I don't have much time to explain the system, however I WILL. These picks are not for tailing purposes, or even to influence anyone in their choice of games to bet on. I simply want to create a track record for this system and then get some feedback from other bettors using similar type criteria.
So far today..
Providence +5.5 Fordham +14.5 Northeastern/NC Wilmington under 123 E Mich/Ohio over 132.5 Oklahoma St +5 Air Force/Colorado St under 131.5
I will probably have to tighten up the rules. This is a lot of plays in one session, but lets see how it goes. I'll be back in a little bit to explain what this system is and see if anyone is familiar.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I don't have much time to explain the system, however I WILL. These picks are not for tailing purposes, or even to influence anyone in their choice of games to bet on. I simply want to create a track record for this system and then get some feedback from other bettors using similar type criteria.
So far today..
Providence +5.5 Fordham +14.5 Northeastern/NC Wilmington under 123 E Mich/Ohio over 132.5 Oklahoma St +5 Air Force/Colorado St under 131.5
I will probably have to tighten up the rules. This is a lot of plays in one session, but lets see how it goes. I'll be back in a little bit to explain what this system is and see if anyone is familiar.
K, so maybe it needs some fine tuning... Here is what the system is based on. It has done well over the past week or so. If anyone has experience with this school of thought your insight is welcomed.
Using Kenpom as a guide to a predicted outcome. I then took the games that had large deviations from predicted spreads and totals to actual published lines. With each game that had a line that was off from the predicted spread by more than 3 I would look further into. From here I looked at % of bets and line movement to determine how much to wager on each pick. For example, Texas Tech was predicted to lose by 16. The line was posted at 11 1/2. 60% of the bets (at an offshore sportsbook) were on Iowa St. The line then moved to 10 by tip off. Obviously today was not profitable but I am curious of the long term validity of this system. I will continue to post and work on this until I can see whether this carries value or not.
If you have Insight/opinions/experience with a similar system please feel free to share.
0
K, so maybe it needs some fine tuning... Here is what the system is based on. It has done well over the past week or so. If anyone has experience with this school of thought your insight is welcomed.
Using Kenpom as a guide to a predicted outcome. I then took the games that had large deviations from predicted spreads and totals to actual published lines. With each game that had a line that was off from the predicted spread by more than 3 I would look further into. From here I looked at % of bets and line movement to determine how much to wager on each pick. For example, Texas Tech was predicted to lose by 16. The line was posted at 11 1/2. 60% of the bets (at an offshore sportsbook) were on Iowa St. The line then moved to 10 by tip off. Obviously today was not profitable but I am curious of the long term validity of this system. I will continue to post and work on this until I can see whether this carries value or not.
If you have Insight/opinions/experience with a similar system please feel free to share.
Here is the problem with systems... they 99.9% of the time don't work. The biggest reason is the outcomes of events are not intertwined. Each event is determined by its own set of parameters.
We often times can see structure in the noise because of the nature of mathematics. Bible code... Da Vinci code..etc. are examples of finding structure within chaos.
The nature of systems is they are easy to backfeed ...but they typically don't translate well into predicting future events. Lets face it..people have been trying to predict future events since the beginning... and its very very very hard to do.
I am not saying your system won't work... because a decent % can and will succeed in the short term... long term is typically a different story. good luck
0
Here is the problem with systems... they 99.9% of the time don't work. The biggest reason is the outcomes of events are not intertwined. Each event is determined by its own set of parameters.
We often times can see structure in the noise because of the nature of mathematics. Bible code... Da Vinci code..etc. are examples of finding structure within chaos.
The nature of systems is they are easy to backfeed ...but they typically don't translate well into predicting future events. Lets face it..people have been trying to predict future events since the beginning... and its very very very hard to do.
I am not saying your system won't work... because a decent % can and will succeed in the short term... long term is typically a different story. good luck
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.