First off, I wanted to apologize for repeatedly venting on my thread about my picks. Part of that is my trusting other people and sources more than myself and getting mad at them and myself when it doesn't work. Part of that is my anxious personality. Hopefully I can dig up enough information to help some people out there cash.
Michigan +2
These two teams play each other close because they are evenly-matched. That means wait for the highest line you can get and grab it, because, in expectation of a tight game, that's where the value is. I still think that Michigan has a slight match-up edge that allows them to have a chance to win. The key is the perimeter. Michigan relies on the three-ball more than any other team in the conference. They're second in three-point % while Wisconsin is 4th in opposing three-point % and 13th in opposing three-point %. For instance, Michigan lost at Wisconsin only by 4, shooting 10/21 from three. I think this game means a lot because that was on January 17 when many teams (Illinois, Michigan State...) were still struggling super hard on the road. In a slew of pretty bad road losses-- at Iowa, by 16 in Illinois on January 11, by 8 at Sparty, by 4 at OSU, they could keep it close at Wisconsin, having at one point a 38-30 lead with 12 minutes left in the second half, mostly because teams succeed in draining threes against Wisconsin. While these are two of the slowest offensive teams, Michigan can use its long possession time effectively by draining threes. They are also decently physical in the interior. They contained Nigel Hayes both times they played, Hayes had just a 94 offensive rating at home vs Mich, scoring 13 points, and and a 77 offensive rating on the road with just 6 points. I don't think this is going to be a game where he can make a significant contribution like he did against Northwestern. Michigan's defense, overall, isn't that bad. They're ranked 152nd in efficiency on the season, but in the top 100 in the last three. And Wisconsin's offense, obviously, isn't that potent. Wisconsin's offense has lately been relying more than usual on the three-ball, including attempting 29 threes against Northwestern. They will surely have to change that against Michigan, against whom Minnesota put up only 13 threes, Illinois 15 and Purdue 19 including in overtime. I think Michigan has the tools on offense, and can do enough on defense, to keep this game within a bucket, if not achieve the outright win.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
First off, I wanted to apologize for repeatedly venting on my thread about my picks. Part of that is my trusting other people and sources more than myself and getting mad at them and myself when it doesn't work. Part of that is my anxious personality. Hopefully I can dig up enough information to help some people out there cash.
Michigan +2
These two teams play each other close because they are evenly-matched. That means wait for the highest line you can get and grab it, because, in expectation of a tight game, that's where the value is. I still think that Michigan has a slight match-up edge that allows them to have a chance to win. The key is the perimeter. Michigan relies on the three-ball more than any other team in the conference. They're second in three-point % while Wisconsin is 4th in opposing three-point % and 13th in opposing three-point %. For instance, Michigan lost at Wisconsin only by 4, shooting 10/21 from three. I think this game means a lot because that was on January 17 when many teams (Illinois, Michigan State...) were still struggling super hard on the road. In a slew of pretty bad road losses-- at Iowa, by 16 in Illinois on January 11, by 8 at Sparty, by 4 at OSU, they could keep it close at Wisconsin, having at one point a 38-30 lead with 12 minutes left in the second half, mostly because teams succeed in draining threes against Wisconsin. While these are two of the slowest offensive teams, Michigan can use its long possession time effectively by draining threes. They are also decently physical in the interior. They contained Nigel Hayes both times they played, Hayes had just a 94 offensive rating at home vs Mich, scoring 13 points, and and a 77 offensive rating on the road with just 6 points. I don't think this is going to be a game where he can make a significant contribution like he did against Northwestern. Michigan's defense, overall, isn't that bad. They're ranked 152nd in efficiency on the season, but in the top 100 in the last three. And Wisconsin's offense, obviously, isn't that potent. Wisconsin's offense has lately been relying more than usual on the three-ball, including attempting 29 threes against Northwestern. They will surely have to change that against Michigan, against whom Minnesota put up only 13 threes, Illinois 15 and Purdue 19 including in overtime. I think Michigan has the tools on offense, and can do enough on defense, to keep this game within a bucket, if not achieve the outright win.
Personally not confident enough to bet less than +1.5 against a team superior in defensive efficiency and rebounding like Wisconsin is. We need Michigan to make shots. We need their magic to continue. It's a tough judgement of probability: making shots versus consistently good defense. I think this is more or less a coin-flip game. Definitely not worth a large play. But I think Wisconsin has proven to be a team that Michigan can succeed shooting against, and the better they shoot, the more that counters Wisconsin's clear edge in rebounding.
