All Forums | College Football

Phil Steele's top 10

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1268
Posts: 25
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 6471
Posted: #1
1.  Bama
2. Ok
3.  Boise
4.  Oregon
5.  Va Tech
6.  ND
7.  LSU
8.  Tex A & M
9.  Georgia
10.  FSU
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 6471
Posted: #2
11.  TCU
12.  Neb
13.  ARK
14.  South Car
15.  Ohio St
16.  Stanford
17.  USC
18.  Texas
19.  Ok St
20.  Southern Miss
21.  Houston
22.  ASU
23.  Wiscy
24.  Penn St
25.  USF
26.  UNC
27.  Pitt
28.  Mich St
29.  BYU
30  Air Force
31.  Miami FL
32.  UF
33.  West Va
34.  Ohio
35.  Tulsa
36.  Miss St
37.  Clemson
38.  Mizzou
39.  Illinois
40.  NC ST
41   Mich
42.  Iowa
43.  Cinci
44.  San Diego St
45.  SMU
46.  UCLA
47.  UCF
48.  Cal
49.  Texas Tech
50.  Troy
51.  Nevada
52.  Toledo
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 6471
Posted: #3
Looking forward to OK at FSU on Sept 17th!!!!!   I will be there and that game is HUGE!!!!


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3689
Posted: #4
6.  ND
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 14372
Posted: #5
ND has a lot to prove that's for sure. 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 19693
Posted: #6
Didn't Boise lose Kellen Moore, along with two wideouts to the NFL?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3689
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by The Hawk:

Didn't Boise lose Kellen Moore, along with two wideouts to the NFL?


Moore is still there..
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 19693
Posted: #8
Damn good qb. But they did lose some damn good wrs, right?
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 19693
Posted: #9
Buckeyes @15 with Vest? Out of Top 30 if they go sniffing around Pryors garage..................
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 2642
Posted: #10
Kellen is good, but Keenum will have a better year. Biased? perhaps. Right? of course...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 2642
Posted: #11
Mainly because Keenum has better weapons at his disposal.  I know my coogs and we always are at our best when flying under the radar.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 5310
Posted: #12
Miss St at 36? That's an injustice. They should be much much higher.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 19693
Posted: #13

Michigan State @28? Never the glamour pick, but they wound up at #7, before their bowl game, I mean. Started about 28th last year.

I don't see Miss. St. @36, either. I think the SEC is going to be a crapshoot this year. I could see 7 teams between 10-20. I mean, a lot of 2-loss teams, including LSU.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3689
Posted: #14
Yea, Boise lost both Pettis and Young..

MSU should still be top 20 with the offensive threats they have- wouldn't surprise me to see them win the B10

If Pryor is gone, OSU loses at least 3-4 games

Miss State should be a top 25 program- gotta look at the schedule.. BUT they need to learn to throw it..

And Keenum is god
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 66896
Posted: #15

Putting Notre Dame in your Top 10 sells alot of Magazines

Steele has put them in his suprise teams for like 10+ years now

 

Don't always agree with him .... But he PUTS OUT THE BEST PUBLICATION ON THE PLANET

BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3689
Posted: #16
Not sure Oregon at #4 either.. have to do some research, but didn't they lose like their entire DL and 4 OL?

That's going to hurt, don't care how good your skill players are..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 2194
Posted: #17
Notre Dame at #6?????Ok State at #19 is a joke, should be in the top 10 with that offense and a deeper defense...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 2642
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by POISON66:

Notre Dame at #6?????Ok State at #19 is a joke, should be in the top 10 with that offense and a deeper defense...


Okie st losing Holgorsen to WV will hurt their offense. When Holgorsen left UH for Okie St the offense was not the same. He is a offensive genius.  Okie St's offense wont be as productive, i can promise you that.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 1891
Posted: #19

Quote Originally Posted by D_Unit:

Kellen is good, but Keenum will have a better year. Biased? perhaps. Right? of course...

Why are people on Keenum's nuts this year?  I liked what he was doing in 2009 until that 6 INT bowl game vs Air Force.  The Following year he threw 5 more INT in 2 1/2 games to go with his 5 TD's all versus D II Texas State.

IMO Bryce is the focal point on offense for Houston and Keenum needs to be better at throwing picks.  Not saying Houston Doesn't win Conf USA and Keenum is come back POY,  but I will take Kellen Moore over Keenum anyday....Moore even made the play that SHOULDA set up the game winning FG vs Nevada. The guy is money.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 940
Posted: #20
Notre Dame needs to lose its luster and fast. Georgia, Texas A & M and Boise State in the top 10? Surprising but maybe I have to see why he would publish that. There must be some solid reasons. I know he does not have one for Notre Dame other than national popularity benfits for himself
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 19693
Posted: #21
I wonder how his "projections" helped him bet when Tulsa beat ND @HOME....................
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 2194
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by D_Unit:



Okie st losing Holgorsen to WV will hurt their offense. When Holgorsen left UH for Okie St the offense was not the same. He is a offensive genius.  Okie St's offense wont be as productive, i can promise you that.
They'll be fine, the're still running the same offense, just different OC in Todd Monken...
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 11607
Posted: #23
shouldnt utah be listed somewhere in the top 52?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3689
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by POISON66:

They'll be fine, the're still running the same offense, just different OC in Todd Monken...


Word is though the new OC has never run this type of O before and Weeden has been teaching the O to him..

No way they will be as productive as LY with Holgorsen..
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 2642
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by SatNightFever05:



Word is though the new OC has never run this type of O before and Weeden has been teaching the O to him..

No way they will be as productive as LY with Holgorsen..


We at UH also heard the ole story " oh, nothing will change we are running the same offense."  Uh wrong, the OC calls the correct plays in game situations. Also DH was known for his intense practices.  Wont be the same.
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.