Yeah, I know it's not a normal house show since it will be featured on the WWE Network, but it is still pretty damn impressive that 5DImes has allowed betting on a non-PPV for the first time ever.
Cena -1350
Rollins +650
Ziggler +170
Rusev -230
Owens -2000
Jericho +1000
Big Show +4500
Lesnar -17500
Orton -270
Sheamus +190
If Sparky or anyone else has a compelling side on any of these, share...
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Yeah, I know it's not a normal house show since it will be featured on the WWE Network, but it is still pretty damn impressive that 5DImes has allowed betting on a non-PPV for the first time ever.
Cena -1350
Rollins +650
Ziggler +170
Rusev -230
Owens -2000
Jericho +1000
Big Show +4500
Lesnar -17500
Orton -270
Sheamus +190
If Sparky or anyone else has a compelling side on any of these, share...
I stayed away because I wasn't sure if they'd treat this like a PPV or not. I would have said there was value in the Dudley Boyz at -120 because I could see them winning the titles to get more people the "wow" factor and to show fans that they have to have the network because "anything can happen." And, worst case scenario, they win by DQ again, which is what happened.
WWE is going to be doing more of these types of events because the one in Tokyo was such a success and I heard they may do a "Bash at the Beach" type of thing in the future as well. I feel like a title will have to switch hands eventually.
I only saw the Lesnar v Big Show match and while it was really short...I enjoyed every part of it and then Lesnar coming back out. We all know he's a beast of a man and I know he botched the first F5 lift but to stand there with Big Show on his shoulders is always insane to see. Let alone flinging him across the air and dropping him down.
0
I stayed away because I wasn't sure if they'd treat this like a PPV or not. I would have said there was value in the Dudley Boyz at -120 because I could see them winning the titles to get more people the "wow" factor and to show fans that they have to have the network because "anything can happen." And, worst case scenario, they win by DQ again, which is what happened.
WWE is going to be doing more of these types of events because the one in Tokyo was such a success and I heard they may do a "Bash at the Beach" type of thing in the future as well. I feel like a title will have to switch hands eventually.
I only saw the Lesnar v Big Show match and while it was really short...I enjoyed every part of it and then Lesnar coming back out. We all know he's a beast of a man and I know he botched the first F5 lift but to stand there with Big Show on his shoulders is always insane to see. Let alone flinging him across the air and dropping him down.
When I was about 13 I watched a lot of pro wrestling but lost interest after awhile.
It's more popular now than it was then, and recently I watched a few minutes of a couple shows to see what the deal was. It's obvious to me they have grown their loyal fan base by targeting the guy demographic.
The sexy women by the ring and in the ring is nothing new to appeal to us heterosexuals, but it's pretty obvious with the attire and the frequent up the arse camera angles they are aggressively targeting the guy audience and want to keep homosexuals glued to the screen. Well played McMahon, well played
0
When I was about 13 I watched a lot of pro wrestling but lost interest after awhile.
It's more popular now than it was then, and recently I watched a few minutes of a couple shows to see what the deal was. It's obvious to me they have grown their loyal fan base by targeting the guy demographic.
The sexy women by the ring and in the ring is nothing new to appeal to us heterosexuals, but it's pretty obvious with the attire and the frequent up the arse camera angles they are aggressively targeting the guy audience and want to keep homosexuals glued to the screen. Well played McMahon, well played
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Really, 
Hot Forum Topics
