Betmgm betting data

I’ll update as info on today’s games become available. Right now all I have is draft kings, and fanduel.  I can see the line movements at Caesar’s/betmgm but it’s no good until I can see handle. I’m hoping to see an in-house at prime sports.  If not. Well then this won’t get updated until tomorrow.

Betmgm

Most bet games tickets

1. Tennessee-Georgia

2. Texas-Arkansas

3. Kansas-BYU

Most bet teams tickets

1. Tennessee +9.5

2. Oregon -13.5

3. Texas -12.5

Most bet teams money

1. Tennessee +9.5

2. Arkansas +12.5

3. Kansas +2.5

Popular (+60% of bets) College Football Week 12 bets at #BetMGM

80% on Oregon -13.5

77% on Notre Dame -23.5

76% on Penn St -28.5

71% on Tennessee +9.5

71% on Louisville -20.5

69% on Tulane -7

63% on LSU -4

61% on K-State -7.5

60% on Boise St -14

60% on Ohio State -28.5

Bet-on

LIABILITY

1. Kansas +2.5

2. Charlotte +2.5

3. ODU +3

4. Cal -10

5. New Mexico +10

TICKETS

1. Tennessee +10

2. Kansas +2.5

3. Texas -11.5

4. Oregon -13.5

5. BYU -2.5

$$$

1. Kansas +2.5

2. Tennessee +10

3. ODU +3

4. Charlotte +2.5

5. UMass +14

Sharp plays

Sharp play on Arkansas +15.5 and +14.5," at TwinSpires

Sharp play Colorado -11 at superbook

@Weeds1079

Despite the public $, the Oregon spread isn’t moving. It’s not a strong Georgia team but I can’t stomach taking Tennessee getting double digits.

@FatCheeks

 I’ve read many book managers say that as of now a Georgia blowout will kill the majority of all teaser/parlay liability. 

Tennessee is a big liability at most books this weekend.  The public likes the dog in all ways.  Only superbook is reporting 2 way action and their line went 9 to 10.5 midweek. 

also, Oregon is all public money.  The reason that line is stuck is because respected money is staying away.  Betmgm,  twinspires, bet on all report no buyback.  Draftkings nudged a point midweek but I put little faith in their pros.  Northeastern pros bet at prime. 

well mystery of the line bounce on Georgia just got solved, literally 5 minutes after I hit send

Some sharp plays on College Football Week 12 odds at Caesar’s, per Joey Feazel:

Georgia -9.5/-10 vs. Tennessee early in the week, speculating on Nico Iamaleava status. Line peaked at -10.5, now back to -9.5.

Tulane -6/-6.5 at Navy

San Diego State +21 at UNLV

Temple pick/-1 vs. Florida Atlantic

@Weeds1079

 Thanks for posting. I wish I got in on Ark at a better number early this week. I like Tulane at the current number and hold my nose, I like Michigan St to bounce back. Also UTSA tonight.

Great info! Thanks 

For todays games (if want a specific handle like “ucla spread at circa” just ask”

betmgm

colo st/ wyoming spread +10.5 to +9

50% tickets and 73% dollars on Wyoming 

68% tickets on over, 60% dollars on under (45.5 currently)

circa

63% tickets and 66% money on colorado but falling (circa/most books follows the crowd)

75% tickets on over and 79% on under (47)

draftkings

Colorado taking 68% of bets and 55% money

78% of tickets and 72% handle on over

early bettors ran over from 46.5(release) to 48.5 early week. Line flunctuated last few days.  Today it’s been all buy back to under.

Line was released at 10.5 and stayed at 10.5 or 10 since Tuesday.  It’s been on a steady fall since.

So nothing too clear cut other than low ticket to high handle on dog. Line movement looks legit. O/U I tend to follow betmgm since their house actually dictates a line move.

North Texas next please no comments or questions until I finish the next one

North Texas/utsa. Line comes out UNT -2 and now sits -1.5 utsa. total 68.5 and now 72.5

Circa 

71% bets on utsa but 57% handle on unt 

all (75/98) Moneyline on utsa

o/u data looks bunk so no factor

Betmgm

70% of tickets and 67% handle on utsa 

62%/61% on utsa ml

55% bets and 70% on over

draft kings

59% tickets and 54% handle on UNT

54% tickets on unt, but 56% on utsa ml

60% tickets on under, 73% on over

thoughts.  The steam on the side is just that steam.  Everywhere I turned you could see money on utsa. Not very comforting that nobody bought back.  The side smells public, it has a public handle.  Nothing wrong, public gets it right. So the UNT folks are cool with -2 and UTSA -1.5 is fine.  The over is more defined and was more professionally played. 

best of luck. As always I’m not telling you what to do. The house doesn’t always win. Lastly I have not one iota of feeling or thought on these games. I’m just puking out info I’ve gathered. 
weeds

@Weeds1079

Couldn’t ticket, $, handle, etc. and especially liability be completely different at the various big sports books? Also, offshore or  betonline compared to US. Seems like you would have to compare this data for the largest ten sports books than compare the numbers… if not I’d be bias as hell. 

@MrFreedo

 Absolutely. But draftkings and other shops won’t move lines until someone like prime/betmgm does.  Even when the handle is out of control they will just let it stick.

most of the handle, or sharp are plays in Vegas or at a sharp book. Since those wagers actually dictate a movement the majority of the time.

you have every right to pessimistic. I’m just trying to help. You are 100% correct though different books have different needs.  For instance, the over 216 has been getting squashed in the Knicks game online and digitally but it’s handle skews under in the Vegas casinos.  So that’s why it’s still 216, but meanwhile DK, fanduel, betmgm are holding it as a huge liability

Again, I didn’t come to pee in your forum. I can keep this stuff to myself and save 30 minutes a day typing. 

Any info for nfl this weekend per mgm? Very useful information, thanks!