Why do we use instant replay???

Question

The ball clearly passes the line and yet the day no TD lol

CaliPicks · Answer

The ball clearly passes the line and yet the day no TD lol

CaliPicks · Answer

They say

wiggins · Answer

makes no sense you wont find one person who thought that wasnt a td

nyjrkm06 · Answer

That&#x27;s a fishy game right now

Gusfgz · Answer

It was a TD, the instant replay is useless.

jbkizzle · Answer

it was a touchdown. but clearly not enough evidence to overturn, and this is coming from a guy with money on LSU to cover.

unfortunately, they don't look at multiple angles simultaneously to determine where the knee versus ball is. they only look at one camera shot. and no single camera shot was conclusive.

common sense clearly indicates it was a touchdown. but not enough evidence to overturn. sad face.

Buzz44 · Answer

Bullcrap I hope this ignites LSU and they play with a chip on their shoulders

Messier-11 · Answer

you&#x27;ve got to be kidding me

Bling · Answer

It was a TD, you can tell from the behind angle his knee was not down when the side angle shows the ball crossing the goal line. The TV camera was right on the goal line, so there is no tricky angle. You're right, why have instant replay if they can't make the tough decisions/.

_Guru_ · Answer

The knee was obviously not down. You can tell from the other video his knees don&#x27;t touch until after he reaches and pulls back. That was GARBAGE.

Gusfgz · Answer

a lot of money on LSU on this game, that tell you something?

kevinm04 · Answer

It wasn&#x27;t a td!

Alldaygambler28 · Answer

It is shown from the shot on left where the ball is clear as day across. You can see his knee also. A guy just has to open his eyes and look a bit. I guess the refs didn't want to do that.

The Irish want it more and they are hitting to the whistle and beyond with no late hit calls. The refs are allowing it. This shiot happens every year in bowl season with 1 team wanting it more with less talent and the refs cooperating. Always seems to be 1 SEC team with the "who gives a rats behind" attitude and here it is.

Quote Originally Posted by jbkizzle:

it was a touchdown. but clearly not enough evidence to overturn, and this is coming from a guy with money on LSU to cover.

unfortunately, they don't look at multiple angles simultaneously to determine where the knee versus ball is. they only look at one camera shot. and no single camera shot was conclusive.

common sense clearly indicates it was a touchdown. but not enough evidence to overturn. sad face.

HeadOverHeart · Answer

These moronic announcers, and mow Lou Holtz at Halftime, saying "we can't see where his knee is." "We don't know where his knees are."

Unreal.

His knees WERE CLEARLY VISIBLE. AS CLEAR AS DAY. And they were even highlighted in-between the legs of two other players. It was so clear, YOU COULD SEE THE ROUND KNEE PAD on the LSU runner.

What were they looking at?

Ammoo · Answer

They checked with Vegas and they said no TD. They want more $$$ on LSU 2nd half

Wizerguy · Answer

My problem is if the douchbag player didnt run into his own guy he may have had more time to get in with no questions

Alldaygambler28 · Answer

Yes, but a guy has to open his eyes to actually see "the right call".

gfdog · Answer

You know ... everyone knows it was a touchdown. The sport has zero credibility. For that senile p.o.s. Holtz and the announcers to try to make excuses is pathetic.

jbkizzle · Answer

&#xD;&#xA;You&#x27;re really going to be angry at the placeholder? Dude did a pretty good job considering this isn&#x27;t his job; dove and extended the ball. Not his fault refs can&#x27;t get the call right.

Why do we use instant replay???

Hot Forum Topics