• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 5
      NFL Week 5
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | College Basketball

    Jeff's CBB for Friday

    jeffscottsports
    clem1
    bullmoose
    p-lane1
    MaineRoad
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 1644
    Posts: 17
     
    jeffscottsports
    jeffscottsports
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 215
    Posted: Feb. 10, 2012 - 10:52 AM ET #1

    Just a Horrible week(2-4 last night-9.2 units). But we press on and try and fight through this. The way I have played this week i understand if you have faded me, but hopefully your still with me.



    TOP PLAYS

    4 UNIT PLAY

    POWER ANGLE PLAY

    Loyola- Maryland/ Iona Under 142.5: Yes I know the pace in which the Gaels play at but the majority of their high scoring games are vs teams with poor defenses and at home. Last time on the road the Gaels played Manhattan and there were 158 points scored, but in looking at their previous 3 road contests there was and average of 121.3 ppg scored. Those three teams (St. Peter's, Siena and Fairfield) were all respectable on defense, allowing 68 ppg or less. Now they get to face a Greyhound team that is 73rd in points allowed at 62.8 ppg, while they have also allowed just 58.9 ppg in conference play and just 53.2 ppg during their 6 games win streak. Iona has scored 77.8 ppg on the road, but none of those teams played have been locked in defensively as this Greyhound squad is right now. Because of their pace Iona has allowed 72.2 ppg overall and 68.8 ppg on the road, but they have played better in the MAAC, where they have allowed just 65.4 ppg overall and 65.2 ppg in their last 5. Loyola has averaged 68.8 ppg in MAAC play and 69.3 ppg at home, but they have not hit more than 70 points in each of their last 8 games. I don't think they will here either as they will not look to run with the Gaels here as they will try and frustrate them with a slower pace and great defense. I don't expect the Greyhounds to keep them below 60 points like each of their last 6 opponents, but just like Loyola, I do not expect the Gaels to hit 70+ points here. POWER ANGLE FOR THIS PLAY--- Play Under in all games where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points if a team (LOYOLA-MD) is off 4 straight wins by 10 points or more vs an opponent that played 2 straight games with a combined score of 155 points or more. This play is 36-11 since 1997.




    3 UNIT PLAY

    Dartmouth/ Princeton Over 118.5: The Princeton Tigers have played higher scoring games than normal for them this year as their games have averaged  126.8 ppg overall, while their conference games have averaged 129.4 ppg. One reason for the higher scoring games is their defense, which has struggled in the Ivy league, allowing 65.6 ppg. Dartmouth has not scored well in the Ivy league, where they have averaged just 52.8 ppg and that is mainly due to their two games vs Harvard, in which they averaged just 42.5 ppg, but in their last 4 Ivy games their average has gone up to 58 ppg. Gotta believe they should be able to hit at least that number vs this less than stellar Princeton defense. The Tiger on offense are not spectacular as they have averaged 63.3 ppg overall and 63.8 ppg in Ivy play and they will be taking on a Dartmouth team that has allowed 62.8 ppg in the league. I believe that Princeton should be able to hit at least 62 in this one. Neither team is a scoring machine, but there are enough deficiencies at the defensive end for this game to comfortable hit 120+. 




    OTHER PLAYS

    2 UNIT PLAY

    Brown +10.5 over COLUMBIA: Brown is not playing well as they have lost each of their last 3 games by 11 points or more, but each one of Columbia's 6 Ivy games have been decided by 5 points or less. I feel Brown can keep it close here. 





    1 UNIT PLAY

    WRIGHT STATE -3 over Wisc-Green Bay: Play on a favorite that is a bad offensive team (<=63 PPG) after a combined score of 125 points or less 3 straight games vs a good defensive team (63-67 PPG). This play is 34-13 the last 5 seasons. 

    BEST OF LUCK EVERYONE

    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.

    Just a Horrible week(2-4 last night-9.2 units). But we press on and try and fight through this. The way I have played this week i understand if you have faded me, but hopefully your still with me.



