I've observed something concerning with one of the pickers on a college basketball website, and it's raised some serious questions about fairness. From what I can tell, his picks consistently seem to land on the most favorable numbers, to a degree that feels almost impossible without some sort of inside knowledge or access. For instance, today he selected Virginia under 134, yet that line had already moved to 129 by the time he made his pick public. It seems very unlikely that he could have genuinely secured that earlier number of 134, given how much movement had occurred.
This isn’t the first time this has happened, either. His record consistently reflects access to the absolute best numbers, in a way that seems highly unusual compared to the rest of us. From my understanding, he may have connections that give him insider access, possibly even to the website’s servers or data. He has a history as a capper that wasn’t particularly successful before, and his sudden shift to hitting nearly perfect numbers on every pick is difficult to believe without some kind of external help.
I'm not trying to accuse anyone unfairly—I just want to see a level playing field. It’s important that everyone participating in these picks is held to the same standards, without any special access or influence.
Hot Forum Topics
