Thankyou williamshills. I just relocated to the U.S.A from Australia. Sports betting is legal there and there seems to be a lot of grey areas here.
Thankyou williamshills. I just relocated to the U.S.A from Australia. Sports betting is legal there and there seems to be a lot of grey areas here.
It's perfectly legal. The US government has no authority whatsoever regarding offshore gaming companies that are chartered and licensed in other jurisdictions. Those companies can take wagers from anyone they want to and US residents can make any wagers with any company they want to. The internet is fair game.
Some chicken garbage companies like Pinnacle and bet365 left the US market on their own. They could start taking bets again today from US residents and there's not a thing the US government could do about it.
It's perfectly legal. The US government has no authority whatsoever regarding offshore gaming companies that are chartered and licensed in other jurisdictions. Those companies can take wagers from anyone they want to and US residents can make any wagers with any company they want to. The internet is fair game.
Some chicken garbage companies like Pinnacle and bet365 left the US market on their own. They could start taking bets again today from US residents and there's not a thing the US government could do about it.
It's perfectly legal. The US government has no authority whatsoever regarding offshore gaming companies that are chartered and licensed in other jurisdictions. Those companies can take wagers from anyone they want to and US residents can make any wagers with any company they want to. The internet is fair game.
That is completely incorrect. The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act fo 2006.
Conducting Unlawful Internet Gambling
Unlawful Internet gambling is defined as:
It's perfectly legal. The US government has no authority whatsoever regarding offshore gaming companies that are chartered and licensed in other jurisdictions. Those companies can take wagers from anyone they want to and US residents can make any wagers with any company they want to. The internet is fair game.
That is completely incorrect. The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act fo 2006.
Conducting Unlawful Internet Gambling
Unlawful Internet gambling is defined as:
It's perfectly legal. The US government has no authority whatsoever regarding offshore gaming companies that are chartered and licensed in other jurisdictions. Those companies can take wagers from anyone they want to and US residents can make any wagers with any company they want to. The internet is fair game.
Some chicken garbage companies like Pinnacle and bet365 left the US market on their own. They could start taking bets again today from US residents and there's not a thing the US government could do about it.
Complete and utter garbage.
The US Govt has shown many times in the past that it believes it has jurisdiction over foreign companies who target US citizens.
It's perfectly legal. The US government has no authority whatsoever regarding offshore gaming companies that are chartered and licensed in other jurisdictions. Those companies can take wagers from anyone they want to and US residents can make any wagers with any company they want to. The internet is fair game.
Some chicken garbage companies like Pinnacle and bet365 left the US market on their own. They could start taking bets again today from US residents and there's not a thing the US government could do about it.
Complete and utter garbage.
The US Govt has shown many times in the past that it believes it has jurisdiction over foreign companies who target US citizens.
That is completely incorrect. The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act fo 2006.
Conducting Unlawful Internet Gambling
Unlawful Internet gambling is defined as:
Once again, complete garbage because it is taken out of context.
The UIGEA targets banks and money processors - not gamblers.
To answer the original question - it is totally legal to MAKE a bet (some states have laws against it, to my knowledge nobody has ever been prosecuted for making a bet). It is illegal to TAKE a bet.
That is completely incorrect. The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act fo 2006.
Conducting Unlawful Internet Gambling
Unlawful Internet gambling is defined as:
Once again, complete garbage because it is taken out of context.
The UIGEA targets banks and money processors - not gamblers.
To answer the original question - it is totally legal to MAKE a bet (some states have laws against it, to my knowledge nobody has ever been prosecuted for making a bet). It is illegal to TAKE a bet.
Once again, complete garbage because it is taken out of context.
The UIGEA targets banks and money processors - not gamblers.
To answer the original question - it is totally legal to MAKE a bet (some states have laws against it, to my knowledge nobody has ever been prosecuted for making a bet). It is illegal to TAKE a bet.
I have read through the US Gov several times, and can assure you that it is ILLEGAL to make a bet in the USA via online methods (unless of course you can do this via a Vegas book, etc). ILLEGAL ILLEGAL ILLEGAL. However....I agree..I don't know of anyone who has been prosecuted for making a bet, and the Gov would come after the establishments before they come after the users.
Keep your garbabe comments to yourself until you fully undertstand the law.
Once again, complete garbage because it is taken out of context.
The UIGEA targets banks and money processors - not gamblers.
To answer the original question - it is totally legal to MAKE a bet (some states have laws against it, to my knowledge nobody has ever been prosecuted for making a bet). It is illegal to TAKE a bet.
I have read through the US Gov several times, and can assure you that it is ILLEGAL to make a bet in the USA via online methods (unless of course you can do this via a Vegas book, etc). ILLEGAL ILLEGAL ILLEGAL. However....I agree..I don't know of anyone who has been prosecuted for making a bet, and the Gov would come after the establishments before they come after the users.