    TOP PLAYS

    4 UNIT PLAY

    POWER ANGLE PLAY

    Loyola- Maryland/ Iona Under 142.5: Yes I know the pace in which the Gaels play at but the majority of their high scoring games are vs teams with poor defenses and at home. Last time on the road the Gaels played Manhattan and there were 158 points scored, but in looking at their previous 3 road contests there was and average of 121.3 ppg scored. Those three teams (St. Peter's, Siena and Fairfield) were all respectable on defense, allowing 68 ppg or less. Now they get to face a Greyhound team that is 73rd in points allowed at 62.8 ppg, while they have also allowed just 58.9 ppg in conference play and just 53.2 ppg during their 6 games win streak. Iona has scored 77.8 ppg on the road, but none of those teams played have been locked in defensively as this Greyhound squad is right now. Because of their pace Iona has allowed 72.2 ppg overall and 68.8 ppg on the road, but they have played better in the MAAC, where they have allowed just 65.4 ppg overall and 65.2 ppg in their last 5. Loyola has averaged 68.8 ppg in MAAC play and 69.3 ppg at home, but they have not hit more than 70 points in each of their last 8 games. I don't think they will here either as they will not look to run with the Gaels here as they will try and frustrate them with a slower pace and great defense. I don't expect the Greyhounds to keep them below 60 points like each of their last 6 opponents, but just like Loyola, I do not expect the Gaels to hit 70+ points here. POWER ANGLE FOR THIS PLAY--- Play Under in all games where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points if a team (LOYOLA-MD) is off 4 straight wins by 10 points or more vs an opponent that played 2 straight games with a combined score of 155 points or more. This play is 36-11 since 1997.




    3 UNIT PLAY

    Dartmouth/ Princeton Over 118.5: The Princeton Tigers have played higher scoring games than normal for them this year as their games have averaged  126.8 ppg overall, while their conference games have averaged 129.4 ppg. One reason for the higher scoring games is their defense, which has struggled in the Ivy league, allowing 65.6 ppg. Dartmouth has not scored well in the Ivy league, where they have averaged just 52.8 ppg and that is mainly due to their two games vs Harvard, in which they averaged just 42.5 ppg, but in their last 4 Ivy games their average has gone up to 58 ppg. Gotta believe they should be able to hit at least that number vs this less than stellar Princeton defense. The Tiger on offense are not spectacular as they have averaged 63.3 ppg overall and 63.8 ppg in Ivy play and they will be taking on a Dartmouth team that has allowed 62.8 ppg in the league. I believe that Princeton should be able to hit at least 62 in this one. Neither team is a scoring machine, but there are enough deficiencies at the defensive end for this game to comfortable hit 120+. 




    OTHER PLAYS

    2 UNIT PLAY

    Brown +10.5 over COLUMBIA: Brown is not playing well as they have lost each of their last 3 games by 11 points or more, but each one of Columbia's 6 Ivy games have been decided by 5 points or less. I feel Brown can keep it close here. 





    1 UNIT PLAY

    WRIGHT STATE -3 over Wisc-Green Bay: Play on a favorite that is a bad offensive team (<=63 PPG) after a combined score of 125 points or less 3 straight games vs a good defensive team (63-67 PPG). This play is 34-13 the last 5 seasons. 

    BEST OF LUCK EVERYONE

     
    jeffscottsports
    jeffscottsports
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 215
    Posted: Feb. 10, 2012 - 10:53 AM ET #2

    CBB Records

    Top Plays Overall 229-196-8  ( +45.2 Units)...   5 Unit Plays  28-21-1  (+24.5 Units)  4 Unit Plays  48-48-1  (-19.2 Units)... 3 Unit Plays 153-127-6 (+39.9 Units)

    Top Play Totals  99-82-0  (+19.4 Units)...  Top Plays Teasers   51-41-1  (+17.4 Units)...  Power Angle Plays   19-20-0  (-4.6 Units)

    Other Plays  149-116-5  (+55.1 Units)...  Google Plays (28-23-2)


     

    NBA Records

    Top Plays Overall   62-55-2  (+1.2 Units)...  4 Unit Plays 3-6-0  (-14.4 Units)...  3 Unit Plays  59-47-2  (+13.1 Units)

    Top Play Totals   35-18-1  (+47.2 Units)...  Top Play Teasers  11-20-1 (-33.0 Units)... Power Angle Plays  5-2-0  (+9.4 Units) 

    Other Plays  37-45-0  (-16.0 Units)...  Google Plays (4-3) 



    Hockey Records

    Top Plays Overall  27-22-4  (+1.48 Units)...   4 Unit Plays  4-5-1 (-6.36 Units)... 3 Unit Plays  23-17-3 (+7.84 Units)

    Other Plays   29-23-0  (+1.50 Units)

    Reply

    CBB Records

    Top Plays Overall 229-196-8  ( +45.2 Units)...   5 Unit Plays  28-21-1  (+24.5 Units)  4 Unit Plays  48-48-1  (-19.2 Units)... 3 Unit Plays 153-127-6 (+39.9 Units)

    Top Play Totals  99-82-0  (+19.4 Units)...  Top Plays Teasers   51-41-1  (+17.4 Units)...  Power Angle Plays   19-20-0  (-4.6 Units)

    Other Plays  149-116-5  (+55.1 Units)...  Google Plays (28-23-2)


     

    NBA Records

    Top Plays Overall   62-55-2  (+1.2 Units)...  4 Unit Plays 3-6-0  (-14.4 Units)...  3 Unit Plays  59-47-2  (+13.1 Units)

