I don't think Penix will have any problem passing on Michigan. The Huskies have a much better o-line than Alabama and 3 top tier WRs. If Alabama can put up 20 on Michigan with a sub-par offensive line I see no reason why Washington can't put up 30.
Washington to win by 1-13 currently pays out at +300... the Washington Huskies have won 10 games in a row by 10 pts or less. They only blow out bad teams. My best guess is this game will be decided by 7 points or less late in the 4th with a total score in the low 60s.
Notable comparison of WAS/ALA qb's:
Penix has only been sacked 10x all year
Milroe has been sacked 38x
Aside from the numbers being horendous for Milroe he was sacked in all but 1 game played. So even bad teams had no problem getting to the qb at will. I was surprised to read that the Alabama center had issues all year snapping the ball... why was he not replaced with someone else???
*If Alabama had an above average center that wasn't mishandling almost every snap Alabama would have beaten Michigan in the Rose Bowl... that guy single handedly killed a bunch of their drives.
1
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I don't think Penix will have any problem passing on Michigan. The Huskies have a much better o-line than Alabama and 3 top tier WRs. If Alabama can put up 20 on Michigan with a sub-par offensive line I see no reason why Washington can't put up 30.
Washington to win by 1-13 currently pays out at +300... the Washington Huskies have won 10 games in a row by 10 pts or less. They only blow out bad teams. My best guess is this game will be decided by 7 points or less late in the 4th with a total score in the low 60s.
Notable comparison of WAS/ALA qb's:
Penix has only been sacked 10x all year
Milroe has been sacked 38x
Aside from the numbers being horendous for Milroe he was sacked in all but 1 game played. So even bad teams had no problem getting to the qb at will. I was surprised to read that the Alabama center had issues all year snapping the ball... why was he not replaced with someone else???
*If Alabama had an above average center that wasn't mishandling almost every snap Alabama would have beaten Michigan in the Rose Bowl... that guy single handedly killed a bunch of their drives.
I don't think Penix will have any problem passing on Michigan. The Huskies have a much better o-line than Alabama and 3 top tier WRs. If Alabama can put up 20 on Michigan with a sub-par offensive line I see no reason why Washington can't put up 30. Washington to win by 1-13 currently pays out at +300... the Washington Huskies have won 10 games in a row by 10 pts or less. They only blow out bad teams. My best guess is this game will be decided by 7 points or less late in the 4th with a total score in the low 60s. Notable comparison of WAS/ALA qb's: Penix has only been sacked 10x all year Milroe has been sacked 38x Aside from the numbers being horendous for Milroe he was sacked in all but 1 game played. So even bad teams had no problem getting to the qb at will. I was surprised to read that the Alabama center had issues all year snapping the ball... why was he not replaced with someone else??? *If Alabama had an above average center that wasn't mishandling almost every snap Alabama would have beaten Michigan in the Rose Bowl... that guy single handedly killed a bunch of their drives.
I agree with most your points. I don’t know if this game gets to low 60’s though. Michigan runs the ball a lot and Washington loves to run the clock down between plays. Washington’s pace seems fast because they rail off such explosive plays, but notice how much time they took off the clock in the third and fourth quarter. A lot of that was just letting the play clock run down under 10 seconds.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Pablo989:
I don't think Penix will have any problem passing on Michigan. The Huskies have a much better o-line than Alabama and 3 top tier WRs. If Alabama can put up 20 on Michigan with a sub-par offensive line I see no reason why Washington can't put up 30. Washington to win by 1-13 currently pays out at +300... the Washington Huskies have won 10 games in a row by 10 pts or less. They only blow out bad teams. My best guess is this game will be decided by 7 points or less late in the 4th with a total score in the low 60s. Notable comparison of WAS/ALA qb's: Penix has only been sacked 10x all year Milroe has been sacked 38x Aside from the numbers being horendous for Milroe he was sacked in all but 1 game played. So even bad teams had no problem getting to the qb at will. I was surprised to read that the Alabama center had issues all year snapping the ball... why was he not replaced with someone else??? *If Alabama had an above average center that wasn't mishandling almost every snap Alabama would have beaten Michigan in the Rose Bowl... that guy single handedly killed a bunch of their drives.
