wahoo - I understand best records and tendencies should be factored in, but isn't this a new team? the noles have a new more aggressive DC going against a marginal QB in Savage, It appears that WR Street is their only quality playmaker. FSU is superior at every single position. In addition, Pitt's D Ratings seems a bit inflated playing a marginal big east schedule. Finally, Florida State has a week off after this game prior to a home game against marginal and rebuilding Nevada. So no lookahead. In addition, though FSU was 0-5 ATS as a 35road favorite last year, they were 5-2 as a road favorite in 2010 and 2011. Pitt did impress with a close loss to N Dame last year. I think that scare will motivate FSU to execute, to put it out of reach early, and with the off week, keep executing and getting Winston reps.
Florida State 35
Pitt 10
wahoo - I understand best records and tendencies should be factored in, but isn't this a new team? the noles have a new more aggressive DC going against a marginal QB in Savage, It appears that WR Street is their only quality playmaker. FSU is superior at every single position. In addition, Pitt's D Ratings seems a bit inflated playing a marginal big east schedule. Finally, Florida State has a week off after this game prior to a home game against marginal and rebuilding Nevada. So no lookahead. In addition, though FSU was 0-5 ATS as a 35road favorite last year, they were 5-2 as a road favorite in 2010 and 2011. Pitt did impress with a close loss to N Dame last year. I think that scare will motivate FSU to execute, to put it out of reach early, and with the off week, keep executing and getting Winston reps.
Florida State 35
Pitt 10
Sounds right to me.
Sounds right to me.
I hadn't noticed that.
Is COVERS really responsible for Wahoo's cat now being nicotine free?
The underdog has covered in 9 of the last 11 week 1 monday night college games. They have also won 8 of those games SU. The only favorites that covered during that time was Maryland -4 in '11 against the 'Canes (Terps where losing with less than 2 minutes left before kicking a late FG and then returning an Int. for a TD with just 39 seconds remaining), and Texas Tech - 8.5 destroyed SMU in '07 49-9.
I hadn't noticed that.
Is COVERS really responsible for Wahoo's cat now being nicotine free?
The underdog has covered in 9 of the last 11 week 1 monday night college games. They have also won 8 of those games SU. The only favorites that covered during that time was Maryland -4 in '11 against the 'Canes (Terps where losing with less than 2 minutes left before kicking a late FG and then returning an Int. for a TD with just 39 seconds remaining), and Texas Tech - 8.5 destroyed SMU in '07 49-9.
I hadn't noticed that.
Is COVERS really responsible for Wahoo's cat now being nicotine free?
The underdog has covered in 9 of the last 11 week 1 monday night college games. They have also won 8 of those games SU. The only favorites that covered during that time was Maryland -4 in '11 against the 'Canes (Terps where losing with less than 2 minutes left before kicking a late FG and then returning an Int. for a TD with just 39 seconds remaining), and Texas Tech - 8.5 destroyed SMU in '07 49-9.
So 29, a historical perspective is important to consider, but what does that have to do with this matchup. Was a logical explanation for the dog cover in all those cases. what do you think about this FSU v Pitt matchup. I think you have to consider the respective matchup prima facie and see if the logic of the Monday trend regarding dogs holds water.
I hadn't noticed that.
Is COVERS really responsible for Wahoo's cat now being nicotine free?
The underdog has covered in 9 of the last 11 week 1 monday night college games. They have also won 8 of those games SU. The only favorites that covered during that time was Maryland -4 in '11 against the 'Canes (Terps where losing with less than 2 minutes left before kicking a late FG and then returning an Int. for a TD with just 39 seconds remaining), and Texas Tech - 8.5 destroyed SMU in '07 49-9.
So 29, a historical perspective is important to consider, but what does that have to do with this matchup. Was a logical explanation for the dog cover in all those cases. what do you think about this FSU v Pitt matchup. I think you have to consider the respective matchup prima facie and see if the logic of the Monday trend regarding dogs holds water.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.