Keep your garbabe comments to yourself until you fully undertstand the law.
I have read through the US Gov several times, and can assure you that it is ILLEGAL to make a bet in the USA via online methods (unless of course you can do this via a Vegas book, etc). ILLEGAL ILLEGAL ILLEGAL. However....I agree..I don't know of anyone who has been prosecuted for making a bet, and the Gov would come after the establishments before they come after the users.
Keep your garbabe comments to yourself until you fully undertstand the law.
Don't listen to this clown. He doesn't know what he's talking about.
It is NOT "illegal, illegal, illegal, to place a bet online from the U.S.
As Vanzack stated, it is illegal to TAKE a bet.
According to federal law (or rather, the lack of a law against it), online gambling is in fact perfectly legal. U.S. Attorney Catherine Hanaway admitted in a 2007 House hearing that just placing wagers online doesn't violate federal law.
I have read through the US Gov several times, and can assure you that it is ILLEGAL to make a bet in the USA via online methods (unless of course you can do this via a Vegas book, etc). ILLEGAL ILLEGAL ILLEGAL. However....I agree..I don't know of anyone who has been prosecuted for making a bet, and the Gov would come after the establishments before they come after the users.
Keep your garbabe comments to yourself until you fully undertstand the law.
Don't listen to this clown. He doesn't know what he's talking about.
It is NOT "illegal, illegal, illegal, to place a bet online from the U.S.
As Vanzack stated, it is illegal to TAKE a bet.
According to federal law (or rather, the lack of a law against it), online gambling is in fact perfectly legal. U.S. Attorney Catherine Hanaway admitted in a 2007 House hearing that just placing wagers online doesn't violate federal law.
I have read through the US Gov several times, and can assure you that it is ILLEGAL to make a bet in the USA via online methods (unless of course you can do this via a Vegas book, etc). ILLEGAL ILLEGAL ILLEGAL. However....I agree..I don't know of anyone who has been prosecuted for making a bet, and the Gov would come after the establishments before they come after the users.
Keep your garbabe comments to yourself until you fully undertstand the law.
Here you go. I wrote this a few years ago, but for dummies like you - it is worth a refresher (it is in my blog section here at covers)....
Placing a wager on sports is totally legal at the federal level in the
Let me quote the ruling that has stood since
Congress intended the "business of gambling" to mean bookmaking, i.e. the taking and laying off of bets, and not mere betting. The provocative question is whether this is still the proper definition when the bettor wagers substantial sums and displays the sophistication of an expert in his knowledge of odds making. This court concludes that the statute simple does not covers such a situation. This court finds that Congress never intended to include a social bettor within the prohibition of the statute and that Congress did not contemplate prohibiting the activities of mere bettors, even where, as with Mr Baborian, they bet large sums of money with a great deal of sophistication.
The truth of the matter is that the DOJ does interpret the law the way I stated it, and that is evidenced by the fact that there has not been a single prosecution at the Federal level since the case I cited (USA vs Baborian 1981). Not one single bettor has been brought up on federal charges since 1981 unless there was tax evasion, money laundering, or RICO thrown at them. The Wire Act simply applies ONLY to those in the business of gambling, and as defined by the judicial system that means someone who TAKES bets. The following are some articles on the subject - keep in mind when reading them that when they say sportsbetting is illegal under the wire act - the key definition is that of someone "in the business of gambling" which has been defined to exclude the person placing bets.
https://www.playwinningpoker.com/online/poker/legal/
https://www.gambling-law-us.com/Federal-Laws/wire-act.htm
https://www.unc.edu/courses/2006spring/law/357c/001/projects/dsmatthe/federal.html (important pertinent text quoted in italics below - its about the 4th paragraph in the link)
Criticisms of the Wire Act’s Applicability to Online Gambling
Even if the Wire Act is shown to apply to internet gambling it would only apply to gambling operators, since it expressly states that it applies only to those “engaged in the business of betting or wagering.” 18 U.S.C. 1084,
I have read through the US Gov several times, and can assure you that it is ILLEGAL to make a bet in the USA via online methods (unless of course you can do this via a Vegas book, etc). ILLEGAL ILLEGAL ILLEGAL. However....I agree..I don't know of anyone who has been prosecuted for making a bet, and the Gov would come after the establishments before they come after the users.
Keep your garbabe comments to yourself until you fully undertstand the law.
Here you go. I wrote this a few years ago, but for dummies like you - it is worth a refresher (it is in my blog section here at covers)....
