Does anyone here do this? For example, say for a game there is a team
that is favored by 10 points for the game. And at the end of the first
half, they are down by some ridiculous number of points, say like 15
points.
Obviously 2nd half, they will be giving a lot of
points. Lets say its 9.5. So basically the full game is now the under
laying 5.5 for the game as oppose to getting 10 points which is like a
15.5 point differential. You can use another example like a team is
laying 7 points for the game and is down 8 points at end of first half.
Then the 2nd half line is that team -8 or 9, basically making the game
pickem for the full game.
Is it me, or does it seem like taking a
team that is heavily favored in the 2nd half b/c they are down a lot of
points at end of 1st half a good idea? I mean, rarely will that team
just not make some sort of comeback and make it respectable. And if you
do take that team is up say 15 points at end of 1st half and getting
say 9.5 in the 2nd half, you are hoping this 10 point underdog for the
full game covers 5.5.
What i notice is rarely do teams just lay
down if they are heavily favored. I mean, once the game goes to a tie
game in the 4th quarter, its just really hard for that underdog for the
full game to even WIN THE GAME... let alone cover 5.5 points if you get
what i mean.
Does anyone have stats on this for the 2nd half? I
also seen stuff like a team laying 7 points and then have some
ridiculous halftime lead, like 22 points. Then for 2nd half, the other
team might be -2 or so, so name full game is now that favorite -20
instead of -7. Is it me, or is taking that team +2 for 2nd half really
ridiciouls because you are hoping that team covers 20 points. I mean,
many times teams give up leads and they could not even cover for the
full game!
Thoughts on this strategy? There are 2 ones here of
course. The big favorite laying a lot of points but down a lot at the
half and of course a team that is favored by has a HUGE lead at the
half. Like -2 for the game but up 20 points at the half. So situations
like this, 2nd half would be losing team - points but they would be at
least +14 for the full game usually.
Thoughts?
Yes i know its the ncaab forum but it still applies as well though i feel like some teams in the ncaab can easily get blown out. Nba to me though is much less likely.
Anyone have numbers on this?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Does anyone here do this? For example, say for a game there is a team
that is favored by 10 points for the game. And at the end of the first
half, they are down by some ridiculous number of points, say like 15
points.
Obviously 2nd half, they will be giving a lot of
points. Lets say its 9.5. So basically the full game is now the under
laying 5.5 for the game as oppose to getting 10 points which is like a
15.5 point differential. You can use another example like a team is
laying 7 points for the game and is down 8 points at end of first half.
Then the 2nd half line is that team -8 or 9, basically making the game
pickem for the full game.
Is it me, or does it seem like taking a
team that is heavily favored in the 2nd half b/c they are down a lot of
points at end of 1st half a good idea? I mean, rarely will that team
just not make some sort of comeback and make it respectable. And if you
do take that team is up say 15 points at end of 1st half and getting
say 9.5 in the 2nd half, you are hoping this 10 point underdog for the
full game covers 5.5.
What i notice is rarely do teams just lay
down if they are heavily favored. I mean, once the game goes to a tie
game in the 4th quarter, its just really hard for that underdog for the
full game to even WIN THE GAME... let alone cover 5.5 points if you get
what i mean.
Does anyone have stats on this for the 2nd half? I
also seen stuff like a team laying 7 points and then have some
ridiculous halftime lead, like 22 points. Then for 2nd half, the other
team might be -2 or so, so name full game is now that favorite -20
instead of -7. Is it me, or is taking that team +2 for 2nd half really
ridiciouls because you are hoping that team covers 20 points. I mean,
many times teams give up leads and they could not even cover for the
full game!
Thoughts on this strategy? There are 2 ones here of
course. The big favorite laying a lot of points but down a lot at the
half and of course a team that is favored by has a HUGE lead at the
half. Like -2 for the game but up 20 points at the half. So situations
like this, 2nd half would be losing team - points but they would be at
least +14 for the full game usually.
Thoughts?
Yes i know its the ncaab forum but it still applies as well though i feel like some teams in the ncaab can easily get blown out. Nba to me though is much less likely.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.