As far as I know he is not playing today. Rutgers is my best play of
the day. Vegas always give out lines that might be freebees well today I
think this is one of them. The public first reaction is to throw money
on Wisconsin of course 4th rank team in the nation vs a bad Rutgers
team. If you watch college basketball in the past few year you would
know Rutgers always show up in game where people least expect them to,
specially within there own conference.
This something anyone can
do them selves, look up how many points Frank have scored in the past 8
games. Subtract his point scored from the final score of the game
(Wisconsin team points).
The Final score of each game subtracting Frank points scored from the final score right side:
There
record would be 3 - 5 and on top of that if the spread was +17 1/2 for
each team that they played in their last 8 games they would be 2 - 6 ATS
with Frank Kaminsky out of the lineup, give me Rutgers !!!! I have
them at +17 1/2 even if they were + 15 I would still take Rutgers large.
Yes I will be a little nervous just because Rutgers is Rutgers and Wisconsin is Wisconsin BUT by Frank not being in the game I see Rutgers playing a tough game and being bale to keep within distance of the spread.
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
As far as I know he is not playing today. Rutgers is my best play of
the day. Vegas always give out lines that might be freebees well today I
think this is one of them. The public first reaction is to throw money
on Wisconsin of course 4th rank team in the nation vs a bad Rutgers
team. If you watch college basketball in the past few year you would
know Rutgers always show up in game where people least expect them to,
specially within there own conference.
This something anyone can
do them selves, look up how many points Frank have scored in the past 8
games. Subtract his point scored from the final score of the game
(Wisconsin team points).
The Final score of each game subtracting Frank points scored from the final score right side:
There
record would be 3 - 5 and on top of that if the spread was +17 1/2 for
each team that they played in their last 8 games they would be 2 - 6 ATS
with Frank Kaminsky out of the lineup, give me Rutgers !!!! I have
them at +17 1/2 even if they were + 15 I would still take Rutgers large.
Yes I will be a little nervous just because Rutgers is Rutgers and Wisconsin is Wisconsin BUT by Frank not being in the game I see Rutgers playing a tough game and being bale to keep within distance of the spread.
I'm on the same side but your logic is flawed. You can't just subtract the points he scored and assume nobody else would've scored on those possessions.
I'm on the same side but your logic is flawed. You can't just subtract the points he scored and assume nobody else would've scored on those possessions.
I'm on the same side but your logic is flawed. You can't just subtract the points he scored and assume nobody else would've scored on those possessions.
You are correct, but there are many more things that go into it I just didnt feel like going through them all like Frank present being down low in the paint, his rebounds per game his blocks etc... He is the best player on Wisconsin and that means a while lot to me in my book.
Quote Originally Posted by PickASide:
I'm on the same side but your logic is flawed. You can't just subtract the points he scored and assume nobody else would've scored on those possessions.
You are correct, but there are many more things that go into it I just didnt feel like going through them all like Frank present being down low in the paint, his rebounds per game his blocks etc... He is the best player on Wisconsin and that means a while lot to me in my book.