    Top Play Totals   35-18-1  (+47.2 Units)...  Top Play Teasers  11-20-1 (-33.0 Units)... Power Angle Plays  5-2-0  (+9.4 Units) 

    Other Plays  37-45-0  (-16.0 Units)...  Google Plays (4-3) 



    Hockey Records

    Top Plays Overall  27-22-4  (+1.48 Units)...   4 Unit Plays  4-5-1 (-6.36 Units)... 3 Unit Plays  23-17-3 (+7.84 Units)

    Other Plays   29-23-0  (+1.50 Units)

     
    clem1
    clem1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2011
    Posts: 380
    Posted: Feb. 10, 2012 - 10:58 AM ET #3

    Quote Originally Posted by jeffscottsports:

    Just a Horrible week(2-4 last night-9.2 units). But we press on and try and fight through this. The way I have played this week i understand if you have faded me, but hopefully your still with me.



    TOP PLAYS

    4 UNIT PLAY

    POWER ANGLE PLAY

    Loyola- Maryland/ Iona Under 142.5: Yes I know the pace in which the Gaels play at but the majority of their high scoring games are vs teams with poor defenses and at home. Last time on the road the Gaels played Manhattan and there were 158 points scored, but in looking at their previous 3 road contests there was and average of 121.3 ppg scored. Those three teams (St. Peter's, Siena and Fairfield) were all respectable on defense, allowing 68 ppg or less. Now they get to face a Greyhound team that is 73rd in points allowed at 62.8 ppg, while they have also allowed just 58.9 ppg in conference play and just 53.2 ppg during their 6 games win streak. Iona has scored 77.8 ppg on the road, but none of those teams played have been locked in defensively as this Greyhound squad is right now. Because of their pace Iona has allowed 72.2 ppg overall and 68.8 ppg on the road, but they have played better in the MAAC, where they have allowed just 65.4 ppg overall and 65.2 ppg in their last 5. Loyola has averaged 68.8 ppg in MAAC play and 69.3 ppg at home, but they have not hit more than 70 points in each of their last 8 games. I don't think they will here either as they will not look to run with the Gaels here as they will try and frustrate them with a slower pace and great defense. I don't expect the Greyhounds to keep them below 60 points like each of their last 6 opponents, but just like Loyola, I do not expect the Gaels to hit 70+ points here. POWER ANGLE FOR THIS PLAY--- Play Under in all games where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points if a team (LOYOLA-MD) is off 4 straight wins by 10 points or more vs an opponent that played 2 straight games with a combined score of 155 points or more. This play is 36-11 since 1997.




    3 UNIT PLAY

    Dartmouth/ Princeton Over 118.5: The Princeton Tigers have played higher scoring games than normal for them this year as their games have averaged  126.8 ppg overall, while their conference games have averaged 129.4 ppg. One reason for the higher scoring games is their defense, which has struggled in the Ivy league, allowing 65.6 ppg. Dartmouth has not scored well in the Ivy league, where they have averaged just 52.8 ppg and that is mainly due to their two games vs Harvard, in which they averaged just 42.5 ppg, but in their last 4 Ivy games their average has gone up to 58 ppg. Gotta believe they should be able to hit at least that number vs this less than stellar Princeton defense. The Tiger on offense are not spectacular as they have averaged 63.3 ppg overall and 63.8 ppg in Ivy play and they will be taking on a Dartmouth team that has allowed 62.8 ppg in the league. I believe that Princeton should be able to hit at least 62 in this one. Neither team is a scoring machine, but there are enough deficiencies at the defensive end for this game to comfortable hit 120+. 




    OTHER PLAYS

    2 UNIT PLAY

    Brown +10.5 over COLUMBIA: Brown is not playing well as they have lost each of their last 3 games by 11 points or more, but each one of Columbia's 6 Ivy games have been decided by 5 points or less. I feel Brown can keep it close here. 





    1 UNIT PLAY

    WRIGHT STATE -3 over Wisc-Green Bay: Play on a favorite that is a bad offensive team (<=63 PPG) after a combined score of 125 points or less 3 straight games vs a good defensive team (63-67 PPG). This play is 34-13 the last 5 seasons. 

    BEST OF LUCK EVERYONE

    2-4 i got you 1-5 ( did i err? )
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by jeffscottsports:

    Just a Horrible week(2-4 last night-9.2 units). But we press on and try and fight through this. The way I have played this week i understand if you have faded me, but hopefully your still with me.



