I don't know if she did anything wrong or not because I havn't followed it that close. Her talking to the fbi was a good decision. It made her look transparent and wanting to get down to the answers.
If anything I would of suggest she talked a little longer more like five hours. It was a very good move on her part.
I voted for Bill, but voted for Ron Paul the last two elections. The one thing that worries me about voting for democrat is the domestic terrorism. And really terrorism world wide. We see more attacks all the time it seems. I think the economy is good under a democratic president. I don't like the sense that it is not safe for you to travel almost anywhere.
She takes being safe to the extreme I think. If Donald Trump said to her Hillary i don't think it is safe for you to run for president i doubt she would just step out of the race.
Whats interesting about the race is they both have very high disability rankings in the numbers. 7 out of 10 americans dislike Trump and 6 out of 10 Americans dislike Hillary.
Can't speak for Bill but she is a more honest person than people think.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I don't know if she did anything wrong or not because I havn't followed it that close. Her talking to the fbi was a good decision. It made her look transparent and wanting to get down to the answers.
If anything I would of suggest she talked a little longer more like five hours. It was a very good move on her part.
I voted for Bill, but voted for Ron Paul the last two elections. The one thing that worries me about voting for democrat is the domestic terrorism. And really terrorism world wide. We see more attacks all the time it seems. I think the economy is good under a democratic president. I don't like the sense that it is not safe for you to travel almost anywhere.
She takes being safe to the extreme I think. If Donald Trump said to her Hillary i don't think it is safe for you to run for president i doubt she would just step out of the race.
Whats interesting about the race is they both have very high disability rankings in the numbers. 7 out of 10 americans dislike Trump and 6 out of 10 Americans dislike Hillary.
Can't speak for Bill but she is a more honest person than people think.
She had no choice, if she didn't they would have sent out a subpoena. She then says she wanted to talk like everyone just loves talking to the FBI about something that could get her in jail. She is the most disingenuous person ever.
0
She had no choice, if she didn't they would have sent out a subpoena. She then says she wanted to talk like everyone just loves talking to the FBI about something that could get her in jail. She is the most disingenuous person ever.
Obama appointed the Attorney General and recommended the FBI interview. How would anything possibly go wrong for Billary? Whole charade is just smoke and mirrors.
0
Obama appointed the Attorney General and recommended the FBI interview. How would anything possibly go wrong for Billary? Whole charade is just smoke and mirrors.
Was it also a smart move for HRC to have her husband meet with the AG days before her chat with the FBI?
Hillary's so corrupt it is laughable.
Unfortunately, unless something drastic happens in the next few months, then the good ol' U S of A will be run by a moronic, complete narcissist, or a lying, scandalous b!tch.
Either way, we the people lose
bigreds daddy
0
Was it also a smart move for HRC to have her husband meet with the AG days before her chat with the FBI?
Hillary's so corrupt it is laughable.
Unfortunately, unless something drastic happens in the next few months, then the good ol' U S of A will be run by a moronic, complete narcissist, or a lying, scandalous b!tch.
Since legal experts said that this case has a low probability of indictment, an earlier interview would be advantageous for Clinton. Her public popularity would be higher without any perceived scandal during a election campaign. Despite years of political attacks against her, Clinton is still a favourite in polls and gambling markets.
0
Since legal experts said that this case has a low probability of indictment, an earlier interview would be advantageous for Clinton. Her public popularity would be higher without any perceived scandal during a election campaign. Despite years of political attacks against her, Clinton is still a favourite in polls and gambling markets.
She had no choice, if she didn't they would have sent out a subpoena. She then says she wanted to talk like everyone just loves talking to the FBI about something that could get her in jail. She is the most disingenuous person ever.
Thank you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by 165yds:
She had no choice, if she didn't they would have sent out a subpoena. She then says she wanted to talk like everyone just loves talking to the FBI about something that could get her in jail. She is the most disingenuous person ever.
Obama appointed the Attorney General and recommended the FBI interview. How would anything possibly go wrong for Billary? Whole charade is just smoke and mirrors.
This
0
Quote Originally Posted by searchwarrant:
Obama appointed the Attorney General and recommended the FBI interview. How would anything possibly go wrong for Billary? Whole charade is just smoke and mirrors.
Since legal experts said that this case has a low probability of indictment, an earlier interview would be advantageous for Clinton. Her public popularity would be higher without any perceived scandal during a election campaign. Despite years of political attacks against her, Clinton is still a favourite in polls and gambling markets.
100% correct. This entire case was going nowhere from the get go as most lawyers were saying all along. Did she screw up??? Absolutely. Did she knowingly intend to violate the law-the FBI ruled that she didn't. This entire case was going nowhere from the start.
0
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Since legal experts said that this case has a low probability of indictment, an earlier interview would be advantageous for Clinton. Her public popularity would be higher without any perceived scandal during a election campaign. Despite years of political attacks against her, Clinton is still a favourite in polls and gambling markets.
100% correct. This entire case was going nowhere from the get go as most lawyers were saying all along. Did she screw up??? Absolutely. Did she knowingly intend to violate the law-the FBI ruled that she didn't. This entire case was going nowhere from the start.
She had no choice, if she didn't they would have sent out a subpoena. She then says she wanted to talk like everyone just loves talking to the FBI about something that could get her in jail. She is the most disingenuous person ever.
Fact
0
Quote Originally Posted by 165yds:
She had no choice, if she didn't they would have sent out a subpoena. She then says she wanted to talk like everyone just loves talking to the FBI about something that could get her in jail. She is the most disingenuous person ever.
100% correct. This entire case was going nowhere from the get go as most lawyers were saying all along. Did she screw up??? Absolutely. Did she knowingly intend to violate the law-the FBI ruled that she didn't. This entire case was going nowhere from the start.
Don't buy the media baloney. The statute in question, 18 U.S.793 (f) does not require intent. It requires only gross negligence, which is the equivalent of extreme carelessness, which is precisely what the FBI concluded happened.
0
Quote Originally Posted by gold6185:
100% correct. This entire case was going nowhere from the get go as most lawyers were saying all along. Did she screw up??? Absolutely. Did she knowingly intend to violate the law-the FBI ruled that she didn't. This entire case was going nowhere from the start.
Don't buy the media baloney. The statute in question, 18 U.S.793 (f) does not require intent. It requires only gross negligence, which is the equivalent of extreme carelessness, which is precisely what the FBI concluded happened.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.