Made a horrible pick on LSU 
Zebras cost Utah an outright win, but at least they covered. Zebras also figured prominently in Texas Tech's loss! How the hell do you miss that blatant facemask? If they're gonna review targeting plays then they should certainly review facemask plays.
All said and done I had a +1.3 unit day. Better than losing. End of rant on the shitty officiating.
@Boisestateand8
The MAC is about big lines and big favorites covering. Big dogs suffer at a big loss ROI. The bottom of the MAC teams can not play. I am going to post both Toledo and N. ILL as small plays in my thread. Action plays sort to speak with strong data to support them. These are local teams that don't make much money so it makes sense.
No data sorting on the MAC lines less than -14 or higher is 165-135 ATS 55% its steady long term. The lines dictate the cover because the dog teams can't hang
@spottie2935
Ball St. is the only dog I would consider in the MAC this week. Cardinals are just 3-6 SU but they're playing hard and are 4-0 ATS as a conference dog. Plus, the Bulls aren't that good. I liked this game at +5, but now it's up to 6'. If it hits 7 or better I might have to play it.
Akron and Kent St. are both unplayable, as are most teams that are playing out the string. I'm primarily a dog bettor, but only if that particular dog has any teeth. For me, Ball St. is a dog with some teeth.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