0
Personally not confident enough to bet less than +1.5 against a team superior in defensive efficiency and rebounding like Wisconsin is. We need Michigan to make shots. We need their magic to continue. It's a tough judgement of probability: making shots versus consistently good defense. I think this is more or less a coin-flip game. Definitely not worth a large play. But I think Wisconsin has proven to be a team that Michigan can succeed shooting against, and the better they shoot, the more that counters Wisconsin's clear edge in rebounding.
I am on the other side of you today. Wisconsin has shut down two decent offenses in their last two games plus have been getting hot on their own offensive end.
Last game even with springs out Michigan was only able to close out the game with an absolute take over from Walton Jr.
I think Wisconsin gets it done today, but BOL!
0
I am on the other side of you today. Wisconsin has shut down two decent offenses in their last two games plus have been getting hot on their own offensive end.
Last game even with springs out Michigan was only able to close out the game with an absolute take over from Walton Jr.
I am on the other side of you today. Wisconsin has shut down two decent offenses in their last two games plus have been getting hot on their own offensive end.
Last game even with springs out Michigan was only able to close out the game with an absolute take over from Walton Jr.
I think Wisconsin gets it done today, but BOL!
And when Michigan beat Wisconsin, Walton had but 5 points with 1/8 shooting. But I wouldn't be shocked if you're right, Wisconsin is a good team that's well-coached and has a solid defense. I think it's a close game either way! BOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by SteveBOL:
I am on the other side of you today. Wisconsin has shut down two decent offenses in their last two games plus have been getting hot on their own offensive end.
Last game even with springs out Michigan was only able to close out the game with an absolute take over from Walton Jr.
I think Wisconsin gets it done today, but BOL!
And when Michigan beat Wisconsin, Walton had but 5 points with 1/8 shooting. But I wouldn't be shocked if you're right, Wisconsin is a good team that's well-coached and has a solid defense. I think it's a close game either way! BOL
Ah typo in my write-up, sorry, Wisc is 4th in opposing three-point attempts, 13th in opposing three-point %. I think the opposing three-point attempts statistic is slightly skewed in Wisconsin's favor because the slow pace they play means that teams won't put up so many shots, so I think the opposing three-point % is a bit more telling of their perimeter defense
The +2 has arrived at 5dimes and a couple other books I think...it's coming...grab that value...
0
Ah typo in my write-up, sorry, Wisc is 4th in opposing three-point attempts, 13th in opposing three-point %. I think the opposing three-point attempts statistic is slightly skewed in Wisconsin's favor because the slow pace they play means that teams won't put up so many shots, so I think the opposing three-point % is a bit more telling of their perimeter defense
The +2 has arrived at 5dimes and a couple other books I think...it's coming...grab that value...
Personally not confident enough to bet less than +1.5 against a team superior in defensive efficiency and rebounding like Wisconsin is. We need Michigan to make shots.
Wise man once said..."don't bet on a team that you don't think can outright win"
If you are not willing to take +1.5 what's +3 or more really gonna do?
Unless you are a really good #'s guy and find great value in that range, just pick a winner baby
0
Quote Originally Posted by ProudJagsfan:
Personally not confident enough to bet less than +1.5 against a team superior in defensive efficiency and rebounding like Wisconsin is. We need Michigan to make shots.
Wise man once said..."don't bet on a team that you don't think can outright win"
If you are not willing to take +1.5 what's +3 or more really gonna do?
Unless you are a really good #'s guy and find great value in that range, just pick a winner baby
If Michigan maintains a lead at halftime, I suggest we go for the middle. Wisconsin is a strong second-half team. The bigger the first half lead for Michigan the better the chance of middling.
0
If Michigan maintains a lead at halftime, I suggest we go for the middle. Wisconsin is a strong second-half team. The bigger the first half lead for Michigan the better the chance of middling.
Jags just wanted to say I really enjoy your breakdowns of all these games I'm new on here been about 2 months and just started posting regularly with Ivy tournament (live 3 min from Princeton campus) so I've been to almost every home game. If I like a game with my own research and see you on it it usually puts me over the top, and then like today if I'm unsure ab a game and see u on the opposite I stay away! (Wisconsin) GL today and hopefully we both win some money next week during the tourny!
0
Jags just wanted to say I really enjoy your breakdowns of all these games I'm new on here been about 2 months and just started posting regularly with Ivy tournament (live 3 min from Princeton campus) so I've been to almost every home game. If I like a game with my own research and see you on it it usually puts me over the top, and then like today if I'm unsure ab a game and see u on the opposite I stay away! (Wisconsin) GL today and hopefully we both win some money next week during the tourny!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.