    TOP PLAYS

    4 UNIT PLAY

    POWER ANGLE PLAY

    Loyola- Maryland/ Iona Under 142.5: Yes I know the pace in which the Gaels play at but the majority of their high scoring games are vs teams with poor defenses and at home. Last time on the road the Gaels played Manhattan and there were 158 points scored, but in looking at their previous 3 road contests there was and average of 121.3 ppg scored. Those three teams (St. Peter's, Siena and Fairfield) were all respectable on defense, allowing 68 ppg or less. Now they get to face a Greyhound team that is 73rd in points allowed at 62.8 ppg, while they have also allowed just 58.9 ppg in conference play and just 53.2 ppg during their 6 games win streak. Iona has scored 77.8 ppg on the road, but none of those teams played have been locked in defensively as this Greyhound squad is right now. Because of their pace Iona has allowed 72.2 ppg overall and 68.8 ppg on the road, but they have played better in the MAAC, where they have allowed just 65.4 ppg overall and 65.2 ppg in their last 5. Loyola has averaged 68.8 ppg in MAAC play and 69.3 ppg at home, but they have not hit more than 70 points in each of their last 8 games. I don't think they will here either as they will not look to run with the Gaels here as they will try and frustrate them with a slower pace and great defense. I don't expect the Greyhounds to keep them below 60 points like each of their last 6 opponents, but just like Loyola, I do not expect the Gaels to hit 70+ points here. POWER ANGLE FOR THIS PLAY--- Play Under in all games where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points if a team (LOYOLA-MD) is off 4 straight wins by 10 points or more vs an opponent that played 2 straight games with a combined score of 155 points or more. This play is 36-11 since 1997.




    3 UNIT PLAY

    Dartmouth/ Princeton Over 118.5: The Princeton Tigers have played higher scoring games than normal for them this year as their games have averaged  126.8 ppg overall, while their conference games have averaged 129.4 ppg. One reason for the higher scoring games is their defense, which has struggled in the Ivy league, allowing 65.6 ppg. Dartmouth has not scored well in the Ivy league, where they have averaged just 52.8 ppg and that is mainly due to their two games vs Harvard, in which they averaged just 42.5 ppg, but in their last 4 Ivy games their average has gone up to 58 ppg. Gotta believe they should be able to hit at least that number vs this less than stellar Princeton defense. The Tiger on offense are not spectacular as they have averaged 63.3 ppg overall and 63.8 ppg in Ivy play and they will be taking on a Dartmouth team that has allowed 62.8 ppg in the league. I believe that Princeton should be able to hit at least 62 in this one. Neither team is a scoring machine, but there are enough deficiencies at the defensive end for this game to comfortable hit 120+. 




    OTHER PLAYS

    2 UNIT PLAY

    Brown +10.5 over COLUMBIA: Brown is not playing well as they have lost each of their last 3 games by 11 points or more, but each one of Columbia's 6 Ivy games have been decided by 5 points or less. I feel Brown can keep it close here. 





    1 UNIT PLAY

    WRIGHT STATE -3 over Wisc-Green Bay: Play on a favorite that is a bad offensive team (<=63 PPG) after a combined score of 125 points or less 3 straight games vs a good defensive team (63-67 PPG). This play is 34-13 the last 5 seasons. 

    BEST OF LUCK EVERYONE

    2-4 i got you 1-5 ( did i err? )
     
    jeffscottsports
    jeffscottsports
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 215
    Posted: Feb. 10, 2012 - 11:10 AM ET #4

    Quote Originally Posted by clem1:

    2-4 i got you 1-5 ( did i err? )
    I looked back at my plays...I won with western Kentucky+15 and hit the under northwestern game by .5...the rest i lost..
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by clem1:

    2-4 i got you 1-5 ( did i err? )
    I looked back at my plays...I won with western Kentucky+15 and hit the under northwestern game by .5...the rest i lost..
     
    jeffscottsports
    jeffscottsports
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 215
    Posted: Feb. 10, 2012 - 11:13 AM ET #5

    Quote Originally Posted by clem1:

    2-4 i got you 1-5 ( did i err? )
    Units were wrong thou I lost 10.4 last night
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by clem1:

    2-4 i got you 1-5 ( did i err? )
    Units were wrong thou I lost 10.4 last night
     
    clem1
    clem1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2011
    Posts: 380
    Posted: Feb. 10, 2012 - 11:14 AM ET #6

    Quote Originally Posted by jeffscottsports:

    I looked back at my plays...I won with western Kentucky+15 and hit the under northwestern game by .5...the rest i lost..
    i stand corrected - gl today bro
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by jeffscottsports:

    I looked back at my plays...I won with western Kentucky+15 and hit the under northwestern game by .5...the rest i lost..
    i stand corrected - gl today bro
     
    bullmoose
    bullmoose
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 2326
    Posted: Feb. 10, 2012 - 11:53 AM ET #7

    like your iona total play gl
    Reply
    like your iona total play gl
     
    p-lane1
    p-lane1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2010
    Posts: 265
    Posted: Feb. 10, 2012 - 12:05 PM ET #8

    Quote Originally Posted by jeffscottsports:

    Just a Horrible week(2-4 last night-9.2 units). But we press on and try and fight through this. The way I have played this week i understand if you have faded me, but hopefully your still with me.



