In 2 of 3 rounds so far in the NIT, UCF has been dominating their opponent, only the score does not show this dominance, because the Golden Knights have taken their foot off late in the game, only to reassert themselves and cover. I think the wrong team is favored in this matchup and UCF has a great chance to win straight-up. It all starts on defense. UCF's defense is 17th in efficiency and is anchored by 7'6 tall Tacko Fall, who helps his team ably protect the rim without putting the opponent on the line. TCU relies mostly on its interior for points and this reliance makes this matchup bad for them. They rely most on their big man--who is still over 6 inches shorter than Fall--Brodziansky, on offense. But he has really struggled against teams with length and height in the interior--at Baylor, for instance, he just had 6 points, and I expect a similar struggle here. While Baylor's big men are more athletic than those of UCF, I expect UCF to still be able to contain Brodziansky. TCU relies for most of its points inside with Brodziansky, but UCF has the #1 opposing 2 point %. But also, TCU will be unable to pose a significant threat to UCF's top-25 perimeter defense on the perimeter. They also lost a fairly important contributor in Fisher, who could have brought the necessary help to attack the sturdy UCF defense from behind the arc. UCF also has the advantage in guard play, led by BJ Taylor who has been averaging over 20 a game in the tournament. Despite his scoring prowess, he has been relatively cold from behind the arc, going just 2/9 from three in his past 2 games. However, he averages 35% from behind the arc on the season and this is why he has all the more upside coming into this game. TCU struggled to contain Iowa's versatile scorers, Bohannon and Jok, who combined for more than 40 points because they are able both to drive it to the rim and knock down three pointers. I think Williams and Taylor are capable of providing this kind of powerful and versatile attack for UCF against a rather non-intimidating half-court defense. UCF has the superior defense and more upside on offense. They should dominate the interior and match up well enough to contain TCU's highest-scorer. UCF has been enjoying success against teams from the major conferences and I think they continue to do so tomorrow night. Take UCF +2.5
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
In 2 of 3 rounds so far in the NIT, UCF has been dominating their opponent, only the score does not show this dominance, because the Golden Knights have taken their foot off late in the game, only to reassert themselves and cover. I think the wrong team is favored in this matchup and UCF has a great chance to win straight-up. It all starts on defense. UCF's defense is 17th in efficiency and is anchored by 7'6 tall Tacko Fall, who helps his team ably protect the rim without putting the opponent on the line. TCU relies mostly on its interior for points and this reliance makes this matchup bad for them. They rely most on their big man--who is still over 6 inches shorter than Fall--Brodziansky, on offense. But he has really struggled against teams with length and height in the interior--at Baylor, for instance, he just had 6 points, and I expect a similar struggle here. While Baylor's big men are more athletic than those of UCF, I expect UCF to still be able to contain Brodziansky. TCU relies for most of its points inside with Brodziansky, but UCF has the #1 opposing 2 point %. But also, TCU will be unable to pose a significant threat to UCF's top-25 perimeter defense on the perimeter. They also lost a fairly important contributor in Fisher, who could have brought the necessary help to attack the sturdy UCF defense from behind the arc. UCF also has the advantage in guard play, led by BJ Taylor who has been averaging over 20 a game in the tournament. Despite his scoring prowess, he has been relatively cold from behind the arc, going just 2/9 from three in his past 2 games. However, he averages 35% from behind the arc on the season and this is why he has all the more upside coming into this game. TCU struggled to contain Iowa's versatile scorers, Bohannon and Jok, who combined for more than 40 points because they are able both to drive it to the rim and knock down three pointers. I think Williams and Taylor are capable of providing this kind of powerful and versatile attack for UCF against a rather non-intimidating half-court defense. UCF has the superior defense and more upside on offense. They should dominate the interior and match up well enough to contain TCU's highest-scorer. UCF has been enjoying success against teams from the major conferences and I think they continue to do so tomorrow night. Take UCF +2.5
Definitely concerned about Fisher's absence, as he and Robinson formed a very nice 1-2 point guard duo in the backcourt. But Dixon always shredded zones when he was coaching at Pitt, routinely torching the vaunted Cuse zone. Oddly enough TCU has seen very few zones this season (Baylor twice, but they play a lot of man and a very unique 1-1-3 zone). As you noted, UCF's interior defense is excellent, but the versatility of Brodianzky and the scorching-hot Kenrich Williams (double figures in 8 of his last 9 games) would give me pause as a prospective UCF backer. Both guys are capable of consistently knocking down long-range jumpers and driving to the rim. Among Big 12 players, only Jawun Evans and Esa Ahmad drew more fouls per 40 minutes than did Brodziansky. I expect both he and Williams will pull Tacko away from the rim, which breaks down the UCF interior defense.
At the other end of the floor, TCU's interior defense is quite solid, ranking 34/351 in % of shots blocked at the rim. Most of UCF's offense is created by B.J. Taylor penetration, often kicking out to Matt Williams, an absolutely deadly shooter. Presumably Dixon has watched enough film to realize that Williams is en fuego right now, and the TCU defenders will be careful not to overhelp on drives when Williams is spotted up at the three-point line. Of course, a shooter like Williams can go off at any moment (see Illinois State game), but TCU has a slew of long, rangy defenders to throw at him and contest his looks.