I agree with most your points. I don’t know if this game gets to low 60’s though. Michigan runs the ball a lot and Washington loves to run the clock down between plays. Washington’s pace seems fast because they rail off such explosive plays, but notice how much time they took off the clock in the third and fourth quarter. A lot of that was just letting the play clock run down under 10 seconds.
Quote Originally Posted by Pablo989: I don't think Penix will have any problem passing on Michigan. The Huskies have a much better o-line than Alabama and 3 top tier WRs. If Alabama can put up 20 on Michigan with a sub-par offensive line I see no reason why Washington can't put up 30. Washington to win by 1-13 currently pays out at +300... the Washington Huskies have won 10 games in a row by 10 pts or less. They only blow out bad teams. My best guess is this game will be decided by 7 points or less late in the 4th with a total score in the low 60s. Notable comparison of WAS/ALA qb's: Penix has only been sacked 10x all year Milroe has been sacked 38x Aside from the numbers being horendous for Milroe he was sacked in all but 1 game played. So even bad teams had no problem getting to the qb at will. I was surprised to read that the Alabama center had issues all year snapping the ball... why was he not replaced with someone else??? *If Alabama had an above average center that wasn't mishandling almost every snap Alabama would have beaten Michigan in the Rose Bowl... that guy single handedly killed a bunch of their drives. I agree with most your points. I don’t know if this game gets to low 60’s though. Michigan runs the ball a lot and Washington loves to run the clock down between plays. Washington’s pace seems fast because they rail off such explosive plays, but notice how much time they took off the clock in the third and fourth quarter. A lot of that was just letting the play clock run down under 10 seconds.
That is just smart football. Running plays is tiresome. You would think if your guys are better, you want them to have as much rest as possible in between plays.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Cupcaking:
Quote Originally Posted by Pablo989: I don't think Penix will have any problem passing on Michigan. The Huskies have a much better o-line than Alabama and 3 top tier WRs. If Alabama can put up 20 on Michigan with a sub-par offensive line I see no reason why Washington can't put up 30. Washington to win by 1-13 currently pays out at +300... the Washington Huskies have won 10 games in a row by 10 pts or less. They only blow out bad teams. My best guess is this game will be decided by 7 points or less late in the 4th with a total score in the low 60s. Notable comparison of WAS/ALA qb's: Penix has only been sacked 10x all year Milroe has been sacked 38x Aside from the numbers being horendous for Milroe he was sacked in all but 1 game played. So even bad teams had no problem getting to the qb at will. I was surprised to read that the Alabama center had issues all year snapping the ball... why was he not replaced with someone else??? *If Alabama had an above average center that wasn't mishandling almost every snap Alabama would have beaten Michigan in the Rose Bowl... that guy single handedly killed a bunch of their drives. I agree with most your points. I don’t know if this game gets to low 60’s though. Michigan runs the ball a lot and Washington loves to run the clock down between plays. Washington’s pace seems fast because they rail off such explosive plays, but notice how much time they took off the clock in the third and fourth quarter. A lot of that was just letting the play clock run down under 10 seconds.
That is just smart football. Running plays is tiresome. You would think if your guys are better, you want them to have as much rest as possible in between plays.
Quote Originally Posted by Cupcaking: Quote Originally Posted by Pablo989: I don't think Penix will have any problem passing on Michigan. The Huskies have a much better o-line than Alabama and 3 top tier WRs. If Alabama can put up 20 on Michigan with a sub-par offensive line I see no reason why Washington can't put up 30. Washington to win by 1-13 currently pays out at +300... the Washington Huskies have won 10 games in a row by 10 pts or less. They only blow out bad teams. My best guess is this game will be decided by 7 points or less late in the 4th with a total score in the low 60s. Notable comparison of WAS/ALA qb's: Penix has only been sacked 10x all year Milroe has been sacked 38x Aside from the numbers being horendous for Milroe he was sacked in all but 1 game played. So even bad teams had no problem getting to the qb at will. I was surprised to read that the Alabama center had issues all year snapping the ball... why was he not replaced with someone else??? *If Alabama had an above average center that wasn't mishandling almost every snap Alabama would have beaten Michigan in the Rose Bowl... that guy single handedly killed a bunch of their drives. I agree with most your points. I don’t know if this game gets to low 60’s though. Michigan runs the ball a lot and Washington loves to run the clock down between plays. Washington’s pace seems fast because they rail off such explosive plays, but notice how much time they took off the clock in the third and fourth quarter. A lot of that was just letting the play clock run down under 10 seconds. That is just smart football. Running plays is tiresome. You would think if your guys are better, you want them to have as much rest as possible in between plays.