    TOP PLAYS

    4 UNIT PLAY

    POWER ANGLE PLAY

    Loyola- Maryland/ Iona Under 142.5: Yes I know the pace in which the Gaels play at but the majority of their high scoring games are vs teams with poor defenses and at home. Last time on the road the Gaels played Manhattan and there were 158 points scored, but in looking at their previous 3 road contests there was and average of 121.3 ppg scored. Those three teams (St. Peter's, Siena and Fairfield) were all respectable on defense, allowing 68 ppg or less. Now they get to face a Greyhound team that is 73rd in points allowed at 62.8 ppg, while they have also allowed just 58.9 ppg in conference play and just 53.2 ppg during their 6 games win streak. Iona has scored 77.8 ppg on the road, but none of those teams played have been locked in defensively as this Greyhound squad is right now. Because of their pace Iona has allowed 72.2 ppg overall and 68.8 ppg on the road, but they have played better in the MAAC, where they have allowed just 65.4 ppg overall and 65.2 ppg in their last 5. Loyola has averaged 68.8 ppg in MAAC play and 69.3 ppg at home, but they have not hit more than 70 points in each of their last 8 games. I don't think they will here either as they will not look to run with the Gaels here as they will try and frustrate them with a slower pace and great defense. I don't expect the Greyhounds to keep them below 60 points like each of their last 6 opponents, but just like Loyola, I do not expect the Gaels to hit 70+ points here. POWER ANGLE FOR THIS PLAY--- Play Under in all games where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points if a team (LOYOLA-MD) is off 4 straight wins by 10 points or more vs an opponent that played 2 straight games with a combined score of 155 points or more. This play is 36-11 since 1997.




    3 UNIT PLAY

    Dartmouth/ Princeton Over 118.5: The Princeton Tigers have played higher scoring games than normal for them this year as their games have averaged  126.8 ppg overall, while their conference games have averaged 129.4 ppg. One reason for the higher scoring games is their defense, which has struggled in the Ivy league, allowing 65.6 ppg. Dartmouth has not scored well in the Ivy league, where they have averaged just 52.8 ppg and that is mainly due to their two games vs Harvard, in which they averaged just 42.5 ppg, but in their last 4 Ivy games their average has gone up to 58 ppg. Gotta believe they should be able to hit at least that number vs this less than stellar Princeton defense. The Tiger on offense are not spectacular as they have averaged 63.3 ppg overall and 63.8 ppg in Ivy play and they will be taking on a Dartmouth team that has allowed 62.8 ppg in the league. I believe that Princeton should be able to hit at least 62 in this one. Neither team is a scoring machine, but there are enough deficiencies at the defensive end for this game to comfortable hit 120+. 




    OTHER PLAYS

    2 UNIT PLAY

    Brown +10.5 over COLUMBIA: Brown is not playing well as they have lost each of their last 3 games by 11 points or more, but each one of Columbia's 6 Ivy games have been decided by 5 points or less. I feel Brown can keep it close here. 





    1 UNIT PLAY

    WRIGHT STATE -3 over Wisc-Green Bay: Play on a favorite that is a bad offensive team (<=63 PPG) after a combined score of 125 points or less 3 straight games vs a good defensive team (63-67 PPG). This play is 34-13 the last 5 seasons. 

    BEST OF LUCK EVERYONE

    actually u lost -10.40 last nite. if your going to keep records, be accurate. Your quickly becoming fade material and i say that in the most respected of ways. Your write-ups contain nothing longtime exper players like myself look for. Those items= posessions/or pace, offensive/defensive efficiency, styles, types of defensive pressure teams bring/forced to's, and on and on. NOT trends and stats mostly involving the past. Again, your going about this the wrong way, and constructive direction is my goal here. Numbers mean nothing if WE don't apply them properly...
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by jeffscottsports:

    Just a Horrible week(2-4 last night-9.2 units). But we press on and try and fight through this. The way I have played this week i understand if you have faded me, but hopefully your still with me.



