I saw her on a tv show yesterday talking about how important education is. Everytime i see her on tv talking about how important education is i think about how her husband has the lowest iq of any president in the history of the United States. An iq of 104. I took an iq test mine was 126. Like i said before the education system and sports is rigged. You have people that have had iqs of 150s Brokaw 128 John Kerry 127 and they all got rejected to Harvard. Yet obama with an iq of 104 was accepted and president of the Harvard law review. Harvard accepts 5% of all of applicants yet you have someone who is barely in the top 50% of the county in intelligence (average person has iq of 99 in the United States) and he not only gets accepted to Harvard he becomes the president of the United States.
While we are talking about this its kind of funny because Alan Dershowitz who is the Harvard law professor just came out yesterday and said Obama will go down in history as having one of the worst foreign policies ever of any president. He is a yale alma mater jurist and lawyer and author. I'd ask Mr. Dershowitz how in a free and equal opportunity society how does someone like that get accepted to Harvard when John Kerry iq 127 gets rejected twice, Tom Brokaw iq of 128 gets rejected and people with iqs of 150 get rejected? How is it possible they go on to become president? Why would they be president of the Harvard law review when they make such terrible decisions? It doesn't say much about the university you are a professor at. Your answer will be the same as mine the system is corrupt.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I saw her on a tv show yesterday talking about how important education is. Everytime i see her on tv talking about how important education is i think about how her husband has the lowest iq of any president in the history of the United States. An iq of 104. I took an iq test mine was 126. Like i said before the education system and sports is rigged. You have people that have had iqs of 150s Brokaw 128 John Kerry 127 and they all got rejected to Harvard. Yet obama with an iq of 104 was accepted and president of the Harvard law review. Harvard accepts 5% of all of applicants yet you have someone who is barely in the top 50% of the county in intelligence (average person has iq of 99 in the United States) and he not only gets accepted to Harvard he becomes the president of the United States.
While we are talking about this its kind of funny because Alan Dershowitz who is the Harvard law professor just came out yesterday and said Obama will go down in history as having one of the worst foreign policies ever of any president. He is a yale alma mater jurist and lawyer and author. I'd ask Mr. Dershowitz how in a free and equal opportunity society how does someone like that get accepted to Harvard when John Kerry iq 127 gets rejected twice, Tom Brokaw iq of 128 gets rejected and people with iqs of 150 get rejected? How is it possible they go on to become president? Why would they be president of the Harvard law review when they make such terrible decisions? It doesn't say much about the university you are a professor at. Your answer will be the same as mine the system is corrupt.
If the Manchurian Candidate's records/application to Harvard are revealed the reason for his acceptence will be black/white. He applied as a Black,Muslim,low-income,Foreign National.He was affirmative-action on every score and the records can't be photo-shopped like his Hawaiian birth certificate.
Throughout his 8 years Harvard has maintained that his records are sealed.
Bill Clinton knew in 2008 and floated this but he had no pull to do anything about it in the Primarys.
0
If the Manchurian Candidate's records/application to Harvard are revealed the reason for his acceptence will be black/white. He applied as a Black,Muslim,low-income,Foreign National.He was affirmative-action on every score and the records can't be photo-shopped like his Hawaiian birth certificate.
Throughout his 8 years Harvard has maintained that his records are sealed.
Bill Clinton knew in 2008 and floated this but he had no pull to do anything about it in the Primarys.
i don't know. see, post number 1 leads to posts like #6. so i might have to stand by my statement.
do people not realize that school records are confidential. even if a school wanted to let anyone see a student's records, which they don't, federal law prohibits this? or do people just watch fox news and remain painfully ignorant about such things?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:
If it's not the dumbest, it's definitely the most ironic.
i don't know. see, post number 1 leads to posts like #6. so i might have to stand by my statement.
do people not realize that school records are confidential. even if a school wanted to let anyone see a student's records, which they don't, federal law prohibits this? or do people just watch fox news and remain painfully ignorant about such things?
Do you realize that no federal law prohibits the review of school records UNLESS the subject requests that they be closed,such as this case of O. George W Bush's records were closed at Yale but the records were hacked and published in the NY Times.
What is painfully obvious is that from which some people are painfully ignorant.
0
Do you realize that no federal law prohibits the review of school records UNLESS the subject requests that they be closed,such as this case of O. George W Bush's records were closed at Yale but the records were hacked and published in the NY Times.
What is painfully obvious is that from which some people are painfully ignorant.
Do you realize that no federal law prohibits the review of school records UNLESS the subject requests that they be closed,such as this case of O. George W Bush's records were closed at Yale but the records were hacked and published in the NY Times.
What is painfully obvious is that from which some people are painfully ignorant.
jesus, dude, you really need to forget fox news exists. you really think federal law allows anyone to access anyone else's school records and the school must release them unless the student says no. how do you think this works, every time someone wants to get obama's harvard records, harvard calls up obama and says, this guy wants your records, we're going to release them unless you have a problem with it?
maybe i'll look and see how 666les did in his last year in school. i'll call up Highland Middle School and request your 5th grade records. they'll say, sure, here they are. no wait, let us call 666les first and see if he's ok with it.
schools don't give out people's records to other people. beyond that, there is a federal law that keeps people's school records confidential. it applies to any school that gets federal funding which includes almost all colleges and graduate schools. of course any student or graduate can consent to a request for his records, but absent that, the records are confidential except in very few specific situations. if you actually want to read about the law, you can do it here.
Do you realize that no federal law prohibits the review of school records UNLESS the subject requests that they be closed,such as this case of O. George W Bush's records were closed at Yale but the records were hacked and published in the NY Times.
What is painfully obvious is that from which some people are painfully ignorant.
jesus, dude, you really need to forget fox news exists. you really think federal law allows anyone to access anyone else's school records and the school must release them unless the student says no. how do you think this works, every time someone wants to get obama's harvard records, harvard calls up obama and says, this guy wants your records, we're going to release them unless you have a problem with it?
maybe i'll look and see how 666les did in his last year in school. i'll call up Highland Middle School and request your 5th grade records. they'll say, sure, here they are. no wait, let us call 666les first and see if he's ok with it.
schools don't give out people's records to other people. beyond that, there is a federal law that keeps people's school records confidential. it applies to any school that gets federal funding which includes almost all colleges and graduate schools. of course any student or graduate can consent to a request for his records, but absent that, the records are confidential except in very few specific situations. if you actually want to read about the law, you can do it here.
i don't know. see, post number 1 leads to posts like #6. so i might have to stand by my statement.
do people not realize that school records are confidential. even if a school wanted to let anyone see a student's records, which they don't, federal law prohibits this? or do people just watch fox news and remain painfully ignorant about such things?
I was just referring to the OP criticizing someone's intelligence in this thread, and then the title in the thread that I linked.
Just seemed ironic to me.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
i don't know. see, post number 1 leads to posts like #6. so i might have to stand by my statement.
do people not realize that school records are confidential. even if a school wanted to let anyone see a student's records, which they don't, federal law prohibits this? or do people just watch fox news and remain painfully ignorant about such things?
I was just referring to the OP criticizing someone's intelligence in this thread, and then the title in the thread that I linked.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.