The idea that European teams can't win a World Cup in South America is blown out of proportion. The last time a world cup was held in South America was 1978, almost 35 years ago. Plus, the runner-up that year was Netherlands who played to a 1-1 draw in regular time.
Plus, the top South Americans play in Europe now which probably wasn't the case 35+ years ago. This means the weather/humidity won't matter as much as did back then because most of the players for Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay (or the top players) have been playing in Europe for the last year and aren't used to the humidity just like European players.
And in North America world cup venues, European teams did well. In 94, 3 of the 4 World Cup teams were European. The finals went to penalty kicks before Brazil ultimately won.
The idea that European teams can't win a World Cup in South America is blown out of proportion. The last time a world cup was held in South America was 1978, almost 35 years ago. Plus, the runner-up that year was Netherlands who played to a 1-1 draw in regular time.
Plus, the top South Americans play in Europe now which probably wasn't the case 35+ years ago. This means the weather/humidity won't matter as much as did back then because most of the players for Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay (or the top players) have been playing in Europe for the last year and aren't used to the humidity just like European players.
And in North America world cup venues, European teams did well. In 94, 3 of the 4 World Cup teams were European. The finals went to penalty kicks before Brazil ultimately won.
Yep 
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