    TOP PLAYS

    4 UNIT PLAY

    POWER ANGLE PLAY

    Loyola- Maryland/ Iona Under 142.5: Yes I know the pace in which the Gaels play at but the majority of their high scoring games are vs teams with poor defenses and at home. Last time on the road the Gaels played Manhattan and there were 158 points scored, but in looking at their previous 3 road contests there was and average of 121.3 ppg scored. Those three teams (St. Peter's, Siena and Fairfield) were all respectable on defense, allowing 68 ppg or less. Now they get to face a Greyhound team that is 73rd in points allowed at 62.8 ppg, while they have also allowed just 58.9 ppg in conference play and just 53.2 ppg during their 6 games win streak. Iona has scored 77.8 ppg on the road, but none of those teams played have been locked in defensively as this Greyhound squad is right now. Because of their pace Iona has allowed 72.2 ppg overall and 68.8 ppg on the road, but they have played better in the MAAC, where they have allowed just 65.4 ppg overall and 65.2 ppg in their last 5. Loyola has averaged 68.8 ppg in MAAC play and 69.3 ppg at home, but they have not hit more than 70 points in each of their last 8 games. I don't think they will here either as they will not look to run with the Gaels here as they will try and frustrate them with a slower pace and great defense. I don't expect the Greyhounds to keep them below 60 points like each of their last 6 opponents, but just like Loyola, I do not expect the Gaels to hit 70+ points here. POWER ANGLE FOR THIS PLAY--- Play Under in all games where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points if a team (LOYOLA-MD) is off 4 straight wins by 10 points or more vs an opponent that played 2 straight games with a combined score of 155 points or more. This play is 36-11 since 1997.




    3 UNIT PLAY

    Dartmouth/ Princeton Over 118.5: The Princeton Tigers have played higher scoring games than normal for them this year as their games have averaged  126.8 ppg overall, while their conference games have averaged 129.4 ppg. One reason for the higher scoring games is their defense, which has struggled in the Ivy league, allowing 65.6 ppg. Dartmouth has not scored well in the Ivy league, where they have averaged just 52.8 ppg and that is mainly due to their two games vs Harvard, in which they averaged just 42.5 ppg, but in their last 4 Ivy games their average has gone up to 58 ppg. Gotta believe they should be able to hit at least that number vs this less than stellar Princeton defense. The Tiger on offense are not spectacular as they have averaged 63.3 ppg overall and 63.8 ppg in Ivy play and they will be taking on a Dartmouth team that has allowed 62.8 ppg in the league. I believe that Princeton should be able to hit at least 62 in this one. Neither team is a scoring machine, but there are enough deficiencies at the defensive end for this game to comfortable hit 120+. 




    OTHER PLAYS

    2 UNIT PLAY

    Brown +10.5 over COLUMBIA: Brown is not playing well as they have lost each of their last 3 games by 11 points or more, but each one of Columbia's 6 Ivy games have been decided by 5 points or less. I feel Brown can keep it close here. 





    1 UNIT PLAY

    WRIGHT STATE -3 over Wisc-Green Bay: Play on a favorite that is a bad offensive team (<=63 PPG) after a combined score of 125 points or less 3 straight games vs a good defensive team (63-67 PPG). This play is 34-13 the last 5 seasons. 

    BEST OF LUCK EVERYONE

    actually u lost -10.40 last nite. if your going to keep records, be accurate. Your quickly becoming fade material and i say that in the most respected of ways. Your write-ups contain nothing longtime exper players like myself look for. Those items= posessions/or pace, offensive/defensive efficiency, styles, types of defensive pressure teams bring/forced to's, and on and on. NOT trends and stats mostly involving the past. Again, your going about this the wrong way, and constructive direction is my goal here. Numbers mean nothing if WE don't apply them properly...
     
    MaineRoad
    MaineRoad
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2005
    Posts: 12254
    Posted: Feb. 10, 2012 - 12:09 PM ET #9

    Boy, Dartmouth overs are tough.  They could easilly toss up a 46 tonight, which would leave a lot of work for the Tigers.
    Reply
    Boy, Dartmouth overs are tough.  They could easilly toss up a 46 tonight, which would leave a lot of work for the Tigers.
     
    jeffscottsports
    jeffscottsports
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 215
    Posted: Feb. 10, 2012 - 1:56 PM ET #10

    Quote Originally Posted by p-lane1:

    actually u lost -10.40 last nite. if your going to keep records, be accurate. Your quickly becoming fade material and i say that in the most respected of ways. Your write-ups contain nothing longtime exper players like myself look for. Those items= posessions/or pace, offensive/defensive efficiency, styles, types of defensive pressure teams bring/forced to's, and on and on. NOT trends and stats mostly involving the past. Again, your going about this the wrong way, and constructive direction is my goal here. Numbers mean nothing if WE don't apply them properly...
    Where were you when I was kicking ass last week, and next time you want to point  out that I made a mistake with my units, you better LOOK and notice I already corrected myself and lost 10.4...and about those items you are talking about in my write ups, they are beneficial MORON!!! Come back next time when I am doing well, not just when I am having a rough week, fucking haters.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by p-lane1:

    actually u lost -10.40 last nite. if your going to keep records, be accurate. Your quickly becoming fade material and i say that in the most respected of ways. Your write-ups contain nothing longtime exper players like myself look for. Those items= posessions/or pace, offensive/defensive efficiency, styles, types of defensive pressure teams bring/forced to's, and on and on. NOT trends and stats mostly involving the past. Again, your going about this the wrong way, and constructive direction is my goal here. Numbers mean nothing if WE don't apply them properly...
    Where were you when I was kicking ass last week, and next time you want to point  out that I made a mistake with my units, you better LOOK and notice I already corrected myself and lost 10.4...and about those items you are talking about in my write ups, they are beneficial MORON!!! Come back next time when I am doing well, not just when I am having a rough week, fucking haters.
     
