On that day (1/26), you went 4-6 with 1 Push which made your record 215-184 at the end of 1/26.
You've only posed a total of 5 plays since 1/26 with the record on those 5 plays being 2-3... You went 0-2 on 2/6 and 2-1 on 2/7.
That makes your posted record now 217-187 before today's (2/8) plays. All of this can be verified via your post history.
I'm therefore confused where this 252-212 record you're using now is coming from?
Thanks for your help!
We were in the smokey mts on vacation celebrating retirement,didn't have computer I was able to make bets on phone when we got a signal,I just didn't try to get on covers,to much hassle. I could go through and copy and paste all my bets,but not going to do so. Been here almost 15 years,no need to do that.
0
Quote Originally Posted by CoversCapReport:
Hi totter,
There's a significant discrepancy with your posted record that I would like to try and figure out with you.
Per your own thread on 1/26, your record was 211-178 before those day's plays. Seen here:
On that day (1/26), you went 4-6 with 1 Push which made your record 215-184 at the end of 1/26.
You've only posed a total of 5 plays since 1/26 with the record on those 5 plays being 2-3... You went 0-2 on 2/6 and 2-1 on 2/7.
That makes your posted record now 217-187 before today's (2/8) plays. All of this can be verified via your post history.
I'm therefore confused where this 252-212 record you're using now is coming from?
Thanks for your help!
We were in the smokey mts on vacation celebrating retirement,didn't have computer I was able to make bets on phone when we got a signal,I just didn't try to get on covers,to much hassle. I could go through and copy and paste all my bets,but not going to do so. Been here almost 15 years,no need to do that.
Nice try totter but you just got caught blatantly lying about your record.
You could've at least tried being less obvious with your shilling.
That new poster "coverfraud" might not actually be totter. Maybe whoever created that account did so with the sole purpose of bringing attention to totter's false record?
Read again what he wrote.. He sure was over the top with the whole "I really appreciate you posting an accurate and honest record!!" bit. What a very strange thing to say as your 1st post on Covers which is why I think "coverfraud" had the ulterior motive of exposing totter. Even his screen name says as much.. "Covers fraud". It's pretty obvious.
I'm guessing "coverfraud" discovered on his own that totter's record is false and devised this sneaky way to shine light on it. It definitely caught the eye of poster "CoversCapReport" who carefully tracks and documents everyone's records on a weekly basis. So it's highly likely "coverfraud" achieved the exact result he desired from the beginning (i.e. to expose totter).
0
Quote Originally Posted by dallman:
Nice try totter but you just got caught blatantly lying about your record.
You could've at least tried being less obvious with your shilling.
That new poster "coverfraud" might not actually be totter. Maybe whoever created that account did so with the sole purpose of bringing attention to totter's false record?
Read again what he wrote.. He sure was over the top with the whole "I really appreciate you posting an accurate and honest record!!" bit. What a very strange thing to say as your 1st post on Covers which is why I think "coverfraud" had the ulterior motive of exposing totter. Even his screen name says as much.. "Covers fraud". It's pretty obvious.
I'm guessing "coverfraud" discovered on his own that totter's record is false and devised this sneaky way to shine light on it. It definitely caught the eye of poster "CoversCapReport" who carefully tracks and documents everyone's records on a weekly basis. So it's highly likely "coverfraud" achieved the exact result he desired from the beginning (i.e. to expose totter).
Totter is blaming it on the Smokey Mountains, but he was propping up his record as early as opening day. That's why I caught on to it, this literally started right from the very beginning. Below are his first 4 posts of the season, and he propped up his record on 3 of the 4 days to ensure that he did not have to post from early hole. He had a few other unposted winners as well in November. Totter is right around .500 this season in reality. Just because you are an old friendly retired guy doesn't mean you can post a fraud record.
But what CoversCapReport missed, this was actually the third time that Totter came back from a brief hiatus and magically hit a high percentage during that time. He went "19-7" the first time, "15-8" the second time, and then whatever it was this third time. Yet despite all of this nobody seemed to notice.
0
Totter is blaming it on the Smokey Mountains, but he was propping up his record as early as opening day. That's why I caught on to it, this literally started right from the very beginning. Below are his first 4 posts of the season, and he propped up his record on 3 of the 4 days to ensure that he did not have to post from early hole. He had a few other unposted winners as well in November. Totter is right around .500 this season in reality. Just because you are an old friendly retired guy doesn't mean you can post a fraud record.
But what CoversCapReport missed, this was actually the third time that Totter came back from a brief hiatus and magically hit a high percentage during that time. He went "19-7" the first time, "15-8" the second time, and then whatever it was this third time. Yet despite all of this nobody seemed to notice.
Nice try totter but you just got caught blatantly lying about your record.You could've at least tried being less obvious with your shilling.
