Okay, I know this is the past but historically this game is low scoring at S. Carolina. UGA hasn't scored over 20 at SCar in TWENTY YEARS. And to get even crazier, UGA has had a passing touchdown at SC in TEN years. Again, I know it's the past but be weary here.
I personally think this game will be very tight through out. The A&M outcome was a product of A&M's system and great QB play. SC tried to play man all game with freshman DB's in order to try get a pass rush on Kenny Hill. Problem here is that A&M's OL may be one of the best in the country. Hill had all day to through, and Sumlin's system will torch a one-diminsional defense.
Now from a UGA standpoint, our OL is NOT A&M's. Just an average group. Yes, our back field is incredible, but our QB isn't tested. I'm personally not sold on him and think he may struggle. If he does, I expect SC to load the box, which will make it tough on us.
Our D is much improved purely on scheme under our new D coordinator, but our secondary is still mediocre. Expect SC to get their fair share.
I expect about a 27-21 type of game in favor of the Dawgs. But that's just my two cents. Good luck
0
UGA Homer here giving some input on the O60....
Okay, I know this is the past but historically this game is low scoring at S. Carolina. UGA hasn't scored over 20 at SCar in TWENTY YEARS. And to get even crazier, UGA has had a passing touchdown at SC in TEN years. Again, I know it's the past but be weary here.
I personally think this game will be very tight through out. The A&M outcome was a product of A&M's system and great QB play. SC tried to play man all game with freshman DB's in order to try get a pass rush on Kenny Hill. Problem here is that A&M's OL may be one of the best in the country. Hill had all day to through, and Sumlin's system will torch a one-diminsional defense.
Now from a UGA standpoint, our OL is NOT A&M's. Just an average group. Yes, our back field is incredible, but our QB isn't tested. I'm personally not sold on him and think he may struggle. If he does, I expect SC to load the box, which will make it tough on us.
Our D is much improved purely on scheme under our new D coordinator, but our secondary is still mediocre. Expect SC to get their fair share.
I expect about a 27-21 type of game in favor of the Dawgs. But that's just my two cents. Good luck
In the past Purdue has gotten up for this game, but I just see too much of a talent discrepancy for them to keep up this time. Golson is back and they look pretty solid so far. Purdue on the other hand is having trouble with middle-tier (at best) MAC schools.
0
I like ND this week.
In the past Purdue has gotten up for this game, but I just see too much of a talent discrepancy for them to keep up this time. Golson is back and they look pretty solid so far. Purdue on the other hand is having trouble with middle-tier (at best) MAC schools.
Letdown spot for ND, but Purdue is down right awful. ND might be able to sleep walk and cover this game. But 28 is a lot after a win like that
Sure could be, but obviously I am banking against that. Last year they were AT Michigan (lost) and AT Purdue (won only by 7) so I am hoping that was because A) they just weren't as good and B) because of the travel. Granted, travel is not that long, but still back to back road games. Two years ago (with Golson) they won at home vs. Michigan (by 6) then blew out the U the following week (at Soldier Field I believe).
How's tricks Wheaty?
0
Quote Originally Posted by wheaty :
Letdown spot for ND, but Purdue is down right awful. ND might be able to sleep walk and cover this game. But 28 is a lot after a win like that
Sure could be, but obviously I am banking against that. Last year they were AT Michigan (lost) and AT Purdue (won only by 7) so I am hoping that was because A) they just weren't as good and B) because of the travel. Granted, travel is not that long, but still back to back road games. Two years ago (with Golson) they won at home vs. Michigan (by 6) then blew out the U the following week (at Soldier Field I believe).
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.