    jeffscottsports
    jeffscottsports
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 215
    Posted: Feb. 10, 2012 - 1:58 PM ET #11

    Quote Originally Posted by p-lane1:

    actually u lost -10.40 last nite. if your going to keep records, be accurate. Your quickly becoming fade material and i say that in the most respected of ways. Your write-ups contain nothing longtime exper players like myself look for. Those items= posessions/or pace, offensive/defensive efficiency, styles, types of defensive pressure teams bring/forced to's, and on and on. NOT trends and stats mostly involving the past. Again, your going about this the wrong way, and constructive direction is my goal here. Numbers mean nothing if WE don't apply them properly...
    EXP...PLAYER  give me a fucking break son
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by p-lane1:

    actually u lost -10.40 last nite. if your going to keep records, be accurate. Your quickly becoming fade material and i say that in the most respected of ways. Your write-ups contain nothing longtime exper players like myself look for. Those items= posessions/or pace, offensive/defensive efficiency, styles, types of defensive pressure teams bring/forced to's, and on and on. NOT trends and stats mostly involving the past. Again, your going about this the wrong way, and constructive direction is my goal here. Numbers mean nothing if WE don't apply them properly...
    EXP...PLAYER  give me a fucking break son
     
    p-lane1
    p-lane1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2010
    Posts: 265
    Posted: Feb. 10, 2012 - 4:02 PM ET #12

    Quote Originally Posted by jeffscottsports:

    EXP...PLAYER  give me a fucking break son
       OK, save all that emotion for your relationship & seperate it from capping sports.Your welcome there..  Because if that's all it takes to chap your ass uhave no chance in this bizz. I wasn't pilling on, don't care if your winning or losing, it's the style that warranted the comment. your emotional responses  tell us everything we need to know. Simply put, mature up, cuz right now your a bad pony..Emotion will get u broke in this bizz,or put u in the ground.  yw welcome
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by jeffscottsports:

    EXP...PLAYER  give me a fucking break son
       OK, save all that emotion for your relationship & seperate it from capping sports.Your welcome there..  Because if that's all it takes to chap your ass uhave no chance in this bizz. I wasn't pilling on, don't care if your winning or losing, it's the style that warranted the comment. your emotional responses  tell us everything we need to know. Simply put, mature up, cuz right now your a bad pony..Emotion will get u broke in this bizz,or put u in the ground.  yw welcome
     
    jeffscottsports
    jeffscottsports
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 215
    Posted: Feb. 10, 2012 - 6:34 PM ET #13

    Quote Originally Posted by p-lane1:

       OK, save all that emotion for your relationship & seperate it from capping sports.Your welcome there..  Because if that's all it takes to chap your ass uhave no chance in this bizz. I wasn't pilling on, don't care if your winning or losing, it's the style that warranted the comment. your emotional responses  tell us everything we need to know. Simply put, mature up, cuz right now your a bad pony..Emotion will get u broke in this bizz,or put u in the ground.  yw welcome
    bro...you have no idea, it's sad that people like you that are insecure have to make themselves feel better at my expense because my week has not gone the way I wanted to come on and tell me how to write up a game, who the fuck are you!!! Like I said where were you the weeks I have been here, because this is my worst week by far since joining Covers. Only when us cappers have a string of bad days then all the losers come out and think they know it all, but in your case it's all about being insecure, because you can't stand the pressure picking games your self, that's what pisses me off, and please fade me,and stay off my threads, wantabee.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by p-lane1:

       OK, save all that emotion for your relationship & seperate it from capping sports.Your welcome there..  Because if that's all it takes to chap your ass uhave no chance in this bizz. I wasn't pilling on, don't care if your winning or losing, it's the style that warranted the comment. your emotional responses  tell us everything we need to know. Simply put, mature up, cuz right now your a bad pony..Emotion will get u broke in this bizz,or put u in the ground.  yw welcome
    bro...you have no idea, it's sad that people like you that are insecure have to make themselves feel better at my expense because my week has not gone the way I wanted to come on and tell me how to write up a game, who the fuck are you!!! Like I said where were you the weeks I have been here, because this is my worst week by far since joining Covers. Only when us cappers have a string of bad days then all the losers come out and think they know it all, but in your case it's all about being insecure, because you can't stand the pressure picking games your self, that's what pisses me off, and please fade me,and stay off my threads, wantabee.
     