Placing a wager on sports is totally legal at the federal level in the
Let me quote the ruling that has stood since
Congress intended the "business of gambling" to mean bookmaking, i.e. the taking and laying off of bets, and not mere betting. The provocative question is whether this is still the proper definition when the bettor wagers substantial sums and displays the sophistication of an expert in his knowledge of odds making. This court concludes that the statute simple does not covers such a situation. This court finds that Congress never intended to include a social bettor within the prohibition of the statute and that Congress did not contemplate prohibiting the activities of mere bettors, even where, as with Mr Baborian, they bet large sums of money with a great deal of sophistication.
The truth of the matter is that the DOJ does interpret the law the way I stated it, and that is evidenced by the fact that there has not been a single prosecution at the Federal level since the case I cited (USA vs Baborian 1981). Not one single bettor has been brought up on federal charges since 1981 unless there was tax evasion, money laundering, or RICO thrown at them. The Wire Act simply applies ONLY to those in the business of gambling, and as defined by the judicial system that means someone who TAKES bets. The following are some articles on the subject - keep in mind when reading them that when they say sportsbetting is illegal under the wire act - the key definition is that of someone "in the business of gambling" which has been defined to exclude the person placing bets.
https://www.playwinningpoker.com/online/poker/legal/
https://www.gambling-law-us.com/Federal-Laws/wire-act.htm
https://www.unc.edu/courses/2006spring/law/357c/001/projects/dsmatthe/federal.html (important pertinent text quoted in italics below - its about the 4th paragraph in the link)
Criticisms of the Wire Act’s Applicability to Online Gambling
Even if the Wire Act is shown to apply to internet gambling it would only apply to gambling operators, since it expressly states that it applies only to those “engaged in the business of betting or wagering.” 18 U.S.C. 1084,
You might have heard of the UIGEA that was passed under GWB in 2006. This has nothing to do with the gambler, and everything to do with the credit card processors and banks. This does not criminalize anything for the player. In a nutshell, it makes it harder to get money back and forth, but if you can get money back and forth, you have done nothing illegal as the gambler.
If sports gambling was already illegal under the wire act why would they be trying to pass the proposition to update the wire act? They wouldnt need to. Politicians love to say that sports betting is illegal but then at the same time are trying to pass a bill that makes it illegal. Does that make sense to you? That should be proof alone.
Simple google searches on the subject will all be consistent - if it is a politician talking they will say the wire act makes it illegal and if it is an attorney or independent party they will state the facts - that no federal statute covers online gambling (poker or sportsbetting) if you are placing wagers and not in the business of gambling as defined in 1981.
Now this is all at the FEDE
You might have heard of the UIGEA that was passed under GWB in 2006. This has nothing to do with the gambler, and everything to do with the credit card processors and banks. This does not criminalize anything for the player. In a nutshell, it makes it harder to get money back and forth, but if you can get money back and forth, you have done nothing illegal as the gambler.
If sports gambling was already illegal under the wire act why would they be trying to pass the proposition to update the wire act? They wouldnt need to. Politicians love to say that sports betting is illegal but then at the same time are trying to pass a bill that makes it illegal. Does that make sense to you? That should be proof alone.
Simple google searches on the subject will all be consistent - if it is a politician talking they will say the wire act makes it illegal and if it is an attorney or independent party they will state the facts - that no federal statute covers online gambling (poker or sportsbetting) if you are placing wagers and not in the business of gambling as defined in 1981.
Now this is all at the FEDE
I have read through the US Gov several times, and can assure you that it is ILLEGAL to make a bet in the USA via online methods (unless of course you can do this via a Vegas book, etc). ILLEGAL ILLEGAL ILLEGAL. However....I agree..I don't know of anyone who has been prosecuted for making a bet, and the Gov would come after the establishments before they come after the users.
Keep your garbabe comments to yourself until you fully undertstand the law.
Now, care to tell me how I dont understand the law?
I have read through the US Gov several times, and can assure you that it is ILLEGAL to make a bet in the USA via online methods (unless of course you can do this via a Vegas book, etc). ILLEGAL ILLEGAL ILLEGAL. However....I agree..I don't know of anyone who has been prosecuted for making a bet, and the Gov would come after the establishments before they come after the users.
Keep your garbabe comments to yourself until you fully undertstand the law.
Now, care to tell me how I dont understand the law?
It's perfectly legal. The US government has no authority whatsoever regarding offshore gaming companies that are chartered and licensed in other jurisdictions. Those companies can take wagers from anyone they want to and US residents can make any wagers with any company they want to. The internet is fair game.
Some chicken garbage companies like Pinnacle and bet365 left the US market on their own. They could start taking bets again today from US residents and there's not a thing the US government could do about it.
It's perfectly legal. The US government has no authority whatsoever regarding offshore gaming companies that are chartered and licensed in other jurisdictions. Those companies can take wagers from anyone they want to and US residents can make any wagers with any company they want to. The internet is fair game.
Some chicken garbage companies like Pinnacle and bet365 left the US market on their own. They could start taking bets again today from US residents and there's not a thing the US government could do about it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.