I had this line capped at SDSU -4, and now I see that it is a ridiculous UCLA -2.5?
I am absolutely BAFFLED by this line. UCLA is down to eight scholarship guys (Anderson, Muhammad, Drew, Powell, Wear1, Wear2, Drew, Parker), and possibly only seven tonight depending on Parker's status (he was wearing a walking boot in the middle of the week). Even WITH Parker, UCLA will be at a significant disadvantage on the glass -- and that's not counting the inherent difficulty of keeping SDSU off of the offensive boards when you play zone like UCLA will have to. If Parker can't go, that means Wear1 and Wear2 are the post men and will get HUGE minutes... those guys are a lot of things, but rebounders are not one of them.
This line sticks out in my mind as being so far off, I can't remember one like it in a long, long time.
This will NOT be a home game for UCLA either. With the apathy in the program, I would expect that SDSU will have more fans at the game and more support from the crowd.
SDSU +2.5 LARGE
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I had this line capped at SDSU -4, and now I see that it is a ridiculous UCLA -2.5?
I am absolutely BAFFLED by this line. UCLA is down to eight scholarship guys (Anderson, Muhammad, Drew, Powell, Wear1, Wear2, Drew, Parker), and possibly only seven tonight depending on Parker's status (he was wearing a walking boot in the middle of the week). Even WITH Parker, UCLA will be at a significant disadvantage on the glass -- and that's not counting the inherent difficulty of keeping SDSU off of the offensive boards when you play zone like UCLA will have to. If Parker can't go, that means Wear1 and Wear2 are the post men and will get HUGE minutes... those guys are a lot of things, but rebounders are not one of them.
This line sticks out in my mind as being so far off, I can't remember one like it in a long, long time.
This will NOT be a home game for UCLA either. With the apathy in the program, I would expect that SDSU will have more fans at the game and more support from the crowd.
It's 'Tapley' dude. Anyhow ... I'd sure like to know if he is good to go or not tonight. SDSU is going to need all hands on deck in terms of perimeter scoring to win this thing ...
0
It's 'Tapley' dude. Anyhow ... I'd sure like to know if he is good to go or not tonight. SDSU is going to need all hands on deck in terms of perimeter scoring to win this thing ...
there is a couple people on twitter saying he is probable and then active tonight.. who knows though
still, UCLA talented yes, but they still have some things to work out no? can the raw young talent beat a solid experience SD st team?? seems like taking the points is a solid play in this one
0
there is a couple people on twitter saying he is probable and then active tonight.. who knows though
still, UCLA talented yes, but they still have some things to work out no? can the raw young talent beat a solid experience SD st team?? seems like taking the points is a solid play in this one
I watched the SD ST. play at USC last week. USC is bad. SD ST. barely beat them. They are a bunch of thugs that don't play smart. Take the Bruins tonight. I like them a lot.
0
I watched the SD ST. play at USC last week. USC is bad. SD ST. barely beat them. They are a bunch of thugs that don't play smart. Take the Bruins tonight. I like them a lot.
I had this line capped at SDSU -4, and now I see that it is a ridiculous UCLA -2.5?
I am absolutely BAFFLED by this line. UCLA is down to eight scholarship guys (Anderson, Muhammad, Drew, Powell, Wear1, Wear2, Drew, Parker), and possibly only seven tonight depending on Parker's status (he was wearing a walking boot in the middle of the week). Even WITH Parker, UCLA will be at a significant disadvantage on the glass -- and that's not counting the inherent difficulty of keeping SDSU off of the offensive boards when you play zone like UCLA will have to. If Parker can't go, that means Wear1 and Wear2 are the post men and will get HUGE minutes... those guys are a lot of things, but rebounders are not one of them.
This line sticks out in my mind as being so far off, I can't remember one like it in a long, long time.
This will NOT be a home game for UCLA either. With the apathy in the program, I would expect that SDSU will have more fans at the game and more support from the crowd.
SDSU +2.5 LARGE
Everything you said in the analysis was dead accurate. I was surprised seeing the San Diego State crowd was larger than the UCLA crowd @ UCLA! You forecasted that correctly.
One thing you forgot to mention was that UCLA lost at home to CAL POLY. That was what solidified it for me.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
I had this line capped at SDSU -4, and now I see that it is a ridiculous UCLA -2.5?
I am absolutely BAFFLED by this line. UCLA is down to eight scholarship guys (Anderson, Muhammad, Drew, Powell, Wear1, Wear2, Drew, Parker), and possibly only seven tonight depending on Parker's status (he was wearing a walking boot in the middle of the week). Even WITH Parker, UCLA will be at a significant disadvantage on the glass -- and that's not counting the inherent difficulty of keeping SDSU off of the offensive boards when you play zone like UCLA will have to. If Parker can't go, that means Wear1 and Wear2 are the post men and will get HUGE minutes... those guys are a lot of things, but rebounders are not one of them.
This line sticks out in my mind as being so far off, I can't remember one like it in a long, long time.
This will NOT be a home game for UCLA either. With the apathy in the program, I would expect that SDSU will have more fans at the game and more support from the crowd.
SDSU +2.5 LARGE
Everything you said in the analysis was dead accurate. I was surprised seeing the San Diego State crowd was larger than the UCLA crowd @ UCLA! You forecasted that correctly.
One thing you forgot to mention was that UCLA lost at home to CAL POLY. That was what solidified it for me.
Everything you said in the analysis was dead accurate. I was surprised seeing the San Diego State crowd was larger than the UCLA crowd @ UCLA! You forecasted that correctly.
One thing you forgot to mention was that UCLA lost at home to CAL POLY. That was what solidified it for me.
Game wasn't even played at UCLA, it was in Anaheim which is in Orange County in between Westwood and San Diego. Half/Half but surprisingly all the fans seemed to be SDSU.
0
Quote Originally Posted by nittanycougar:
Everything you said in the analysis was dead accurate. I was surprised seeing the San Diego State crowd was larger than the UCLA crowd @ UCLA! You forecasted that correctly.
One thing you forgot to mention was that UCLA lost at home to CAL POLY. That was what solidified it for me.
Game wasn't even played at UCLA, it was in Anaheim which is in Orange County in between Westwood and San Diego. Half/Half but surprisingly all the fans seemed to be SDSU.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.