    jeffscottsports
    jeffscottsports
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 215
    Posted: Feb. 10, 2012 - 7:39 PM ET #14

    Quote Originally Posted by p-lane1:

    actually u lost -10.40 last nite. if your going to keep records, be accurate. Your quickly becoming fade material and i say that in the most respected of ways. Your write-ups contain nothing longtime exper players like myself look for. Those items= posessions/or pace, offensive/defensive efficiency, styles, types of defensive pressure teams bring/forced to's, and on and on. NOT trends and stats mostly involving the past. Again, your going about this the wrong way, and constructive direction is my goal here. Numbers mean nothing if WE don't apply them properly...
    Another thing I want to bring up is the only people that can come on my threads and rip me a new one is the people I have let down this week, because I am responsible that they have lost there hard earned money, not dirtbags like you....you feel me now lets move on
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by p-lane1:

    actually u lost -10.40 last nite. if your going to keep records, be accurate. Your quickly becoming fade material and i say that in the most respected of ways. Your write-ups contain nothing longtime exper players like myself look for. Those items= posessions/or pace, offensive/defensive efficiency, styles, types of defensive pressure teams bring/forced to's, and on and on. NOT trends and stats mostly involving the past. Again, your going about this the wrong way, and constructive direction is my goal here. Numbers mean nothing if WE don't apply them properly...
    Another thing I want to bring up is the only people that can come on my threads and rip me a new one is the people I have let down this week, because I am responsible that they have lost there hard earned money, not dirtbags like you....you feel me now lets move on
     
    kdog175
    kdog175
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2011
    Posts: 7
    Posted: Feb. 10, 2012 - 7:56 PM ET #15

    I don't post much as you can see but I keep up with the better cappers here and all of the better cappers have been in the dumps this week or so. But in all sports teams go thru slumps and work out of them. You just keep grinding ahead and what is funny to me is people are not doing this crap to lose money. Keep up the good work Jeff
    Reply
    I don't post much as you can see but I keep up with the better cappers here and all of the better cappers have been in the dumps this week or so. But in all sports teams go thru slumps and work out of them. You just keep grinding ahead and what is funny to me is people are not doing this crap to lose money. Keep up the good work Jeff
     
    clem1
    clem1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2011
    Posts: 380
    Posted: Feb. 10, 2012 - 8:05 PM ET #16

    Quote Originally Posted by jeffscottsports:

    Another thing I want to bring up is the only people that can come on my threads and rip me a new one is the people I have let down this week, because I am responsible that they have lost there hard earned money, not dirtbags like you....you feel me now lets move on
    jeff calm down - you don't see any top cappers here knocking you because they know it takes balls to lay your pics out there, especially with analysis - let your record speak for itself -  i feel your sincere - but i warned you - this is a much more knowledgeable site than pregame - they don't know you here - your a firm believer in not paying "so called pros" like myself - there are cappers here that will kill the paid pros at pregame - continue what your doing and gl - clem1
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by jeffscottsports:

    Another thing I want to bring up is the only people that can come on my threads and rip me a new one is the people I have let down this week, because I am responsible that they have lost there hard earned money, not dirtbags like you....you feel me now lets move on
    jeff calm down - you don't see any top cappers here knocking you because they know it takes balls to lay your pics out there, especially with analysis - let your record speak for itself -  i feel your sincere - but i warned you - this is a much more knowledgeable site than pregame - they don't know you here - your a firm believer in not paying "so called pros" like myself - there are cappers here that will kill the paid pros at pregame - continue what your doing and gl - clem1
     
     
    MaineRoad
    MaineRoad
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2005
    Posts: 12254
    Posted: Feb. 11, 2012 - 1:36 PM ET #17

    Quote Originally Posted by MaineRoad:

    Boy, Dartmouth overs are tough.  They could easilly toss up a 46 tonight, which would leave a lot of work for the Tigers.

     

    or a 47. 

    GL, today. 

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by MaineRoad:

    Boy, Dartmouth overs are tough.  They could easilly toss up a 46 tonight, which would leave a lot of work for the Tigers.

     

    or a 47. 

    GL, today. 

    All Forums | College Basketball

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 460,358
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 269,946
    • Thursday 10/08/2026 438
    • PART DEUX 166
    • Week 6 Money 8,880
    • TB/BOYS live in game comment welcome 853
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 60,854
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 36,388
    • 🏀😎🥳 NCAA hoops bets hitting over 63% each year for past few seasons!...BUT will this continue? 🤔 ...or regress?? 🤒🤕😧 191,793
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 105,270

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.