I personally like the over 160.5 here especially after Syracuse had 130ish total yesterday with Tennessee, gambling doens't have to make sense, however why is the total line for the 1st half set as 76.5 ?!
I mean, if the total is 160.5 why isn't it 80.5 for the 1st half?
If they score 75-77 pts in the 1st half exactly you can be pretty assured the total won't be 160 but less than that....
So what am I missing here?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I personally like the over 160.5 here especially after Syracuse had 130ish total yesterday with Tennessee, gambling doens't have to make sense, however why is the total line for the 1st half set as 76.5 ?!
I mean, if the total is 160.5 why isn't it 80.5 for the 1st half?
If they score 75-77 pts in the 1st half exactly you can be pretty assured the total won't be 160 but less than that....
I personally like the over 160.5 here especially after Syracuse had 130ish total yesterday with Tennessee, gambling doens't have to make sense, however why is the total line for the 1st half set as 76.5 ?! I mean, if the total is 160.5 why isn't it 80.5 for the 1st half? If they score 75-77 pts in the 1st half exactly you can be pretty assured the total won't be 160 but less than that.... So what am I missing here?
The way ncaab 1h is that the game total 160.5 -10 = 150.5. Then divide it by 2, that would make it 75 (± 2 ) is where the book will set the line at. Do the same for other game to see if I'm right.
1
Quote Originally Posted by NBAAddiction18:
I personally like the over 160.5 here especially after Syracuse had 130ish total yesterday with Tennessee, gambling doens't have to make sense, however why is the total line for the 1st half set as 76.5 ?! I mean, if the total is 160.5 why isn't it 80.5 for the 1st half? If they score 75-77 pts in the 1st half exactly you can be pretty assured the total won't be 160 but less than that.... So what am I missing here?
The way ncaab 1h is that the game total 160.5 -10 = 150.5. Then divide it by 2, that would make it 75 (± 2 ) is where the book will set the line at. Do the same for other game to see if I'm right.
Here is how u figure a 1st half total. If the line is 160 pts for the game. U subtract 10pts off of it and divide by 2. The first half line should be 75pts. Now there is your lesson for the day. Thsts how a first half line is set. Falcon Sports
being 76.5 and not 75, would that be a lean to the over?
It's all probabilities
0
Quote Originally Posted by MITM:
Here is how u figure a 1st half total. If the line is 160 pts for the game. U subtract 10pts off of it and divide by 2. The first half line should be 75pts. Now there is your lesson for the day. Thsts how a first half line is set. Falcon Sports
being 76.5 and not 75, would that be a lean to the over?
It’s the rims at the Stan Sherrif Arena. It’s Clanky. Totals are inflated because it suppose to be at the Lahaina Civic center where the rims were super soft and easy to score. All under so far in all games. Unless they make a clean shot it’s not going in. 3 point shooting has been horrible in the tourney. Hence all the unders
Mayweather bet 450000 on
0
o@CHITOWNODAWG
It’s the rims at the Stan Sherrif Arena. It’s Clanky. Totals are inflated because it suppose to be at the Lahaina Civic center where the rims were super soft and easy to score. All under so far in all games. Unless they make a clean shot it’s not going in. 3 point shooting has been horrible in the tourney. Hence all the unders
Very good point previous yrs Maui invitational balls bounce off the rim have a good chance going in, if u saw ucla marq last night a lot of the basketballs underneath were off backboard 1st
0
@davemsh
Very good point previous yrs Maui invitational balls bounce off the rim have a good chance going in, if u saw ucla marq last night a lot of the basketballs underneath were off backboard 1st
I get that but I just dont like the horrible linemaking, this line should have been in the low 130's nothing commanded it being 160 other than them just setting it at that number
0
I get that but I just dont like the horrible linemaking, this line should have been in the low 130's nothing commanded it being 160 other than them just setting it at that number
Suppose to be the best ever pre season tourney with the #1 #2 #4 #7 #11 teams and UCLA and Cuse and it’s been a dud tourney so far. The venue makes a huge difference. If played in Maui you would always have high scoring close games down to the wire.
Mayweather bet 450000 on
0
Suppose to be the best ever pre season tourney with the #1 #2 #4 #7 #11 teams and UCLA and Cuse and it’s been a dud tourney so far. The venue makes a huge difference. If played in Maui you would always have high scoring close games down to the wire.
Suppose to be the best ever pre season tourney with the #1 #2 #4 #7 #11 teams and UCLA and Cuse and it’s been a dud tourney so far. The venue makes a huge difference. If played in Maui you would always have high scoring close games down to the wire.
you got that right brother
The impossible only takes longer….
0
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:
Suppose to be the best ever pre season tourney with the #1 #2 #4 #7 #11 teams and UCLA and Cuse and it’s been a dud tourney so far. The venue makes a huge difference. If played in Maui you would always have high scoring close games down to the wire.
The crowd is lame that’s why. No energy for teams to push and run and gun back and forth. No way can u take an over in the remaining games. Totals seems inflated for no reason.
Even #1 Kansas only put up 83 points on Chamainade yesterday. If in Maui Kansas puts up 100+ weird tourney so far. 83 points vs a division 2 teams tells h how hard it is to score
Mayweather bet 450000 on
0
@wolfeman3
The crowd is lame that’s why. No energy for teams to push and run and gun back and forth. No way can u take an over in the remaining games. Totals seems inflated for no reason.
Even #1 Kansas only put up 83 points on Chamainade yesterday. If in Maui Kansas puts up 100+ weird tourney so far. 83 points vs a division 2 teams tells h how hard it is to score
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.