Buckeyes lost @ home against a 6-win team and now has to beat Alabama with a third string quarterback!...TCU much more deserving...follow the money in the end!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Buckeyes lost @ home against a 6-win team and now has to beat Alabama with a third string quarterback!...TCU much more deserving...follow the money in the end!
That TCU at Baylor game was 2 months ago. The one in which the refs f u c led the garbage out of the frogs on 2 different occasions in the last 2 min, since then it was clear who the better team was. If you feel that head to head is the end all be all than I understand why you say Baylor 100 percent had to be ahead of frogs. I was under the impression that you take the whole regular season into consideration and when the resumes are close you pick who you feel the better team is. Not a head to head in early October which was as close of a game on the road as humanly possible, especially when Baylor loses by 2 TDs after that game to wvu. That's just my humble opinion, and I do get why a lot of folks had the bears ahead of the frogs cus of head to head. Either way it was a dream scenario for the committee that wisky didn't bother to show up and they could coward out of the big 12 debate and pick the big 10 over them, which still seems like a joke when you say it out loud.
0
That TCU at Baylor game was 2 months ago. The one in which the refs f u c led the garbage out of the frogs on 2 different occasions in the last 2 min, since then it was clear who the better team was. If you feel that head to head is the end all be all than I understand why you say Baylor 100 percent had to be ahead of frogs. I was under the impression that you take the whole regular season into consideration and when the resumes are close you pick who you feel the better team is. Not a head to head in early October which was as close of a game on the road as humanly possible, especially when Baylor loses by 2 TDs after that game to wvu. That's just my humble opinion, and I do get why a lot of folks had the bears ahead of the frogs cus of head to head. Either way it was a dream scenario for the committee that wisky didn't bother to show up and they could coward out of the big 12 debate and pick the big 10 over them, which still seems like a joke when you say it out loud.
From all the so called College football experts pretty much said if Baylor beats K St then Baylor would move ahead of TCU, this committee moves teams depending on who they played that day.
0
From all the so called College football experts pretty much said if Baylor beats K St then Baylor would move ahead of TCU, this committee moves teams depending on who they played that day.
After Alabama buries the Buckeyes, people can form their opinions about who "should have been in". Some think Ohio State got in because of their name......and likewise Baylor and TCU didn't get in because of their perceived place in the history of college football. Others think that it's a conference championship or strength of schedule thing. Fact is, the teams that were picked were selected based solely on the collective opinion of a committee. Politics involved? Foolish to think otherwise.
0
After Alabama buries the Buckeyes, people can form their opinions about who "should have been in". Some think Ohio State got in because of their name......and likewise Baylor and TCU didn't get in because of their perceived place in the history of college football. Others think that it's a conference championship or strength of schedule thing. Fact is, the teams that were picked were selected based solely on the collective opinion of a committee. Politics involved? Foolish to think otherwise.
And if you think anyone from the big 10 Period deserves to get in,you need more help
So if Bama was in the Big 10 they wouldnt deserve to be in.....? Just cause the conference around you isnt that great, doesnt mean you have to punish a great team thats in it....
0
Quote Originally Posted by ceveche88:
And if you think anyone from the big 10 Period deserves to get in,you need more help
So if Bama was in the Big 10 they wouldnt deserve to be in.....? Just cause the conference around you isnt that great, doesnt mean you have to punish a great team thats in it....
Buckeyes lost @ home against a 6-win team and now has to beat Alabama with a third string quarterback!...TCU much more deserving...follow the money in the end!
Where Portsmouth!!!!!!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by 1betting:
Buckeyes lost @ home against a 6-win team and now has to beat Alabama with a third string quarterback!...TCU much more deserving...follow the money in the end!
After Alabama buries the Buckeyes, people can form their opinions about who "should have been in". Some think Ohio State got in because of their name......and likewise Baylor and TCU didn't get in because of their perceived place in the history of college football. Others think that it's a conference championship or strength of schedule thing. Fact is, the teams that were picked were selected based solely on the collective opinion of a committee. Politics involved? Foolish to think otherwise.
How much money have you won on Alabama this year!!!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by soonboomer:
After Alabama buries the Buckeyes, people can form their opinions about who "should have been in". Some think Ohio State got in because of their name......and likewise Baylor and TCU didn't get in because of their perceived place in the history of college football. Others think that it's a conference championship or strength of schedule thing. Fact is, the teams that were picked were selected based solely on the collective opinion of a committee. Politics involved? Foolish to think otherwise.
How much money have you won on Alabama this year!!!!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.