Delrawn Small shooting....

 I mean, someone who starts a thread on a topic surely should have the integrity to follow through on it not even a day later, particularly when relevant evidence emerges...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3681712/Video-shows-duty-cop-shot-black-man-seconds-road-rage-row-breaking-contradicting-witness-said-father-beat-s-officer.html

So Mugg, how long was it going to take for you to update the new video on this post? I'm sure you've seen the new footage by now.

Or haven't you? I mean, someone who starts a thread on a topic surely should have the integrity to follow through on it not even a day later, particularly when relevant evidence emerges...

Because we all can infer the intent of the OP right?

The post was made at the same time the posts concerning the Sterling and Castile shooting.

And it wants to point a finger at someone who is black who 'earned two in the chest and one in the head' as SearchWarrant so classily points out (now there's a man of integrity if you need an example). His wording there really hits home on his mindset regarding all this. Shoot first, ask questions later, especially if the person you are shooting...do I need to finish?

Then you can all nod at each other on your barstools and gleefully wallow in the death of another emotionally (who, lo and behold, just happens to be black).

Or should we all whip out or weapons and discharge them instantly on any and all who approaches you? I'm sure that will be your answer. I'm sure, even with the video, as with the videos of Sterling and Castile, you will find some wiggle room to justify your OP even in the face of evidence that is completely contradictory to the original claims. Or maybe others will do it for you.

So maybe, you don't even need to post again. We all know your answer. Your answer, like the ilk that resides here, has always and will always suit your prejudices.

Anyhow, back to web surfing to find OP's to suit your needs at the perfect time.