Really good game with two excellent coaches and a pair of programs that profile as Tournament teams next season. Good luck with the play, PJF.
0
Definitely concerned about Fisher's absence, as he and Robinson formed a very nice 1-2 point guard duo in the backcourt. But Dixon always shredded zones when he was coaching at Pitt, routinely torching the vaunted Cuse zone. Oddly enough TCU has seen very few zones this season (Baylor twice, but they play a lot of man and a very unique 1-1-3 zone). As you noted, UCF's interior defense is excellent, but the versatility of Brodianzky and the scorching-hot Kenrich Williams (double figures in 8 of his last 9 games) would give me pause as a prospective UCF backer. Both guys are capable of consistently knocking down long-range jumpers and driving to the rim. Among Big 12 players, only Jawun Evans and Esa Ahmad drew more fouls per 40 minutes than did Brodziansky. I expect both he and Williams will pull Tacko away from the rim, which breaks down the UCF interior defense.
At the other end of the floor, TCU's interior defense is quite solid, ranking 34/351 in % of shots blocked at the rim. Most of UCF's offense is created by B.J. Taylor penetration, often kicking out to Matt Williams, an absolutely deadly shooter. Presumably Dixon has watched enough film to realize that Williams is en fuego right now, and the TCU defenders will be careful not to overhelp on drives when Williams is spotted up at the three-point line. Of course, a shooter like Williams can go off at any moment (see Illinois State game), but TCU has a slew of long, rangy defenders to throw at him and contest his looks.
Really good game with two excellent coaches and a pair of programs that profile as Tournament teams next season. Good luck with the play, PJF.
Among the 32 conferences in Division I, the AAC ranked dead last in effective offensive field goal %. The league ranked 25th/32 in three-point % (34.5%) and 28th/32 in offensive efficiency. There were some downright awful offenses in the league this year. UCF played a crappy non-conference schedule (#331/351), and, prior to league play, only faced one (1) team that finished in the top 100 in offensive efficiency (Villanova). Eight of UCF's 12 non-conference opponents finished ranked #200 or lower in offensive efficiency.
I'm not suggesting the UCF defense isn't very good (it certainly is), but perhaps the numbers are a tad misleading here. TCU is the 2nd-best offensive team UCF has seen all season (behind nOVA), and this UCF defense isn't built to take advantage of an occasionally-sloppy TCU offense (UCF #342/351 in turnover %).
Just a few counter-points for your consideration.
0
One other point regarding UCF's defense:
Among the 32 conferences in Division I, the AAC ranked dead last in effective offensive field goal %. The league ranked 25th/32 in three-point % (34.5%) and 28th/32 in offensive efficiency. There were some downright awful offenses in the league this year. UCF played a crappy non-conference schedule (#331/351), and, prior to league play, only faced one (1) team that finished in the top 100 in offensive efficiency (Villanova). Eight of UCF's 12 non-conference opponents finished ranked #200 or lower in offensive efficiency.
I'm not suggesting the UCF defense isn't very good (it certainly is), but perhaps the numbers are a tad misleading here. TCU is the 2nd-best offensive team UCF has seen all season (behind nOVA), and this UCF defense isn't built to take advantage of an occasionally-sloppy TCU offense (UCF #342/351 in turnover %).
I think your point about SOS can work in some ways the other way around. For instance, you mention Williams' hot run, but TCU has lately only dealt with soft interior defenses. I think you also have to look at his struggles against defenses who teams have to mainly score against from behind the arc like Texas Tech (2 points from Williams) or at Baylor (10 points from Williams). UCF is one of those teams who protect the rim very well and rank highly in not fouling opponents. So I am sceptical of TCU players' ability to draw fouls. And without Fisher, I don't see them mounting much of a threat from behind the arc. You mention conference sos but were you not impressed with how ably UCF dealt with Colorado's and Illinois' weaponry? They have very talented and versatile athletes as well and UCF could keep them in check until the end of the game.
Regarding offense: If TCU doesn't overhelp on drives, I think Taylor will have a blast with a team that's 157th in opposing two point % i don't think TCU has the defensive skill to ably resolve the issue that Williams and Taylor pose. I think both are too dangerous inside and outside of the arc
0
I think your point about SOS can work in some ways the other way around. For instance, you mention Williams' hot run, but TCU has lately only dealt with soft interior defenses. I think you also have to look at his struggles against defenses who teams have to mainly score against from behind the arc like Texas Tech (2 points from Williams) or at Baylor (10 points from Williams). UCF is one of those teams who protect the rim very well and rank highly in not fouling opponents. So I am sceptical of TCU players' ability to draw fouls. And without Fisher, I don't see them mounting much of a threat from behind the arc. You mention conference sos but were you not impressed with how ably UCF dealt with Colorado's and Illinois' weaponry? They have very talented and versatile athletes as well and UCF could keep them in check until the end of the game.
Regarding offense: If TCU doesn't overhelp on drives, I think Taylor will have a blast with a team that's 157th in opposing two point % i don't think TCU has the defensive skill to ably resolve the issue that Williams and Taylor pose. I think both are too dangerous inside and outside of the arc
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.