this is one of them. The public first reaction is to throw money on Wisconsin of course 4th rank team in the nation vs a bad Rutgers team. If you watch college basketball in the past few year you would know Rutgers always show up in game where people least expect them to, specially within there own conference.
This something anyone can do them selves, look up how many points Frank have scored in the past 8 games. Subtract his point scored from the final score of the game (Wisconsin team points).
The Final score of each game subtracting Frank points scored from the final score right side:
There record would be 3 - 5 and on top of that if the spread was +17 1/2 for each team that they played in their last 8 games they would be 2 - 6 ATS with Frank Kaminsky out of the lineup, give me Rutgers !!!! I have them at +17 1/2 even if they were + 15 I would still take Rutgers large.
0
As far as I know he is not playing today. Rutgers is my best play of the day. Vegas always give out lines that might be freebees well today I think this is one of them. The public first reaction is to throw money on Wisconsin of course 4th rank team in the nation vs a bad Rutgers team. If you watch college basketball in the past few year you would know Rutgers always show up in game where people least expect them to, specially within there own conference.
This something anyone can do them selves, look up how many points Frank have scored in the past 8 games. Subtract his point scored from the final score of the game (Wisconsin team points).
The Final score of each game subtracting Frank points scored from the final score right side:
There record would be 3 - 5 and on top of that if the spread was +17 1/2 for each team that they played in their last 8 games they would be 2 - 6 ATS with Frank Kaminsky out of the lineup, give me Rutgers !!!! I have them at +17 1/2 even if they were + 15 I would still take Rutgers large.
As far as I know he is not playing today. Rutgers is my best play of the day. Vegas always give out lines that might be freebees well today I think this is one of them. The public first reaction is to throw money on Wisconsin of course 4th rank team in the nation vs a bad Rutgers team. If you watch college basketball in the past few year you would know Rutgers always show up in game where people least expect them to, specially within there own conference.
This something anyone can do them selves, look up how many points Frank have scored in the past 8 games. Subtract his point scored from the final score of the game (Wisconsin team points).
The Final score of each game subtracting Frank points scored from the final score right side:
There record would be 3 - 5 and on top of that if the spread was +17 1/2 for each team that they played in their last 8 games they would be 2 - 6 ATS with Frank Kaminsky out of the lineup, give me Rutgers !!!! I have them at +17 1/2 even if they were + 15 I would still take Rutgers large.
this has to be the dumbest thing i've read on this site. what kind of analysis is that? are you assuming wisconsin is going to shoot 0% on every possession that kaminsky isn't part of? what kind of reasoning is this? i'm sorry but put some thought into what you write before telling people who they should bet on
0
Quote Originally Posted by Olivpinc:
As far as I know he is not playing today. Rutgers is my best play of the day. Vegas always give out lines that might be freebees well today I think this is one of them. The public first reaction is to throw money on Wisconsin of course 4th rank team in the nation vs a bad Rutgers team. If you watch college basketball in the past few year you would know Rutgers always show up in game where people least expect them to, specially within there own conference.
This something anyone can do them selves, look up how many points Frank have scored in the past 8 games. Subtract his point scored from the final score of the game (Wisconsin team points).
The Final score of each game subtracting Frank points scored from the final score right side:
There record would be 3 - 5 and on top of that if the spread was +17 1/2 for each team that they played in their last 8 games they would be 2 - 6 ATS with Frank Kaminsky out of the lineup, give me Rutgers !!!! I have them at +17 1/2 even if they were + 15 I would still take Rutgers large.
this has to be the dumbest thing i've read on this site. what kind of analysis is that? are you assuming wisconsin is going to shoot 0% on every possession that kaminsky isn't part of? what kind of reasoning is this? i'm sorry but put some thought into what you write before telling people who they should bet on
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.