My book is 1-0, after telling us that NO / Tampa 2H would go under.
Tonight they are telling us that either Cincinnati or Iowa will not cover. How do we know this, well it is listed in the daily specials odds boost (both to cover -3.5). I have been watching these odds boosts closely as they are fun to bet; however, only rarely come in.
So, which is it? Well, we have a good Iowa team that generally owns Minn who is down this year. Then we have the number 7 team in the country laying a monster 4 touchdowns and my book backs this down to -3.5 for the special.....hymmmm.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
My book is 1-0, after telling us that NO / Tampa 2H would go under.
Tonight they are telling us that either Cincinnati or Iowa will not cover. How do we know this, well it is listed in the daily specials odds boost (both to cover -3.5). I have been watching these odds boosts closely as they are fun to bet; however, only rarely come in.
So, which is it? Well, we have a good Iowa team that generally owns Minn who is down this year. Then we have the number 7 team in the country laying a monster 4 touchdowns and my book backs this down to -3.5 for the special.....hymmmm.
Yeah those odds boosts are the biggest traps. When it's two teams, 2 horses, anything, that means one of them is getting beat most of the time.
Then again, it's not that easy to go 2-0 with any 2 bets, sometimes it seems that way when you run good but realistically it's better to aim for 6 out of every 10 bets rather than think you'll hit these 2 teamers.
And it's Iowa who gets beat btw
0
Yeah those odds boosts are the biggest traps. When it's two teams, 2 horses, anything, that means one of them is getting beat most of the time.
Then again, it's not that easy to go 2-0 with any 2 bets, sometimes it seems that way when you run good but realistically it's better to aim for 6 out of every 10 bets rather than think you'll hit these 2 teamers.
My lean as well. They want you to think you're getting a gift with only needing Cin -3.5, but drop the hammer with Iowa (which sucks as I have them -3).
@ifyasmelllalala
I'm less intrigued by the odds themselves but that they are giving +25%. However, I think they ended at +150 in total.
0
@YanksHeels1
My lean as well. They want you to think you're getting a gift with only needing Cin -3.5, but drop the hammer with Iowa (which sucks as I have them -3).
@ifyasmelllalala
I'm less intrigued by the odds themselves but that they are giving +25%. However, I think they ended at +150 in total.
I think it's Cinn not covering, the game is going to be on ESPN 2 and underdogs tend to wake up on televised games as to not embarrass themselves, this also makes me like the over in that game as well. Gl
0
I think it's Cinn not covering, the game is going to be on ESPN 2 and underdogs tend to wake up on televised games as to not embarrass themselves, this also makes me like the over in that game as well. Gl
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.