Oh, definitely not arguing if it’s smart or not smart. I’m just saying I question if they can clear 60 points because of both teams tendencies to waste clock. The original poster was saying they believe this game will be in the 60’s, I’m counter arguing that.
0
Quote Originally Posted by NONEED4LUCK:
Quote Originally Posted by Cupcaking: Quote Originally Posted by Pablo989: I don't think Penix will have any problem passing on Michigan. The Huskies have a much better o-line than Alabama and 3 top tier WRs. If Alabama can put up 20 on Michigan with a sub-par offensive line I see no reason why Washington can't put up 30. Washington to win by 1-13 currently pays out at +300... the Washington Huskies have won 10 games in a row by 10 pts or less. They only blow out bad teams. My best guess is this game will be decided by 7 points or less late in the 4th with a total score in the low 60s. Notable comparison of WAS/ALA qb's: Penix has only been sacked 10x all year Milroe has been sacked 38x Aside from the numbers being horendous for Milroe he was sacked in all but 1 game played. So even bad teams had no problem getting to the qb at will. I was surprised to read that the Alabama center had issues all year snapping the ball... why was he not replaced with someone else??? *If Alabama had an above average center that wasn't mishandling almost every snap Alabama would have beaten Michigan in the Rose Bowl... that guy single handedly killed a bunch of their drives. I agree with most your points. I don’t know if this game gets to low 60’s though. Michigan runs the ball a lot and Washington loves to run the clock down between plays. Washington’s pace seems fast because they rail off such explosive plays, but notice how much time they took off the clock in the third and fourth quarter. A lot of that was just letting the play clock run down under 10 seconds. That is just smart football. Running plays is tiresome. You would think if your guys are better, you want them to have as much rest as possible in between plays.
Oh, definitely not arguing if it’s smart or not smart. I’m just saying I question if they can clear 60 points because of both teams tendencies to waste clock. The original poster was saying they believe this game will be in the 60’s, I’m counter arguing that.
My only argument would be, if Michigan runs the ball 30+ times do you think Washington can stop the run? Texas averaged 6.4 yards per carry and Michigan could run all day.
0
My only argument would be, if Michigan runs the ball 30+ times do you think Washington can stop the run? Texas averaged 6.4 yards per carry and Michigan could run all day.
Good running teams average 5+ yards per rush against Washington so the Huskies will need some key stops/turnovers to keep Michigan below 30pts. If Michigan somehow goes down 2 scores they will be forced to pass which they won't want to do against this opponent.
I expect Michigan to have a hard time stopping the Huskies trio of elite WRs and their TE. I expect Washington to have an equally hard time stopping Michigan's run game.
0
Good running teams average 5+ yards per rush against Washington so the Huskies will need some key stops/turnovers to keep Michigan below 30pts. If Michigan somehow goes down 2 scores they will be forced to pass which they won't want to do against this opponent.
I expect Michigan to have a hard time stopping the Huskies trio of elite WRs and their TE. I expect Washington to have an equally hard time stopping Michigan's run game.
Washington will need to score 30+pts themselves to win which I believe is very doable. Huskies to score 30+pts currently pays out at +145. They will also need some luck on their side.
If the game is close it favors Washington, if the game is a blowout it favors Michigan.
Washington 34
Michigan 30
Washington 27
Michigan 41
This is by far the best QB/WRs combo Michigan has faced all year. Ohio State had by far the best wr in college this year with Marvin Harrison but that team had a bad qb throwing him the ball.
A lot of Tom Brady / Michael Penix comparisons floating around. I can definitely see it.
0
Washington will need to score 30+pts themselves to win which I believe is very doable. Huskies to score 30+pts currently pays out at +145. They will also need some luck on their side.
If the game is close it favors Washington, if the game is a blowout it favors Michigan.
Washington 34
Michigan 30
Washington 27
Michigan 41
This is by far the best QB/WRs combo Michigan has faced all year. Ohio State had by far the best wr in college this year with Marvin Harrison but that team had a bad qb throwing him the ball.
A lot of Tom Brady / Michael Penix comparisons floating around. I can definitely see it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.