That new poster "coverfraud" might not actually be totter. Maybe whoever created that account did so with the sole purpose of bringing attention to totter's false record?Read again what he wrote.. He sure was over the top with the whole "I really appreciate you posting an accurate and honest record!!" bit. What a very strange thing to say as your 1st post on Covers which is why I think "coverfraud" had the ulterior motive of exposing totter. Even his screen name says as much.. "Covers fraud". It's pretty obvious.I'm guessing "coverfraud" discovered on his own that totter's record is false and devised this sneaky way to shine light on it. It definitely caught the eye of poster "CoversCapReport" who carefully tracks and documents everyone's records on a weekly basis. So it's highly likely "coverfraud" achieved the exact result he desired from the beginning (i.e. to expose totter).
Looks like you were right about coverfraud. I hadn't even thought of this situation from that angle. coverfraud definitely nailed totter to the wall and got people to notice.
In this case I've got no issues with coverfraud if in fact this is the 3rd time totter has blatantly lied about his record.
0
Quote Originally Posted by pepp:
Quote Originally Posted by dallman:
Nice try totter but you just got caught blatantly lying about your record.You could've at least tried being less obvious with your shilling.
That new poster "coverfraud" might not actually be totter. Maybe whoever created that account did so with the sole purpose of bringing attention to totter's false record?Read again what he wrote.. He sure was over the top with the whole "I really appreciate you posting an accurate and honest record!!" bit. What a very strange thing to say as your 1st post on Covers which is why I think "coverfraud" had the ulterior motive of exposing totter. Even his screen name says as much.. "Covers fraud". It's pretty obvious.I'm guessing "coverfraud" discovered on his own that totter's record is false and devised this sneaky way to shine light on it. It definitely caught the eye of poster "CoversCapReport" who carefully tracks and documents everyone's records on a weekly basis. So it's highly likely "coverfraud" achieved the exact result he desired from the beginning (i.e. to expose totter).
Looks like you were right about coverfraud. I hadn't even thought of this situation from that angle. coverfraud definitely nailed totter to the wall and got people to notice.
In this case I've got no issues with coverfraud if in fact this is the 3rd time totter has blatantly lied about his record.
I just read your claim that this is the third time this has happened with totter's record. Can you please provide concrete dates for these other two apparent instances so I can verify one way or another?
To be clear to totter and anyone else reading this thread - this is the first time I've found a discrepancy with totter's record in my weekly process so it's important to remain fair and neutral.
If coverfraud does not provide concrete proof of these other two apparent instances for me to research, I will consider that claim baseless and move forward with a record of 217-189 for totter as of the end of day 2/8 which includes totter's 0-2 record for 2/8.
This record reflects posted plays only, not inclusive of any other plays which were apparently made but not posted. This is the same rule that applies for every handicapper - only posted plays on this forum count towards one's record.
0
coverfraud,
I just read your claim that this is the third time this has happened with totter's record. Can you please provide concrete dates for these other two apparent instances so I can verify one way or another?
To be clear to totter and anyone else reading this thread - this is the first time I've found a discrepancy with totter's record in my weekly process so it's important to remain fair and neutral.
If coverfraud does not provide concrete proof of these other two apparent instances for me to research, I will consider that claim baseless and move forward with a record of 217-189 for totter as of the end of day 2/8 which includes totter's 0-2 record for 2/8.
This record reflects posted plays only, not inclusive of any other plays which were apparently made but not posted. This is the same rule that applies for every handicapper - only posted plays on this forum count towards one's record.
Well on 1/4/19 Totty said his record was 142-116 (which was fake), he went 0-1 that day to make it 142-117.
His next post was on 1/8, and he said his record was 161-124.
It was a great 19-7 fake run during those 3 days, featuring some spot-on fake bets.
Then he had his fake record at 187-156 on 1/19, and he went 5-6 to make the record 192-162. He took a few days off again, came back on 1/23 and said his record was 207-170. Another nice 15-8 fake run featuring some terrific fake wagers.
But again, this started right from the beginning. Go look at his first 4 posts of the season. He was 8-12-1 through the first 4 days, but had himself at 14-12-1. He would go on to add a few non-posted wins later that month. He is .500 on the season
0
Well on 1/4/19 Totty said his record was 142-116 (which was fake), he went 0-1 that day to make it 142-117.
His next post was on 1/8, and he said his record was 161-124.
It was a great 19-7 fake run during those 3 days, featuring some spot-on fake bets.
Then he had his fake record at 187-156 on 1/19, and he went 5-6 to make the record 192-162. He took a few days off again, came back on 1/23 and said his record was 207-170. Another nice 15-8 fake run featuring some terrific fake wagers.
But again, this started right from the beginning. Go look at his first 4 posts of the season. He was 8-12-1 through the first 4 days, but had himself at 14-12-1. He would go on to add a few non-posted wins later that month. He is .500 on the season
Wow. Coverfraud is right.. totter has been blatantly lying about his record throughout the season.
CoversCapReport.. Have you had a chance yet to look into those dates that coverfraud provided? He's actually right.. totter has been blatantly lying the whole time.
0
Wow. Coverfraud is right.. totter has been blatantly lying about his record throughout the season.
CoversCapReport.. Have you had a chance yet to look into those dates that coverfraud provided? He's actually right.. totter has been blatantly lying the whole time.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.